Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The (European) Derisking State
View through CrossRef
The emerging green capitalist state in the Global North is a derisking state. The derisking state enlists private capital into achieving public policy priorities by tinkering with risk/returns on private investments in sovereign bonds, currency, social infrastructure (schools, roads, hospitals and houses, care homes and prisons, water plants and natural parks) and most recently, green industries. The concern with the production of investibility forges a state-capital relationship where capital dominates. Yet the specific architecture of regulatory, fiscal and monetary derisking interventions varies across polities, is activated at different speeds and with different degrees of coordination, contingent on specific macrofinancial constraints and vulnerable to political strains. Both in the EU and the US, derisking has emerged as the method to organise green industrial upgrading in the Green Deal Industrial Plan and the US Inflation Reduction Act, successfully generating elite support for taboo-breaking autonomous strategic visions, in contrast with the state-directed approach in the CHIPS Act that disciplines private capital into national security priorities for semiconductor manufacturing. In the EU, 'whatever it takes' derisking does not easily translate from monetary to fiscal and industrial policy, because it requires Member States to agree on relaxing the distinctly European macrofinancial constraints around the provision of state-aid. The institutional response to these constraints, the European Sovereignty Fund, reinforces the derisking imperative. Furthermore, the limited scope for disciplining (carbon) capital raises serious doubts about the overall suitability of derisking for governing decarbonisation.
Title: The (European) Derisking State
Description:
The emerging green capitalist state in the Global North is a derisking state.
The derisking state enlists private capital into achieving public policy priorities by tinkering with risk/returns on private investments in sovereign bonds, currency, social infrastructure (schools, roads, hospitals and houses, care homes and prisons, water plants and natural parks) and most recently, green industries.
The concern with the production of investibility forges a state-capital relationship where capital dominates.
Yet the specific architecture of regulatory, fiscal and monetary derisking interventions varies across polities, is activated at different speeds and with different degrees of coordination, contingent on specific macrofinancial constraints and vulnerable to political strains.
Both in the EU and the US, derisking has emerged as the method to organise green industrial upgrading in the Green Deal Industrial Plan and the US Inflation Reduction Act, successfully generating elite support for taboo-breaking autonomous strategic visions, in contrast with the state-directed approach in the CHIPS Act that disciplines private capital into national security priorities for semiconductor manufacturing.
In the EU, 'whatever it takes' derisking does not easily translate from monetary to fiscal and industrial policy, because it requires Member States to agree on relaxing the distinctly European macrofinancial constraints around the provision of state-aid.
The institutional response to these constraints, the European Sovereignty Fund, reinforces the derisking imperative.
Furthermore, the limited scope for disciplining (carbon) capital raises serious doubts about the overall suitability of derisking for governing decarbonisation.
Related Results
Green macrofinancial regimes
Green macrofinancial regimes
Debates about climate policy have neglected the question of macrofinancial pathways to decarbonisation, not all of which are economically and politically viable. We propose a theor...
Green macrofinancial regimes
Green macrofinancial regimes
Debates about climate policy have neglected the question of macrofinancial pathways to decarbonisation, not all of which are economically and politically viable. We propose a theor...
Debt Derisking
Debt Derisking
We examine how corporate bond fund managers manipulate portfolio risk in response to incentives. We find that liquidity risk concerns drive the allocation decisions of underperform...
Instrumente financiare de reducere a riscurilor in economia circulară
Instrumente financiare de reducere a riscurilor in economia circulară
The circular economy aims to reduce overconsumption, restore and regenerate ecosystems and design-out waste. Waste management has historically been financed by the public sector an...
Derisking/debanking jako „metody” zapewniania bezpieczeństwa?
Derisking/debanking jako „metody” zapewniania bezpieczeństwa?
Założenia systemu AML/CFT preferowały oddolną inicjatywę instytucji obowiązanych w zakresie oceny ryzyka instytucji oraz indywidualnego klienta. Z czasem wobec takiego stanu rzeczy...
Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Effect in municipal law — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 2 of Convention — Human Rights Act 19...
Political Function of the State: Contemporary Challenges
Political Function of the State: Contemporary Challenges
The article is devoted to the study of the essence of the political function of the state, as the modern world is a dynamic environment in which political challenges are constantly...
State Formation
State Formation
The term state formation is most commonly used to describe the long-term processes that led to the genesis of modern political domination in the form of the territorial sovereign s...

