Javascript must be enabled to continue!
What Does It Take To Further Our Knowledge of Plant Diversity in The Megadiverse South Africa?
View through CrossRef
Although South Africa is well known for its incredible biodiversity, targeted efforts are still re-quired to accelerate the discovery and description of the still-unknown species in this floristically mega-diverse country. In addition, new species discovery is a new opportunity for the devel-opment of ethnobotanical knowledge. In the present study, we collected data on current knowledge of plant richness in the country and expert taxonomists’ opinions and used statistical modelling technique to predict what might still be missing in South Africa’s flora. According to experts’ opinions and our modelling, we might be missing 1400-1575 plant species in the country. We predicted that we might take 40-45 years to identify and describe these species and that be-tween 64 and 315 taxonomists will be required. The pool of taxonomists who took part in this study have spent a total of R 680 670 000 (US $40 039 411) to describe 419 species. This implies that, in theory, R 1 624 510.74 (US $95 559) was spent, on average, to describe 1 species. At this rate, R 2 558 604 415.00 (US $150 506 142) would be required to describe the 1575 (modelling) or R 2 274 315 036.00 (US $133 783 237) for the 1400 remaining species (expert opinion) in the current context where both full- and part-time taxonomists are committed to biodiversity assessment in the country. It is important to highlight that this estimate does not correspond to what is required specifically for only species description but does integrate all connected activities, e.g., running cost, bursary, salaries, grants, etc. Furthermore, we must bear in mind that these estimates do not account for the possibility of taxonomic revision which, on its own, needs to be funded, nor do they account for molecular laboratory requirement. However, if we consider that 15% of the predicted funds are spent solely on taxonomic activities, this means that we would need ~R243 673 (US$ 14 334) on 1 species. Overall, our study provides an important figure that can inform policy development including funding and recruitment strategies of taxonomists to fuel efforts towards a comprehensive assessment of the unique South Africa’s biodiversity. The implication of new species discovery is that it opens windows for traditional knowledge development.
Title: What Does It Take To Further Our Knowledge of Plant Diversity in The Megadiverse South Africa?
Description:
Although South Africa is well known for its incredible biodiversity, targeted efforts are still re-quired to accelerate the discovery and description of the still-unknown species in this floristically mega-diverse country.
In addition, new species discovery is a new opportunity for the devel-opment of ethnobotanical knowledge.
In the present study, we collected data on current knowledge of plant richness in the country and expert taxonomists’ opinions and used statistical modelling technique to predict what might still be missing in South Africa’s flora.
According to experts’ opinions and our modelling, we might be missing 1400-1575 plant species in the country.
We predicted that we might take 40-45 years to identify and describe these species and that be-tween 64 and 315 taxonomists will be required.
The pool of taxonomists who took part in this study have spent a total of R 680 670 000 (US $40 039 411) to describe 419 species.
This implies that, in theory, R 1 624 510.
74 (US $95 559) was spent, on average, to describe 1 species.
At this rate, R 2 558 604 415.
00 (US $150 506 142) would be required to describe the 1575 (modelling) or R 2 274 315 036.
00 (US $133 783 237) for the 1400 remaining species (expert opinion) in the current context where both full- and part-time taxonomists are committed to biodiversity assessment in the country.
It is important to highlight that this estimate does not correspond to what is required specifically for only species description but does integrate all connected activities, e.
g.
, running cost, bursary, salaries, grants, etc.
Furthermore, we must bear in mind that these estimates do not account for the possibility of taxonomic revision which, on its own, needs to be funded, nor do they account for molecular laboratory requirement.
However, if we consider that 15% of the predicted funds are spent solely on taxonomic activities, this means that we would need ~R243 673 (US$ 14 334) on 1 species.
Overall, our study provides an important figure that can inform policy development including funding and recruitment strategies of taxonomists to fuel efforts towards a comprehensive assessment of the unique South Africa’s biodiversity.
The implication of new species discovery is that it opens windows for traditional knowledge development.
Related Results
Afrikanske smede
Afrikanske smede
African Smiths Cultural-historical and sociological problems illuminated by studies among the Tuareg and by comparative analysisIn KUML 1957 in connection with a description of sla...
Border rossing, collecting, gravitating: small narratives of three ordinary collectors in the Chinese diaspora in South Africa since the late 1980s
Border rossing, collecting, gravitating: small narratives of three ordinary collectors in the Chinese diaspora in South Africa since the late 1980s
Shifting away from the conventional viewpoint that confines art collecting predominantly to established structures like art institutions, markets, and exclusive collector networks,...
Mindy Calling: Size, Beauty, Race in The Mindy Project
Mindy Calling: Size, Beauty, Race in The Mindy Project
When characters in the Fox Television sitcom The Mindy Project call Mindy Lahiri fat, Mindy sees it as a case of misidentification. She reminds the character that she is a “petite ...
New species of the Afrotropical spider genus Cheiramiona Lotz & Dippenaar-Schoeman (Araneae: Eutichuridae)
New species of the Afrotropical spider genus Cheiramiona Lotz & Dippenaar-Schoeman (Araneae: Eutichuridae)
Twenty-three new species of the Afrotropical sac spider genus Cheiramiona Lotz & Dippenaar-Schoeman, 1999 are described: C. baviaan sp. nov. (♀, South Africa), C. boschrandensi...
Diversity of Plant community in Satun Geopark
Diversity of Plant community in Satun Geopark
Background and Objectives: The diversity of species and plant communities varies among the areas. Understanding of species and their habitats is vital on conservation and sustainab...
Mix En Meng It Op: Emile YX?'s Alternative Race and Language Politics in South African Hip-Hop
Mix En Meng It Op: Emile YX?'s Alternative Race and Language Politics in South African Hip-Hop
This paper explores South African hip-hop activist Emile YX?'s work to suggest that he presents an alternative take on mainstream US and South African hip-hop. While it is arguable...
PRACTICE OF RACISM IN SOUTH AFRICA POST-APARTHEID
PRACTICE OF RACISM IN SOUTH AFRICA POST-APARTHEID
This paper aims to describe: First, the background of the rise of apartheid politics in South Africa. Second, the implementation of apartheid politics in South Africa in 2016-2019....
Global Perspective on Diversity and Inclusion
Global Perspective on Diversity and Inclusion
Diversity and inclusion are two terms that provide an umbrella for efforts to tackle discrimination, exclusion, and inequality by valuing diversity and promoting inclusion for hist...

