Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Types and anatomical locations of injuries among mountain bikers and hikers: A systematic review

View through CrossRef
Background Mountain biking and hiking continue to grow in popularity. With new participants to these sports, it is likely the number of injuries will increase. To assist medical personnel in the management of these patients we attempted to quantify the types and locations of injuries sustained by mountain bikers and hikers. Objective The objective of this systematic review is to identify the type and anatomical location of injuries for both mountain bikers and hikers. Methods A systematic search was undertaken using CINAHL, Cochrane, ProQuest, PubMed and Scopus databases. Reviewers assessed the eligibility of articles by a title/abstract review and final full-text review. Studies were included if the types of injuries were reported by medical personnel and contained anatomical locations. Studies were excluded if it did not take place on a trail or if the injuries were self-reported. Risk of bias was assessed utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists for study quality. No meta-analysis or comparison between mountain bikers and hikers was possible due to the high heterogeneity of the definition of injury. Results A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, 17 covering mountain biking and 7 hiking. This represented 220,935 injured mountain bikers and 17,757 injured hikers. The most common type of injuries sustained by mountain bikers included contusions, abrasions and minor lacerations, which made up between 45–74% of reported injuries in studies on competitive racing and 8–67% in non-competitive studies. Fractures represented between 1.5–43% of all reported injuries. The most injured region was the upper limbs reported in 10 of 17 studies. For hikers the most common injuries included blisters and ankle sprains with blisters representing 8–33% of all reported injuries. The most common body location to be injured by hikers was a lower limb in all 7 studies. Conclusions This is the first systematic review to report on the injury epidemiology of the two most common trail users; mountain bikers and hikers. For participants in both activities the majority of injuries were of minor severity. Despite this, the high proportions of upper limb fractures in mountain bikers and ankle sprains in hikers cannot be ignored. Trial registration Registration: This systematic review was prospectively registered with the University of York PROSPERO database on the 12/4/2021 (CRD42021229623) https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021229623.
Title: Types and anatomical locations of injuries among mountain bikers and hikers: A systematic review
Description:
Background Mountain biking and hiking continue to grow in popularity.
With new participants to these sports, it is likely the number of injuries will increase.
To assist medical personnel in the management of these patients we attempted to quantify the types and locations of injuries sustained by mountain bikers and hikers.
Objective The objective of this systematic review is to identify the type and anatomical location of injuries for both mountain bikers and hikers.
Methods A systematic search was undertaken using CINAHL, Cochrane, ProQuest, PubMed and Scopus databases.
Reviewers assessed the eligibility of articles by a title/abstract review and final full-text review.
Studies were included if the types of injuries were reported by medical personnel and contained anatomical locations.
Studies were excluded if it did not take place on a trail or if the injuries were self-reported.
Risk of bias was assessed utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists for study quality.
No meta-analysis or comparison between mountain bikers and hikers was possible due to the high heterogeneity of the definition of injury.
Results A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, 17 covering mountain biking and 7 hiking.
This represented 220,935 injured mountain bikers and 17,757 injured hikers.
The most common type of injuries sustained by mountain bikers included contusions, abrasions and minor lacerations, which made up between 45–74% of reported injuries in studies on competitive racing and 8–67% in non-competitive studies.
Fractures represented between 1.
5–43% of all reported injuries.
The most injured region was the upper limbs reported in 10 of 17 studies.
For hikers the most common injuries included blisters and ankle sprains with blisters representing 8–33% of all reported injuries.
The most common body location to be injured by hikers was a lower limb in all 7 studies.
Conclusions This is the first systematic review to report on the injury epidemiology of the two most common trail users; mountain bikers and hikers.
For participants in both activities the majority of injuries were of minor severity.
Despite this, the high proportions of upper limb fractures in mountain bikers and ankle sprains in hikers cannot be ignored.
Trial registration Registration: This systematic review was prospectively registered with the University of York PROSPERO database on the 12/4/2021 (CRD42021229623) https://www.
crd.
york.
ac.
uk/prospero/display_record.
php?ID=CRD42021229623.

Related Results

Strategi Dakwah Komunitas “Bikers Dakwah Bandung” dalam Membentuk Akhlak Anggota Komunitasnya
Strategi Dakwah Komunitas “Bikers Dakwah Bandung” dalam Membentuk Akhlak Anggota Komunitasnya
Abstract. The motorcycle community is often considered to be doing harassment on the streets such as bullying, bribes, and other negative actions, but the “Bikers Dakwah Bandung” c...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
<b>Comparison of Grip Strength in Biker and Non-Biker Students of The Islamia University of Bahawalpur</b>
<b>Comparison of Grip Strength in Biker and Non-Biker Students of The Islamia University of Bahawalpur</b>
Background: Handgrip strength (HGS) is a low-cost biomarker of muscular fitness and health risk, but whether regular motorcycling is associated with higher HGS in young adults is u...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Aktivitas Dakwah Komunitas Muslim Bikers Indonesia (KOMBI) Pekanbaru
Aktivitas Dakwah Komunitas Muslim Bikers Indonesia (KOMBI) Pekanbaru
Tulisan ini menganalisis munculnya Komunitas Muslim Bikers (KOMBI) di Pekanbaru, terutama pada aspek sosial dan gerakan dakwahnya. KOMBI menjadi fenomena baru dalam lanskap dakwah ...

Back to Top