Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Randomized prospective study to compare intubating conditions with cisatracurium or rocuronium using train-of-four neuromuscular monitoring in adult patients undergoing elective surgery

View through CrossRef
Background: Nondepolarizing skeletal muscle relaxants are used in anesthesia to ease endotracheal intubation and improve ventilation. Monitoring neuromuscular blockade is crucial to minimize residual paralysis and optimize dosing. Aims and Objectives: Our study compared the intubating score, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and clinical duration of loading dose with cisatracurium and rocuronium using train-of-four (TOF) neuromuscular monitoring during elective surgeries. Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial included 80 patients undergoing planned laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. Patients were randomized into two groups of 40 each, receiving either cisatracurium (Group A) or rocuronium (Group B). Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using TOF at the adductor pollicis longus, and intubating conditions were assessed based on jaw relaxation, Cormack–Lehane grading, vocal cord status, limb movement, and intubating score. Results: There were no statistically significant demographic differences between the groups. Rocuronium achieved a significantly shorter mean onset time for tracheal intubation (156.00±12.41 s) compared to cisatracurium (179.43±13.08 s, P<0.0001). Jaw relaxation was better in the rocuronium group (100% vs. 87.5%, P=0.0209). The mean clinical duration of loading dose in group A (38.625 min) and group B (38min; P=0.4561). Intubation conditions were rated as excellent in 80% of the rocuronium group versus 40% in the cisatracurium group (P=0.0003). Hemodynamic parameters remained stable across both groups. Conclusion: Rocuronium demonstrated superior intubating conditions and a faster onset compared to cisatracurium, making it a more effective neuromuscular blockade agent for rapid intubation in elective surgeries, whereas cisatracurium was more economical.
Title: Randomized prospective study to compare intubating conditions with cisatracurium or rocuronium using train-of-four neuromuscular monitoring in adult patients undergoing elective surgery
Description:
Background: Nondepolarizing skeletal muscle relaxants are used in anesthesia to ease endotracheal intubation and improve ventilation.
Monitoring neuromuscular blockade is crucial to minimize residual paralysis and optimize dosing.
Aims and Objectives: Our study compared the intubating score, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and clinical duration of loading dose with cisatracurium and rocuronium using train-of-four (TOF) neuromuscular monitoring during elective surgeries.
Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial included 80 patients undergoing planned laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.
Patients were randomized into two groups of 40 each, receiving either cisatracurium (Group A) or rocuronium (Group B).
Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using TOF at the adductor pollicis longus, and intubating conditions were assessed based on jaw relaxation, Cormack–Lehane grading, vocal cord status, limb movement, and intubating score.
Results: There were no statistically significant demographic differences between the groups.
Rocuronium achieved a significantly shorter mean onset time for tracheal intubation (156.
00±12.
41 s) compared to cisatracurium (179.
43±13.
08 s, P<0.
0001).
Jaw relaxation was better in the rocuronium group (100% vs.
87.
5%, P=0.
0209).
The mean clinical duration of loading dose in group A (38.
625 min) and group B (38min; P=0.
4561).
Intubation conditions were rated as excellent in 80% of the rocuronium group versus 40% in the cisatracurium group (P=0.
0003).
Hemodynamic parameters remained stable across both groups.
Conclusion: Rocuronium demonstrated superior intubating conditions and a faster onset compared to cisatracurium, making it a more effective neuromuscular blockade agent for rapid intubation in elective surgeries, whereas cisatracurium was more economical.

Related Results

ROCURONIUM VERSUS CISATRACURIUM: INTUBATING CONDITIONS, EFFICACY, AND SAFETY.
ROCURONIUM VERSUS CISATRACURIUM: INTUBATING CONDITIONS, EFFICACY, AND SAFETY.
Background: Neuromuscular blockers (NMB) are very important adjuvant to general anesthesia,Rocuronium bromide (aminosteroidal NMB) and cisatracurium besylate (benzylisoquinoline NM...
Intubating Conditions with three different doses of Rocuronium in surgery of cancer patients
Intubating Conditions with three different doses of Rocuronium in surgery of cancer patients
Background: This is a prospective randomized, double blind study to determine the doses of rocuronium that would give 90% and 95% probabilities of successful tracheal intubation wi...
Rocuronium for intubation in parturients undergoing caesarean section
Rocuronium for intubation in parturients undergoing caesarean section
Background: Anaesthetic management of a parturient is a challenge because it involves simultaneous care of both mother and baby. Succinylcholine, a depolarizing muscle relaxant is ...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract Introduction Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Intubating Conditions and First Pass Success Rate with Low Dose Rocuronium during Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Cross-sectional Study
Intubating Conditions and First Pass Success Rate with Low Dose Rocuronium during Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Cross-sectional Study
Introduction: Emergency Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) aims to reduce complications such as pulmonary aspiration, prolonged intubation with hypoxia and the occurrence of a crash a...

Back to Top