Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Quantification of the Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Nuclear Power Generation Systems

View through CrossRef
This paper statistically quantifies the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from six distinct reactor-based (boiling water reactor (BWR), pressurized water reactor (PWR), light water reactor (LWR), heavy-water-moderated reactor (HWR), gas-cooled reactor (GCR), fast breeder reactor (FBR)) nuclear power generation systems by following a two-step approach that included (a) performing a review of the lifecycle assessment (LCA) studies on the reactor-based nuclear power generation systems; and (b) statistically evaluating the lifecycle GHG emissions (expressed in grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilowatt hour, gCO2e/kWh) for each of the reactor-based nuclear power generation systems to assess the role of different types of nuclear reactors in the reduction of the lifecycle GHG emissions. Additionally, this study quantified the impacts of fuel enrichment methods (centrifuge, gaseous diffusion) on GHG emissions. The mean lifecycle GHG emissions resulting from the use of BWR (sample size, N = 15), PWR (N = 21), LWR (N = 7), HWR (N = 3), GCR (N = 1), and FBR (N = 2) in nuclear power generation systems are 14.52 gCO2e/kWh, 11.87 gCO2e/kWh, 20.5 gCO2e/kWh, 28.2 gCO2e/kWh, 8.35 gCO2e/kWh, and 6.26 gCO2e/kWh, respectively. The FBR nuclear power generation systems produced the minimum lifecycle GHGs. The centrifuge enrichment method produced lower GHG emissions than the gaseous diffusion enrichment method.
Title: Quantification of the Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Nuclear Power Generation Systems
Description:
This paper statistically quantifies the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from six distinct reactor-based (boiling water reactor (BWR), pressurized water reactor (PWR), light water reactor (LWR), heavy-water-moderated reactor (HWR), gas-cooled reactor (GCR), fast breeder reactor (FBR)) nuclear power generation systems by following a two-step approach that included (a) performing a review of the lifecycle assessment (LCA) studies on the reactor-based nuclear power generation systems; and (b) statistically evaluating the lifecycle GHG emissions (expressed in grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilowatt hour, gCO2e/kWh) for each of the reactor-based nuclear power generation systems to assess the role of different types of nuclear reactors in the reduction of the lifecycle GHG emissions.
Additionally, this study quantified the impacts of fuel enrichment methods (centrifuge, gaseous diffusion) on GHG emissions.
The mean lifecycle GHG emissions resulting from the use of BWR (sample size, N = 15), PWR (N = 21), LWR (N = 7), HWR (N = 3), GCR (N = 1), and FBR (N = 2) in nuclear power generation systems are 14.
52 gCO2e/kWh, 11.
87 gCO2e/kWh, 20.
5 gCO2e/kWh, 28.
2 gCO2e/kWh, 8.
35 gCO2e/kWh, and 6.
26 gCO2e/kWh, respectively.
The FBR nuclear power generation systems produced the minimum lifecycle GHGs.
The centrifuge enrichment method produced lower GHG emissions than the gaseous diffusion enrichment method.

Related Results

Urban Methane Emissions in Auckland, New Zealand
Urban Methane Emissions in Auckland, New Zealand
<p><b>Using a mobile survey sampling technique, my research investigates the spatial distribution of urban methane emissions in Auckland, New Zealand. The mobile survey...
Hybrid Offshore Power Generation
Hybrid Offshore Power Generation
Abstract Amid 2020 challenging business environments due to COVID-19 pandemic and strong global push towards transition to cleaner energy, PETRONAS has declared its'...
CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION STRATEGIES IN THE OIL & GAS SECTOR: A REVIEW OF PRACTICES AND IMPACT
CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION STRATEGIES IN THE OIL & GAS SECTOR: A REVIEW OF PRACTICES AND IMPACT
Climate change mitigation has become a pressing global challenge, with the oil and gas sector being a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. This review examines clim...
ROMEO - ROmanian Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas
ROMEO - ROmanian Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas
&lt;p&gt;According to UNFCCC statistics, in 2015 Romania was the country in the European Union that reported the highest emissions of CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&...
Greenhouse Technology (Co-Published With Crc Press,Uk)
Greenhouse Technology (Co-Published With Crc Press,Uk)
This book is for both teachers and students of universities and colleges who are working on, or are interested in, the subject of 'Greenhouse Technology', or in dealing with subjec...
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Extended abstract Tight sands gas, coalbed methane and shale gas are three kinds of typical unconventional natural gas. With the decrease of conventional oil and gas...
Modeling Climate Impacts of Hydrogen Transition Pathways
Modeling Climate Impacts of Hydrogen Transition Pathways
Hydrogen has emerged as a key contender for decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors, as it has the advantage of emitting no direct carbon dioxide emissions during combustion. However, ...
Peat forest disturbances in tropical regions: direct drivers and GHG emissions
Peat forest disturbances in tropical regions: direct drivers and GHG emissions
We estimated and compared driver-specific GHG (CO&#8322;, CH&#8324;, and N&#8322;O) emissions from biomass and peat soil carbon loss caused by peat forest disturbances ...

Back to Top