Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Mistrust traditions, consider innovations? The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in southern Scandinavia

View through CrossRef
For the individuals participating in the Mesolithic–Neolithic transition, one question must have recurrently emerged as a prime concern: ‘Should I mistrust traditions and consider innovations’? This concern encompassed the introduction of new material culture and new techniques of obtaining food. It also involved new ways of conceiving the world and people's place in it. And it was affected by important – sometimes catastrophic – changes in the physical environment. It must be emphasized that the question of whether to mistrust traditions and consider innovations is not only a matter of concern for prehistoric actors. It is also important for those who are making prehistory today. As is presented in this chapter, the facts presented for south Scandinavia have been variously interpreted as indicating the rapid introduction of a ‘Neolithic’ package with new ways of thinking and acting, as well as reflecting a mixture of traditions and gradually incorporated innovations. Future research into the transition should focus on combining new problem-oriented excavation with fresh ideas about how the transition from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic occurred.
Title: Mistrust traditions, consider innovations? The Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in southern Scandinavia
Description:
For the individuals participating in the Mesolithic–Neolithic transition, one question must have recurrently emerged as a prime concern: ‘Should I mistrust traditions and consider innovations’? This concern encompassed the introduction of new material culture and new techniques of obtaining food.
It also involved new ways of conceiving the world and people's place in it.
And it was affected by important – sometimes catastrophic – changes in the physical environment.
It must be emphasized that the question of whether to mistrust traditions and consider innovations is not only a matter of concern for prehistoric actors.
It is also important for those who are making prehistory today.
As is presented in this chapter, the facts presented for south Scandinavia have been variously interpreted as indicating the rapid introduction of a ‘Neolithic’ package with new ways of thinking and acting, as well as reflecting a mixture of traditions and gradually incorporated innovations.
Future research into the transition should focus on combining new problem-oriented excavation with fresh ideas about how the transition from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic occurred.

Related Results

Diversité des territoires d’origine des parures en coquillage mésolithiques de la grotte Rochefort (Saint-Pierre-sur-Erve, Mayenne)
Diversité des territoires d’origine des parures en coquillage mésolithiques de la grotte Rochefort (Saint-Pierre-sur-Erve, Mayenne)
Marine shells were constantly used as ornaments by the Mesolithic populations of Europe. The resumption of excavations in Grotte Rochefort (Saint-Pierre-sur-Erve, Mayenne, France) ...
Wild boar and domestic pigs in Mesolithic and Neolithic southern Scandinavia
Wild boar and domestic pigs in Mesolithic and Neolithic southern Scandinavia
In Mesolithic and Neolithic southern Scandinavia, Sus is often the animal found most commonly on archaeological sites, and it undoubtedly formed a major part of the meat diet throu...
Mesolitiske bosættelser ved Gudenåsystemets søer og åer
Mesolitiske bosættelser ved Gudenåsystemets søer og åer
Mesolithic settlements by the lakes and watercourses of the Gudenå systemIn the late 19th and early 20th century, several amateur archaeologists collected considerable quantities o...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Changing places: monuments and the Neolithic transition in western France
Changing places: monuments and the Neolithic transition in western France
The suggestion that monuments were not a feature of the initial Neolithic poses anew the question of the Mesolithic contribution to the earliest Neolithic of Atlantic Europe. Put b...
Response to the contribution: On Neolithic authenticity of finds from Belica by Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric
Response to the contribution: On Neolithic authenticity of finds from Belica by Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric
In the last issue of Starinar (LXII/2012) a contribution On Neolithic Authenticity of Finds from Belica was published. The authors Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric (further A-P)...
Mesolithic and Neolithic Culture of Gobustan
Mesolithic and Neolithic Culture of Gobustan
The Gobustan archaeological assemblage is one of the most important resources for studying the ancient history of Azerbaijan and the broader Caucasus. This collection of sites – co...
Navigating the Duality of Cultural Mistrust and Understanding the Declining Significance of Data Within Identity Politics
Navigating the Duality of Cultural Mistrust and Understanding the Declining Significance of Data Within Identity Politics
This study investigates the duality of cultural mistrust during highly propagandized political climates. Historically, “cultural mistrust” has aligned with Blacks' inability to be ...

Back to Top