Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Digital exclusion and people experiencing homelessness: implications for opioid use disorder care

View through CrossRef
Purpose of review People experiencing homelessness (PEH) are at increased risk of adverse consequences from opioid use disorder and other health conditions yet face multiple structural and personal barriers to accessing care. The expansion of digitized health and social care services may have improved access and efficiency of services to many in the general population but at the cost of further marginalizing PEH. Current digital exclusion mitigation strategies may not be sufficiently nuanced to address the deeply complex and challenging circumstances of PEH lives. Recent findings Providing devices, data and skills to PEH is no guarantee of increased use and benefit from digitally enabled services. Precarious and constantly mobile lives mean that maintaining sustained digital access is problematic and not always desirable. Even where digital access is secured, PEH are constrained in the range of activities they can engage with online due to privacy and other structural constraints. Justifiable distrust of institutions including healthcare colors the acceptability of digitized services for PEH. This distrust is magnified due to new inequities and vulnerabilities introduced by digitized services including the need for a digital persona, adverse outcomes from adverse digital inclusion and a widening of power imbalances. These more nuanced understandings of digital exclusion are increasingly incorporated into mitigation strategies, premised on co-production and engagement with PEH. Summary Improved engagement with digitally enabled OUD care for PEH must be prefaced by improved access to technology, optimized physical environments to maintain and use technology, and collaborative cross-sectoral efforts to build trust and engage this group through co-production and rebalanced power dynamics.
Title: Digital exclusion and people experiencing homelessness: implications for opioid use disorder care
Description:
Purpose of review People experiencing homelessness (PEH) are at increased risk of adverse consequences from opioid use disorder and other health conditions yet face multiple structural and personal barriers to accessing care.
The expansion of digitized health and social care services may have improved access and efficiency of services to many in the general population but at the cost of further marginalizing PEH.
Current digital exclusion mitigation strategies may not be sufficiently nuanced to address the deeply complex and challenging circumstances of PEH lives.
Recent findings Providing devices, data and skills to PEH is no guarantee of increased use and benefit from digitally enabled services.
Precarious and constantly mobile lives mean that maintaining sustained digital access is problematic and not always desirable.
Even where digital access is secured, PEH are constrained in the range of activities they can engage with online due to privacy and other structural constraints.
Justifiable distrust of institutions including healthcare colors the acceptability of digitized services for PEH.
This distrust is magnified due to new inequities and vulnerabilities introduced by digitized services including the need for a digital persona, adverse outcomes from adverse digital inclusion and a widening of power imbalances.
These more nuanced understandings of digital exclusion are increasingly incorporated into mitigation strategies, premised on co-production and engagement with PEH.
Summary Improved engagement with digitally enabled OUD care for PEH must be prefaced by improved access to technology, optimized physical environments to maintain and use technology, and collaborative cross-sectoral efforts to build trust and engage this group through co-production and rebalanced power dynamics.

Related Results

Access Denied
Access Denied
Introduction As social-distancing mandates in response to COVID-19 restricted in-person data collection methods such as participant observation and interviews, researchers turned t...
Effectiveness of Perioperative Opioid Educational Initiatives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Effectiveness of Perioperative Opioid Educational Initiatives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Opioids are the most commonly prescribed analgesics in the United States. Current guidelines have proposed education initiatives to reduce the risk ...
Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Scheduled Compared With Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery
Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Scheduled Compared With Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery
OBJECTIVE: To identify characteristics associated with high inpatient daily opioid consumption after cesarean delivery. METHODS: ...
Opioid use in young veterans
Opioid use in young veterans
Purpose: Data suggest an increase in prescription opioid abuse in recent years. Young veterans represent a group with major risk factors for prescription opioid abuse. The objectiv...
Comparing the safety and efficacy of intravenous naloxone administration in opioid-naive and opioid-tolerant hospitalized oncology patients
Comparing the safety and efficacy of intravenous naloxone administration in opioid-naive and opioid-tolerant hospitalized oncology patients
Objective: To compare naloxone doses and clinical outcomes after emergency opioid reversal in opioid-naïve and opioid-tolerant inpatients.Design: Cross-sectional, retrospective cha...

Back to Top