Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Aristotle on Perception

View through CrossRef
Abstract In this book, Stephen Everson offers a comprehensive investigation of Aristotle's account of perception. Everson explains how Aristotle accounts for our ability to perceive such things as colours and sounds, as well as material objects. Everson has two main aims: the first is to place Aristotle's theory of mind within the context of his natural science, in particular, to show that Aristotle's account of perception is an application of the explanatory method of the Physics. To this end, Everson is keen to emphasize, against recent interpretations, that Aristotle explains perception in terms of material changes in the organs that possess perceptual capacities. The second aim is to argue that Aristotle's resulting method of explaining mental activity has substantive advantages over contemporary accounts in the philosophy of mind, such as functionalism and supervenience. Much of Everson's argument is directed against Myles Burnyeat's interpretation of Aristotle’ philosophy of mind. According to Burnyeat, Aristotle argues that the sense organs undergo alteration without undergoing any material change: Everson calls this reading, the ‘spiritualist’ reading. Everson opposes this with the ‘literalist’ reading, according to which a sense organ is physically altered whenever it perceives something; it therefore takes on a property of the sensible object that affects it. In order to defend this reading, Everson presents a detailed account of the role of matter and material change in the perceptual activities of the each of the individual senses, and also of the perceptual system as a unified whole, including the activities of phantasia or imagination.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: Aristotle on Perception
Description:
Abstract In this book, Stephen Everson offers a comprehensive investigation of Aristotle's account of perception.
Everson explains how Aristotle accounts for our ability to perceive such things as colours and sounds, as well as material objects.
Everson has two main aims: the first is to place Aristotle's theory of mind within the context of his natural science, in particular, to show that Aristotle's account of perception is an application of the explanatory method of the Physics.
To this end, Everson is keen to emphasize, against recent interpretations, that Aristotle explains perception in terms of material changes in the organs that possess perceptual capacities.
The second aim is to argue that Aristotle's resulting method of explaining mental activity has substantive advantages over contemporary accounts in the philosophy of mind, such as functionalism and supervenience.
Much of Everson's argument is directed against Myles Burnyeat's interpretation of Aristotle’ philosophy of mind.
According to Burnyeat, Aristotle argues that the sense organs undergo alteration without undergoing any material change: Everson calls this reading, the ‘spiritualist’ reading.
Everson opposes this with the ‘literalist’ reading, according to which a sense organ is physically altered whenever it perceives something; it therefore takes on a property of the sensible object that affects it.
In order to defend this reading, Everson presents a detailed account of the role of matter and material change in the perceptual activities of the each of the individual senses, and also of the perceptual system as a unified whole, including the activities of phantasia or imagination.

Related Results

Colloquium 4: Aristotle’s Discovery of First Philosophy
Colloquium 4: Aristotle’s Discovery of First Philosophy
Abstract Among the three kinds of theoretical knowledge, Aristotle distinguishes between physics and metaphysics—what he calls Second and First Philosophy. Aristotle’s physics stud...
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?
AbstractThis book breaks new ground in the study of later ancient philosophy by examining the interplay of the two main schools of thought, Platonism and Aristotelianism, from the ...
Bilgi ve Aristoteles - Aristoteles Felsefesinde Bilginin Temellendirilmesi
Bilgi ve Aristoteles - Aristoteles Felsefesinde Bilginin Temellendirilmesi
Knowledge and Aristotle The Grounding of Knowledge in Aristotle’s Philosophy-rnKnowledge is the most important form of human relationship with being. It has been one of the most im...
Phylogenetic signal in characters from Aristotle’s History of Animals
Phylogenetic signal in characters from Aristotle’s History of Animals
The influential Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BCE) is almost unanimously acclaimed as the founder of zoology. There is a consensus that he was interested in attributes of an...
Plato and Aristotle in the Academy
Plato and Aristotle in the Academy
This chapter considers Aristotle’s criticisms of Plato. Among these are (1) Aristotle raises doubts about and rejects aspects of Plato’s theory of Forms, (2) Aristotle dismisses Pl...
Aristotle, Contract Law, and Justice in Transactions
Aristotle, Contract Law, and Justice in Transactions
This article sheds new light on Aristotle’s conception of voluntary corrective justice through an engagement with Peter Benson’s theory of transactional justice as expounded in his...
Phylogenetic Signal in Characters from Aristotle’s History of Animals
Phylogenetic Signal in Characters from Aristotle’s History of Animals
The great Greek philosopher Aristotle (384–322 BCE) is almost unanimously acclaimed as the founder of zoology. There is a consensus that he was interested in attributes o...
Aristotelian Metaphysics
Aristotelian Metaphysics
Abstract Honouring the seminal influence of David Charles to philosophical scholarship, this volume offers fresh interpretations and assessments of Aristotle’s think...

Back to Top