Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Aristotle on Perception

View through CrossRef
Abstract In this book, Stephen Everson offers a comprehensive investigation of Aristotle's account of perception. Everson explains how Aristotle accounts for our ability to perceive such things as colours and sounds, as well as material objects. Everson has two main aims: the first is to place Aristotle's theory of mind within the context of his natural science, in particular, to show that Aristotle's account of perception is an application of the explanatory method of the Physics. To this end, Everson is keen to emphasize, against recent interpretations, that Aristotle explains perception in terms of material changes in the organs that possess perceptual capacities. The second aim is to argue that Aristotle's resulting method of explaining mental activity has substantive advantages over contemporary accounts in the philosophy of mind, such as functionalism and supervenience. Much of Everson's argument is directed against Myles Burnyeat's interpretation of Aristotle’ philosophy of mind. According to Burnyeat, Aristotle argues that the sense organs undergo alteration without undergoing any material change: Everson calls this reading, the ‘spiritualist’ reading. Everson opposes this with the ‘literalist’ reading, according to which a sense organ is physically altered whenever it perceives something; it therefore takes on a property of the sensible object that affects it. In order to defend this reading, Everson presents a detailed account of the role of matter and material change in the perceptual activities of the each of the individual senses, and also of the perceptual system as a unified whole, including the activities of phantasia or imagination.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: Aristotle on Perception
Description:
Abstract In this book, Stephen Everson offers a comprehensive investigation of Aristotle's account of perception.
Everson explains how Aristotle accounts for our ability to perceive such things as colours and sounds, as well as material objects.
Everson has two main aims: the first is to place Aristotle's theory of mind within the context of his natural science, in particular, to show that Aristotle's account of perception is an application of the explanatory method of the Physics.
To this end, Everson is keen to emphasize, against recent interpretations, that Aristotle explains perception in terms of material changes in the organs that possess perceptual capacities.
The second aim is to argue that Aristotle's resulting method of explaining mental activity has substantive advantages over contemporary accounts in the philosophy of mind, such as functionalism and supervenience.
Much of Everson's argument is directed against Myles Burnyeat's interpretation of Aristotle’ philosophy of mind.
According to Burnyeat, Aristotle argues that the sense organs undergo alteration without undergoing any material change: Everson calls this reading, the ‘spiritualist’ reading.
Everson opposes this with the ‘literalist’ reading, according to which a sense organ is physically altered whenever it perceives something; it therefore takes on a property of the sensible object that affects it.
In order to defend this reading, Everson presents a detailed account of the role of matter and material change in the perceptual activities of the each of the individual senses, and also of the perceptual system as a unified whole, including the activities of phantasia or imagination.

Related Results

Bilgi ve Aristoteles - Aristoteles Felsefesinde Bilginin Temellendirilmesi
Bilgi ve Aristoteles - Aristoteles Felsefesinde Bilginin Temellendirilmesi
Knowledge and Aristotle The Grounding of Knowledge in Aristotle’s Philosophy-rnKnowledge is the most important form of human relationship with being. It has been one of the most im...
Plato and Aristotle in the Academy
Plato and Aristotle in the Academy
This chapter considers Aristotle’s criticisms of Plato. Among these are (1) Aristotle raises doubts about and rejects aspects of Plato’s theory of Forms, (2) Aristotle dismisses Pl...
Aristotelian Metaphysics
Aristotelian Metaphysics
Abstract Honouring the seminal influence of David Charles to philosophical scholarship, this volume offers fresh interpretations and assessments of Aristotle’s think...
Joyce, Aristotle, and Aquinas
Joyce, Aristotle, and Aquinas
Joyce, Aristotle and Aquinas examines the pervasive presence of Aristotle and Aquinas in the writings of James Joyce. Joyce was a philosophical writer, with a keen sense of primord...
Aristotle's Ethics
Aristotle's Ethics
Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (EN) is the first part of what Aristotle calls “a philosophy of human things” (EN X.9.1181b15), one which finds its completion in Aristotle’s Politic...
Neuropsychological approach in the investigation of time perception in late life depression
Neuropsychological approach in the investigation of time perception in late life depression
Late life depression is characterized by changes in time perception which are connected with the state of higher mental functions and their neuropsychological correlates. To the in...
Aristotelian Joyce
Aristotelian Joyce
Aristotle exerted profound influence on James Joyce, providing him with material for his work as well as guidelines for artistic creation. Joyce became familiar with Aristotle thro...
Aristotle and the Politics of Herodotus's History
Aristotle and the Politics of Herodotus's History
In the Poetics, Aristotle criticizes Herodotus by claiming that poetry is more philosophical and more serious than history. Aristotle's remark may be understood as a defense of poe...

Back to Top