Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Evolution of the subjunctive in New Persian (10th–20th): From disappearance to reappearance
View through CrossRef
AbstractThe subjunctive mood is not built with the same morpheme in Middle Persian as in Contemporary Persian. In Middle Persian it is marked with the suffix-ā-and with the prefixbe-in Contemporary Persian. Based on a corpus of eleven texts, this article will demonstrate how the Middle Persian subjunctive disappeared and how a new subjunctive form was created in New Persian. Contrary to common belief, we will see that this modal opposition indicative/subjunctive does not exist during the intermediate stages, i.e. Early New Persian (10th–11th c.) and Classical Persian (12th–19th c.). Therefore, the first value of rhematicity of the prefixbe-will be analyzed in order to explain its reuse as a modal marking, certainly with an intermediate step of perfectivity, as well as the dialectal variants in New Persian. Since this same exact evolution of disappearance and modal recreation is seen in other languages not related neither genetically nor geographically to each other, the Persian modal evolution may shed light on the reason for the reuse of an ancient present as a modal form.
Title: Evolution of the subjunctive in New Persian (10th–20th): From disappearance to reappearance
Description:
AbstractThe subjunctive mood is not built with the same morpheme in Middle Persian as in Contemporary Persian.
In Middle Persian it is marked with the suffix-ā-and with the prefixbe-in Contemporary Persian.
Based on a corpus of eleven texts, this article will demonstrate how the Middle Persian subjunctive disappeared and how a new subjunctive form was created in New Persian.
Contrary to common belief, we will see that this modal opposition indicative/subjunctive does not exist during the intermediate stages, i.
e.
Early New Persian (10th–11th c.
) and Classical Persian (12th–19th c.
).
Therefore, the first value of rhematicity of the prefixbe-will be analyzed in order to explain its reuse as a modal marking, certainly with an intermediate step of perfectivity, as well as the dialectal variants in New Persian.
Since this same exact evolution of disappearance and modal recreation is seen in other languages not related neither genetically nor geographically to each other, the Persian modal evolution may shed light on the reason for the reuse of an ancient present as a modal form.
Related Results
The Black Mass as Play: Dennis Wheatley's The Devil Rides Out
The Black Mass as Play: Dennis Wheatley's The Devil Rides Out
Literature—at least serious literature—is something that we work at. This is especially true within the academy. Literature departments are places where workers labour over texts c...
Subjunctive Conditionals
Subjunctive Conditionals
A proposal for a compositional semantics for subjunctive (or would) conditionals in English.
In this book, Michela Ippolito proposes a compositional semantics for su...
Factividade e modo verbal
Factividade e modo verbal
The traditional way of explaining the subjunctive mood in Portuguese is utterly related to the distinction made between reality and non-reality. That is, while the indicative mood ...
Lexical structure and subjunctive selection
Lexical structure and subjunctive selection
Abstract
This chapter investigates the licensing of subjunctive morphology in complement clauses in French, Modern Greek, Hungarian, and Polish. On the basis of the ...
Determining Frequency Importance Function for Speech Intelligibility of Persian Monosyllabic Words and the List of Quick Speech in Noise in Persian Language
Determining Frequency Importance Function for Speech Intelligibility of Persian Monosyllabic Words and the List of Quick Speech in Noise in Persian Language
Background and Aim: The Frequency Importance Function (FIF) is the main component of the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) for a certain language. The FIF indicates the relative i...
Perfects of Yaghnobi
Perfects of Yaghnobi
The article describes the semantics of four verb forms in the Yaghnobi language, which are formed from the Past Participle of the lexical verb and the auxiliary verb ‘to be’ or a c...
Diachronic Development of the K-suffixes: Evidence from Classical New Persian, Contemporary Written Persian, and Contemporary Spoken Persian
Diachronic Development of the K-suffixes: Evidence from Classical New Persian, Contemporary Written Persian, and Contemporary Spoken Persian
AbstractThis paper aims to investigate the usage and frequency of what we refer to as K-suffixes in Classical New Persian of the ninth to thirteenth centuries, Contemporary Written...
Features of the use of the aorist in the Persian Language
Features of the use of the aorist in the Persian Language
Examines the features of the use of the aorist tense in the Persian language. It analyzes its role in the morphosyntactic system, functions in speech, temporal and modal meanings, ...

