Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of Efficacy and Toxicity of Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Regimen VS Gemcitabine-Capecitabine Regimen as First Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Gallbladder Carcinoma
View through CrossRef
Introduction: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the commonest malignancy of the biliary tract, and majority of patients with GBC in India has advanced unresectable disease. This study was undertaken to address the efficacy, the toxicity profile and the compliance of the two different gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens in advanced unresectable GBC.
Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of two gemcitabine-based doublet chemotherapy regimens, gemcitabine-cisplatin and gemcitabine-capecitabine in patients with advanced GBC. All eligible patients were recruited from Dr. B Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati from 20.11.2020 – 20.08.2021 and randomly assigned to one of the groups of chemotherapy in 1:1 ratio.
Results: Among 250 patients with locoregionally advanced, inoperable and metastatic GBC registered at Dr B Borooah Cancer Institute, 50 patients fulfilled the criteria and were planned for recruitment for our study. After randomization, 23 patients were allotted among each of the gemcitabine-cisplatin and gemcitabine-capecitabine arms. With the median follow up time of 8 months, the median PFS (progression-free survival) and median OS (overall survival) for the entire cohort was 6 months and 8 months, respectively. Median PFS was marginally higher in the gemcitabine-cisplatin arm, in comparison to gemcitabine-capecitabine arm, but not statistically significant (6.5 months vs. 5.4 months; p = 0.793). Median OS was marginally higher in the gemcitabine-cisplatin arm, in comparison to gemcitabine-capecitabine arm, but was not statistically significant (8.5 months vs. 7.6 months; p = 0.879). The overall response rate (ORR - includes partial response [PR] and complete responses [CR]) were similar (26%) in both the arms. Non-hematological toxicities were similar with both the regimen. Hematological toxicities were found to be non-significantly higher with gemcitabine-cisplatin as compared to gemcitabine-capecitabine.
Conclusion: Gemcitabine with capecitabine in advanced GBC can alternatively be considered in first line treatment with similar OS, PFS, ORR and with acceptable toxicity profile compared to gemcitabine-cisplatin, thereby avoiding cisplatin-induced long-term toxicities
Title: Comparison of Efficacy and Toxicity of Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Regimen VS Gemcitabine-Capecitabine Regimen as First Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Gallbladder Carcinoma
Description:
Introduction: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the commonest malignancy of the biliary tract, and majority of patients with GBC in India has advanced unresectable disease.
This study was undertaken to address the efficacy, the toxicity profile and the compliance of the two different gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens in advanced unresectable GBC.
Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles of two gemcitabine-based doublet chemotherapy regimens, gemcitabine-cisplatin and gemcitabine-capecitabine in patients with advanced GBC.
All eligible patients were recruited from Dr.
B Borooah Cancer Institute, Guwahati from 20.
11.
2020 – 20.
08.
2021 and randomly assigned to one of the groups of chemotherapy in 1:1 ratio.
Results: Among 250 patients with locoregionally advanced, inoperable and metastatic GBC registered at Dr B Borooah Cancer Institute, 50 patients fulfilled the criteria and were planned for recruitment for our study.
After randomization, 23 patients were allotted among each of the gemcitabine-cisplatin and gemcitabine-capecitabine arms.
With the median follow up time of 8 months, the median PFS (progression-free survival) and median OS (overall survival) for the entire cohort was 6 months and 8 months, respectively.
Median PFS was marginally higher in the gemcitabine-cisplatin arm, in comparison to gemcitabine-capecitabine arm, but not statistically significant (6.
5 months vs.
5.
4 months; p = 0.
793).
Median OS was marginally higher in the gemcitabine-cisplatin arm, in comparison to gemcitabine-capecitabine arm, but was not statistically significant (8.
5 months vs.
7.
6 months; p = 0.
879).
The overall response rate (ORR - includes partial response [PR] and complete responses [CR]) were similar (26%) in both the arms.
Non-hematological toxicities were similar with both the regimen.
Hematological toxicities were found to be non-significantly higher with gemcitabine-cisplatin as compared to gemcitabine-capecitabine.
Conclusion: Gemcitabine with capecitabine in advanced GBC can alternatively be considered in first line treatment with similar OS, PFS, ORR and with acceptable toxicity profile compared to gemcitabine-cisplatin, thereby avoiding cisplatin-induced long-term toxicities.
Related Results
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Post treatment outcome and quality of life in patients with inoperable advanced gastric carcinoma
Post treatment outcome and quality of life in patients with inoperable advanced gastric carcinoma
Background: The outcome of treatment for advanced gastric carcinoma can vary depending on a number of factors, including the stage and aggressiveness of the cancer, the patient's o...
Abstract IA-08: Clinical advances in pancreas adenocarcinoma
Abstract IA-08: Clinical advances in pancreas adenocarcinoma
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal cancers today and is expected to be the second cause of cancer death in the coming decade. M...
Cisplatin versus gemcitabine as concurrent chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma cervix
Cisplatin versus gemcitabine as concurrent chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma cervix
Cervical cancer ranks as the four leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. It is the third most common cancer in India. Most patients present in advanced stages. Concurren...
Abstract 1761: Dual inhibition of HSP27 and FAO as a novel therapeutic strategy for cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer
Abstract 1761: Dual inhibition of HSP27 and FAO as a novel therapeutic strategy for cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer
Abstract
Cisplatin is the most commonly employed chemotherapeutic drug for ovarian cancer treatment. However, most ovarian cancer patients experience recurrent cispl...
Combining Capecitabine and Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Phase I/II Trial
Combining Capecitabine and Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Phase I/II Trial
Purpose: Preclinical studies indicate positive interactions between capecitabine, an oral fluorouracil precursor, and gemcitabine, the current standard treatment for advanced pancr...

