Javascript must be enabled to continue!
THE OUTCOMES OF THE FOREARM FLAP APPLICATIONS IN THE UPPER LIMB SEVERE INJURIES RECONSTRUCTION
View through CrossRef
Objective: Improving the outcomes of surgical treatment of upper limb (UL) injuries by using regional soft tissue flaps. Methods: The analysis of surgical interventions outcomes of integumentary tissue defects and forearm and hand structures of traumatic genesis was conducted in 37 patients. Traumatic injuries to the forearm and hand structures with soft tissue defects occurred in 11 patients, and 26 trauma patients were hospitalized. The patients had superficial soft tissue defects (STDs) involving various areas, accompanied by damage to the underlying neurovascular bundles (NVBs), tendons and bones. Results: Depending on the nature of trauma and the injured tissues’ state, the reconstruction sequence’s principle was followed. In 32 (86.5%) cases, the restoration of functional skin integument and reconstruction of injured anatomical structures of the limb were performed in a single stage. Twostage reconstruction was carried out in 5 (13.5%) patients, with initial STDs repair followed by reconstruction of the NVBs and tendons. Selection criteria for a sequence of surgical repair included the nature of the injury and the severity of the patient’s condition in emergencies. The following grafts were used: RFFF: radial forearm free flap (n=3); RRF: the reverse radial forearm flap (n=25); the ulnar reverse forearm flap (n=6), PIA: posterior interosseous artery flap (n=3). In the immediate postoperative period, compromised blood circulation in the transplanted flaps were observed in 2 (5.4%) cases. Timely diagnosis and treatment resulted in a positive outcome. Long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes of the reconstruction were considered acceptable in all patients. Conclusion: A proper surgical procedure selection for UL structures injuries and their consequences influences long term postoperative aesthetic and functional outcomes. Choice of single or multiple stages of reconstruction largely depends on the location of the defect, the state of the tissues in the recipient area and the nature of the injury to the underlying anatomical structures of the limb. Keywords: Upper limb, injuries and their consequences, soft-tissue defect, flaps.
Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
Title: THE OUTCOMES OF THE FOREARM FLAP APPLICATIONS IN THE UPPER LIMB SEVERE INJURIES RECONSTRUCTION
Description:
Objective: Improving the outcomes of surgical treatment of upper limb (UL) injuries by using regional soft tissue flaps.
Methods: The analysis of surgical interventions outcomes of integumentary tissue defects and forearm and hand structures of traumatic genesis was conducted in 37 patients.
Traumatic injuries to the forearm and hand structures with soft tissue defects occurred in 11 patients, and 26 trauma patients were hospitalized.
The patients had superficial soft tissue defects (STDs) involving various areas, accompanied by damage to the underlying neurovascular bundles (NVBs), tendons and bones.
Results: Depending on the nature of trauma and the injured tissues’ state, the reconstruction sequence’s principle was followed.
In 32 (86.
5%) cases, the restoration of functional skin integument and reconstruction of injured anatomical structures of the limb were performed in a single stage.
Twostage reconstruction was carried out in 5 (13.
5%) patients, with initial STDs repair followed by reconstruction of the NVBs and tendons.
Selection criteria for a sequence of surgical repair included the nature of the injury and the severity of the patient’s condition in emergencies.
The following grafts were used: RFFF: radial forearm free flap (n=3); RRF: the reverse radial forearm flap (n=25); the ulnar reverse forearm flap (n=6), PIA: posterior interosseous artery flap (n=3).
In the immediate postoperative period, compromised blood circulation in the transplanted flaps were observed in 2 (5.
4%) cases.
Timely diagnosis and treatment resulted in a positive outcome.
Long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes of the reconstruction were considered acceptable in all patients.
Conclusion: A proper surgical procedure selection for UL structures injuries and their consequences influences long term postoperative aesthetic and functional outcomes.
Choice of single or multiple stages of reconstruction largely depends on the location of the defect, the state of the tissues in the recipient area and the nature of the injury to the underlying anatomical structures of the limb.
Keywords: Upper limb, injuries and their consequences, soft-tissue defect, flaps.
Related Results
Oral Cancer and Reconstruction: A Serial Case Report
Oral Cancer and Reconstruction: A Serial Case Report
Introduction : The head and neck cancer are sixth most common cancers worldwide with cancer of oral cavity. The basic treatment modality for the carcinoma of oral cavity has been s...
The Combined Bra-Line Back Lift Latissimus Flap (BLBL-LAT Flap) for Aesthetic Breast Reconstruction and Simultaneous Back Contouring
The Combined Bra-Line Back Lift Latissimus Flap (BLBL-LAT Flap) for Aesthetic Breast Reconstruction and Simultaneous Back Contouring
Abstract
Background
The latissimus dorsi pedicled (LAT) flap has been a workhorse flap for breast reconstruction for many decade...
Subacute reconstruction using flap transfer for complex defects of the upper extremity
Subacute reconstruction using flap transfer for complex defects of the upper extremity
Abstract
Background Despite advances in microsurgical techniques of flap transfer, complex upper extremity trauma reconstruction remains a challenge for surgeons. This stud...
The Lateral Antebrachial Neurocutaneous Flap: A Cadaveric Study and Clinical Applications
The Lateral Antebrachial Neurocutaneous Flap: A Cadaveric Study and Clinical Applications
Abstract
Background The neurocutaneous flap is an axial pattern flap that receives a vascular supply from a vessel along its cutaneous nerve and has favorable outcomes wh...
V-shaped radial forearm free flap is a new way to reduce the morbidity of the donor area
V-shaped radial forearm free flap is a new way to reduce the morbidity of the donor area
Background. Radial forearm free flap is one of the most frequently used in the head and neck reconstruction. A significant disadvantage is the appearance of the donor site. We have...
Robotic-assisted free flap harvesting for diverse soft tissue reconstruction: a PRISMA scoping review of clinical outcomes over the last decade
Robotic-assisted free flap harvesting for diverse soft tissue reconstruction: a PRISMA scoping review of clinical outcomes over the last decade
Introduction: The aim of our study was to assess the advantages and limitations of robotic technology in diverse reconstructive procedures.Methods: A scoping review was conducted i...
UPPER EYELID RECONSTRUCTION SURGERIES; COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES BETWEEN REVERSE TENZEL FLAP VERSUS CUTLER BEARD FLAP PROCEDURE
UPPER EYELID RECONSTRUCTION SURGERIES; COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES BETWEEN REVERSE TENZEL FLAP VERSUS CUTLER BEARD FLAP PROCEDURE
Background: Objective of this study was to compare Reverse Tenzel flap and Cutler Beard flap for upper eyelid defects. Methods: This interventional study was carried out at occulop...
Clinical Application of the Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Adipofascial Flap
Clinical Application of the Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Adipofascial Flap
Background:
Skin ulcers on the anterior chest wall are caused mainly by radiation therapy for breast cancer and anterior mediastinitis after thoracotomy, and they are o...

