Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Characterization of Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Non-Detectable Circulating Tumor Cells.
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are independent predictor of progression free and overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients, with superior prognosis for patients with CTC <5 per 7.5mL of peripheral blood. However, 30-50% of patients have non-detectable CTC. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic factors in MBC patients with non-detectable CTC.Methods: This retrospective study included 271 MBC patients evaluated between January 2004 and December 2007. Median age of patients was 56 years (range: 23-82 years). CTCs were enumerated before patients started a new line of treatment using the CellSearchTM. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of CTC measurement, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit method, and compared between groups with the log-rank test.Results: Median CTC count was 2 (range: 0-1780) per 7.5 mL. CTCs were not detected in 99 (36.5%) patients, while 112 (41.3%) patients had CTC ≥ 5. Median OS for patients with 0 CTC; 1-4 CTC and ≥ 5 CTC was 29.3; 26.4; and 19.4 months (p = 0.04), respectively. Patients with brain metastasis have the highest probability of non-detectable CTC (71.4% vs. 33.6%; p = 0.001), while patients with bone metastasis are more likely to have CTC ≥ 1 (48.2% vs. 31.8%; p = 0.01). There was no association between other tumor characteristics (ER, PR, HER2, number and localization of tumor metastasis) and non-detectable CTC status. Patients with CTC = 0 have non-significantly better OS compared to patients with CTC ≥ 1 (29.3 vs. 23.3 months; p = 0.09) and have superior survival in all but one analyzed subgroups; only inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients with CTC = 0 have inferior OS compared with patients with CTC ≥ 1 (26 vs. 37 months; p = 0.67). In a subgroup of patients with non-detectable CTC, triple negative MBC has the poorest survival (median OS = 18.8 months), while hormone receptor positive MBC, without visceral metastases and non-inflammatory breast cancer has the best survival (median OS = 36.9 months). In multivariate analysis, hormone receptor status and line of therapy were only independent prognostic factors for OS in patients with non-detectable CTC (Table 1).Conclusion: Patients with non-detectable CTC before start of new line of therapy comprise a heterogeneous group of patients with substantially different prognosis. Triple negative and IBC patients represent poor prognosis subgroups. These data suggest heterogeneity of microscopic disease in advanced cancer and indicate the need to investigate combining additional detection technologies.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 3006.
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Title: Characterization of Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Non-Detectable Circulating Tumor Cells.
Description:
Abstract
Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are independent predictor of progression free and overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients, with superior prognosis for patients with CTC <5 per 7.
5mL of peripheral blood.
However, 30-50% of patients have non-detectable CTC.
The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic factors in MBC patients with non-detectable CTC.
Methods: This retrospective study included 271 MBC patients evaluated between January 2004 and December 2007.
Median age of patients was 56 years (range: 23-82 years).
CTCs were enumerated before patients started a new line of treatment using the CellSearchTM.
Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of CTC measurement, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit method, and compared between groups with the log-rank test.
Results: Median CTC count was 2 (range: 0-1780) per 7.
5 mL.
CTCs were not detected in 99 (36.
5%) patients, while 112 (41.
3%) patients had CTC ≥ 5.
Median OS for patients with 0 CTC; 1-4 CTC and ≥ 5 CTC was 29.
3; 26.
4; and 19.
4 months (p = 0.
04), respectively.
Patients with brain metastasis have the highest probability of non-detectable CTC (71.
4% vs.
33.
6%; p = 0.
001), while patients with bone metastasis are more likely to have CTC ≥ 1 (48.
2% vs.
31.
8%; p = 0.
01).
There was no association between other tumor characteristics (ER, PR, HER2, number and localization of tumor metastasis) and non-detectable CTC status.
Patients with CTC = 0 have non-significantly better OS compared to patients with CTC ≥ 1 (29.
3 vs.
23.
3 months; p = 0.
09) and have superior survival in all but one analyzed subgroups; only inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients with CTC = 0 have inferior OS compared with patients with CTC ≥ 1 (26 vs.
37 months; p = 0.
67).
In a subgroup of patients with non-detectable CTC, triple negative MBC has the poorest survival (median OS = 18.
8 months), while hormone receptor positive MBC, without visceral metastases and non-inflammatory breast cancer has the best survival (median OS = 36.
9 months).
In multivariate analysis, hormone receptor status and line of therapy were only independent prognostic factors for OS in patients with non-detectable CTC (Table 1).
Conclusion: Patients with non-detectable CTC before start of new line of therapy comprise a heterogeneous group of patients with substantially different prognosis.
Triple negative and IBC patients represent poor prognosis subgroups.
These data suggest heterogeneity of microscopic disease in advanced cancer and indicate the need to investigate combining additional detection technologies.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 3006.
Related Results
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract
IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
YAP1 and downstream gene alterations in metastatic breast cancer.
YAP1 and downstream gene alterations in metastatic breast cancer.
e13121
Background:
Metastatic breast cancer remains a major clinical challenge, characterized by poor prognosis and limited therapeuti...
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Introduction
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...

