Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Factors Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment

View through CrossRef
Background and aim: The recurrence of urinary stones occurs in two thirds of patients within a 20-year period, making urinary stones a common pathology. Among urology pathologies, kidney stones rank third behind urinary infections and conditions of the prostate. The present study intended to assess various factors affecting the extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) outcome in urinary stone treatment. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 136 urinary stone patients who underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the Department of Urology, Sahiwal Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal for the duration from September 2021 to August 2022. Computed tomography confirmed the presence of stones and measured the size (3-20 mm), distance from skin to stone, location, and density in Hounsfield units. Patient’s characteristics such as estimated rate of glomerular filtration and BMI were measured. A successful ESWL requires at least a 3mm residual renal stone fragment in post-therapy, and at least a complete clearance of ureteric stones at the end of treatment. SPSS version 26 was used for descriptive statistic. Results: Of the total 136 urinary stone patients, there were 108 (79.4%) male and 28 (20.6%) females. The incidence of stones present in proximal ureter, mid, and distal ureter was 72 (52.9%), 7 (5.1%), and 57 (41.9%) respectively. All the patients underwent ESWL 1.5 times (average), and the success rate in first, second, and third session was 67.8% (n=92), 83.8% (n=114), and 91.2% (n=124) respectively. The overall success rate of ESWL was 80.9%. A multivariate analysis revealed that HU [OR=0.89, 95% CI, 0.96-0.98, P=0.001) and stone size [OR=0.79, 95% CI, 0.62-0.98, P=0.051] were significantly affecting the first ESWL session success rate. Third session success rate was significantly affected by stone size [OR=0.76, 95% CI, 0.58-0.95, P=0.015]. Stent associated higher failure rate [OR=6.425, 95% CI, 2.132-18.235, p=0.001] and ESWL failure was three-times higher in females than in male. Conclusion: The present study found that the overall success rate of ESWL in urinary stone treatment was 80.9%. ESWL success rates were affected by stone size and HU. Patients' pain and fragmentation levels should be considered when adjusting the intensity of ESWL. Keywords: Urinary stone treatment, Outcomes, Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
Title: Factors Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment
Description:
Background and aim: The recurrence of urinary stones occurs in two thirds of patients within a 20-year period, making urinary stones a common pathology.
Among urology pathologies, kidney stones rank third behind urinary infections and conditions of the prostate.
The present study intended to assess various factors affecting the extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) outcome in urinary stone treatment.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 136 urinary stone patients who underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the Department of Urology, Sahiwal Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal for the duration from September 2021 to August 2022.
Computed tomography confirmed the presence of stones and measured the size (3-20 mm), distance from skin to stone, location, and density in Hounsfield units.
Patient’s characteristics such as estimated rate of glomerular filtration and BMI were measured.
A successful ESWL requires at least a 3mm residual renal stone fragment in post-therapy, and at least a complete clearance of ureteric stones at the end of treatment.
SPSS version 26 was used for descriptive statistic.
Results: Of the total 136 urinary stone patients, there were 108 (79.
4%) male and 28 (20.
6%) females.
The incidence of stones present in proximal ureter, mid, and distal ureter was 72 (52.
9%), 7 (5.
1%), and 57 (41.
9%) respectively.
All the patients underwent ESWL 1.
5 times (average), and the success rate in first, second, and third session was 67.
8% (n=92), 83.
8% (n=114), and 91.
2% (n=124) respectively.
The overall success rate of ESWL was 80.
9%.
A multivariate analysis revealed that HU [OR=0.
89, 95% CI, 0.
96-0.
98, P=0.
001) and stone size [OR=0.
79, 95% CI, 0.
62-0.
98, P=0.
051] were significantly affecting the first ESWL session success rate.
Third session success rate was significantly affected by stone size [OR=0.
76, 95% CI, 0.
58-0.
95, P=0.
015].
Stent associated higher failure rate [OR=6.
425, 95% CI, 2.
132-18.
235, p=0.
001] and ESWL failure was three-times higher in females than in male.
Conclusion: The present study found that the overall success rate of ESWL in urinary stone treatment was 80.
9%.
ESWL success rates were affected by stone size and HU.
Patients' pain and fragmentation levels should be considered when adjusting the intensity of ESWL.
Keywords: Urinary stone treatment, Outcomes, Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Related Results

Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Outcome Of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (Eswl) Of Lower Ureteric Stones
Urolithiasis is a prevailing urological condition, with ureteric stones affecting around 22% of cases, mostly causing severe pain and other complications. Surveillance, medical the...
Prevalence of lithotripsy complications in urinary tract stones in patients referring to Taliban hospital
Prevalence of lithotripsy complications in urinary tract stones in patients referring to Taliban hospital
Background: Lithotripsy is an effective and minimally invasive method for the treatment of urinary tract stones, reducing the need for high-risk surgeries. However, its limitations...
Treatment of urolithiasis using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Treatment of urolithiasis using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Aim: For many years extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is known for the first line of treatment of urolithiasis in Perm Regional Clinical Hospital. All of the patients were trea...
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study
<i>Objectives:</i> This study was undertaken to compare the results of laser (Ho:YAG) and pneumatic (ballistic) intracorporeal lithotripsy for ureteric calculi in terms...
<b>Comparison of Efficacy of Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones in Children</b>
<b>Comparison of Efficacy of Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones in Children</b>
Background: Pediatric nephrolithiasis, once rare, has shown a significant global rise in incidence over recent decades, presenting unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Amo...

Back to Top