Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Comparison of Biofilm Formation, Mechanical and Chemical Properties between Glass Ionomer Cement and Giomer
View through CrossRef
Aims:
The aim of this study was to compare compressive strength and its correlation with the surface morphology and chemical elements of GIC and Giomer, as well as to determine the fluoride amount effect on the bacterial biofilm formation of GIC and Giomer.
Background:
The liability of Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) mechanical properties is overcome with better antibacterial properties among restorative materials. Another fluoride-releasing restorative material, such as Giomer, has been discovered and is expected to overcome the issues with GIC’s mechanical properties; however, no research has been conducted related to antibacterial properties in Giomer.
Objective:
To compare compressive strength and its correlation with the surface morphology and chemical elements, then determine the fluoride amount effect on the bacterial biofilm formation of GIC and Giomer.
Methods:
Sixteen specimens of GIC and Giomer were prepared for a compressive strength measurement with the Universal Testing Machine. Sixteen specimens of GIC and Giomer were incubated for three days with the Streptococcus mutans culture at 37°C. The bacterial colonization was calculated using the Colony Forming Unit (CFU) and bacterial adhesion was calculated using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The mechanical properties’ compressive strength measurement, surface morphology, and chemical elements analyses were performed using SEM-EDX.
Results:
The compressive strength of Giomer was higher than GIC (P=0.001). The higher compressive strength of Giomer was reflected by a predominant regular surface, fewer voids, smaller and denser particles, and a higher content of silica and carbon. The bacterial biofilm on the surface of Giomer was higher than GIC, although there was no significant difference. GIC and Giomer have identical chemical elements: C, O, F, Na, Al, Si, P, and Ca.
Conclusion:
The compressive strength of Giomer is better than GIC; however, the biofilm formation of Giomer is higher than GIC, whereas GIC has a higher fluoride content but inferior in surfaces morphology characteristic
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Title: The Comparison of Biofilm Formation, Mechanical and Chemical Properties between Glass Ionomer Cement and Giomer
Description:
Aims:
The aim of this study was to compare compressive strength and its correlation with the surface morphology and chemical elements of GIC and Giomer, as well as to determine the fluoride amount effect on the bacterial biofilm formation of GIC and Giomer.
Background:
The liability of Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) mechanical properties is overcome with better antibacterial properties among restorative materials.
Another fluoride-releasing restorative material, such as Giomer, has been discovered and is expected to overcome the issues with GIC’s mechanical properties; however, no research has been conducted related to antibacterial properties in Giomer.
Objective:
To compare compressive strength and its correlation with the surface morphology and chemical elements, then determine the fluoride amount effect on the bacterial biofilm formation of GIC and Giomer.
Methods:
Sixteen specimens of GIC and Giomer were prepared for a compressive strength measurement with the Universal Testing Machine.
Sixteen specimens of GIC and Giomer were incubated for three days with the Streptococcus mutans culture at 37°C.
The bacterial colonization was calculated using the Colony Forming Unit (CFU) and bacterial adhesion was calculated using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).
The mechanical properties’ compressive strength measurement, surface morphology, and chemical elements analyses were performed using SEM-EDX.
Results:
The compressive strength of Giomer was higher than GIC (P=0.
001).
The higher compressive strength of Giomer was reflected by a predominant regular surface, fewer voids, smaller and denser particles, and a higher content of silica and carbon.
The bacterial biofilm on the surface of Giomer was higher than GIC, although there was no significant difference.
GIC and Giomer have identical chemical elements: C, O, F, Na, Al, Si, P, and Ca.
Conclusion:
The compressive strength of Giomer is better than GIC; however, the biofilm formation of Giomer is higher than GIC, whereas GIC has a higher fluoride content but inferior in surfaces morphology characteristic.
Related Results
EVALUATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONVENTIONAL GLASS IONOMER CEMENT AND RESIN MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER CEMENT
EVALUATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONVENTIONAL GLASS IONOMER CEMENT AND RESIN MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER CEMENT
Objectives: To assess the compressive strength of commercial resin-modifi ed glass ionomer cement with conventional glass ionomer cement.Methods and materials: Compressive strength...
On the study of polyurethane Ionomer—Part I
On the study of polyurethane Ionomer—Part I
AbstractThe reaction of toluene diisocyanate (TDI) with dimethylol propionic acid (DMPA) or diaminopentane sulphonic acid sodium salt (ES‐200) and other additives to form the struc...
A Bond Strength Study of Luted Castable Ceramic Restorations
A Bond Strength Study of Luted Castable Ceramic Restorations
Accurate intra coronal castings can be produced using a castable ceramic-DICOR®-for which there is a need to identify a suitable luting cement. The aim of this investigation was to...
The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study
The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study
This study compares the strength of the native bone-cement bond and the old-new cement bond under cyclic loading, using third generation cementing technique, rasping and contaminat...
Counterclockwise rotation of the flagellum promotes biofilm initiation in
Helicobacter pylori
Counterclockwise rotation of the flagellum promotes biofilm initiation in
Helicobacter pylori
ABSTRACT
Motility promotes biofilm initiation during the early steps of this process: microbial surface association and attachmen...
Optogenetic Modulation of a Productive Biofilm for Improved Biotransformation
Optogenetic Modulation of a Productive Biofilm for Improved Biotransformation
<p>Biofilm as a living catalysts has been exploited for the production of biofuels and bioelectricity in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) as well as in the synthesis of bu...
A comparative evaluation of microleakage in three different luting agents used for posterior full metal crown: An in vitro study
A comparative evaluation of microleakage in three different luting agents used for posterior full metal crown: An in vitro study
The purpose of the study was to evaluate and compare the microleakage at the margins of nickel – chromium full metal crowns cemented with Zinc Phosphate cement, glass ionomer cemen...
Unveiling the third dimension of glass
Unveiling the third dimension of glass
Glass as a material has always fascinated architects. Its inherent transparency has given us the ability to create diaphanous barriers between the interior and the exterior that al...

