Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Resource Perspective on Abusive Supervision and Extra-Role Behaviors: The Role of Subordinates’ Psychological Capital

View through CrossRef
Abusive supervision (perceived enduring hostile verbal and nonverbal behavior) results in a host of detrimental consequences for the individual subordinate and for the organization. In the current research, we tested whether abusive supervision relates negatively to beneficial extra-role behaviors of subordinates (individual-directed and organization-directed citizenship behaviors; OCBI and OCBO) and positively to deviant extra-role behaviors of subordinates (individual-directed and organization-directed counterproductive work behavior; CWBI and CWBO). Moreover, reasoning from a resource perspective, we examined whether subordinates’ psychological capital (PsyCap: hope, resilience, self-efficacy, and optimism) mediates these relations. PsyCap is a resource variable that is amenable to situational influences such as leadership. This makes PsyCap align with a theoretically viable, but previously not explicitly tested, mechanism underlying the effects of abusive supervision. We conducted a time-lagged, multisource study among 408 university faculty members. Abusive supervision and PsyCap were measured at Time 1 from focal participants. At Time 2, data for OCBs were collected from their supervisors and data for CWBs were collected from their peers. Results indicate that PsyCap mediated the relations between abusive supervision and OCBI, OCBO, CWBI, and CWBO. Shedding light on this process helps researchers and practitioners develop ways in which to mitigate the consequences of abusive supervision, for example, by seeking to develop PsyCap using different resources.
Title: A Resource Perspective on Abusive Supervision and Extra-Role Behaviors: The Role of Subordinates’ Psychological Capital
Description:
Abusive supervision (perceived enduring hostile verbal and nonverbal behavior) results in a host of detrimental consequences for the individual subordinate and for the organization.
In the current research, we tested whether abusive supervision relates negatively to beneficial extra-role behaviors of subordinates (individual-directed and organization-directed citizenship behaviors; OCBI and OCBO) and positively to deviant extra-role behaviors of subordinates (individual-directed and organization-directed counterproductive work behavior; CWBI and CWBO).
Moreover, reasoning from a resource perspective, we examined whether subordinates’ psychological capital (PsyCap: hope, resilience, self-efficacy, and optimism) mediates these relations.
PsyCap is a resource variable that is amenable to situational influences such as leadership.
This makes PsyCap align with a theoretically viable, but previously not explicitly tested, mechanism underlying the effects of abusive supervision.
We conducted a time-lagged, multisource study among 408 university faculty members.
Abusive supervision and PsyCap were measured at Time 1 from focal participants.
At Time 2, data for OCBs were collected from their supervisors and data for CWBs were collected from their peers.
Results indicate that PsyCap mediated the relations between abusive supervision and OCBI, OCBO, CWBI, and CWBO.
Shedding light on this process helps researchers and practitioners develop ways in which to mitigate the consequences of abusive supervision, for example, by seeking to develop PsyCap using different resources.

Related Results

Investigating Employees’ Responses to Abusive Supervision
Investigating Employees’ Responses to Abusive Supervision
Abusive supervision has been found to negatively impact employees. Extant literature based on the Social Exchange Theory (SET) has suggested that employees who experience abusive s...
The Role of Employees' Emotional Expertise in Confronting Abusive Supervision
The Role of Employees' Emotional Expertise in Confronting Abusive Supervision
Le rôle de l'expertise émotionnelle des employés face à une supervision abusive Dans un paysage organisationnel en pleine évolution désormais, il est indispensable ...
Attributions for abusive supervision: Who do subordinates blame and does it matter?
Attributions for abusive supervision: Who do subordinates blame and does it matter?
Drawing on attribution theory, we propose in Study 1 that subordinates' supervisor‐directed responses to abusive supervision depend upon their causal attributions for the abuse. Us...
Abusive supervision and employee voice: The roles of positive reappraisal and employee cynicism
Abusive supervision and employee voice: The roles of positive reappraisal and employee cynicism
PurposeDespite the number of studies on abusive supervision and voice, there is still limited knowledge on why individuals refrain themselves from information sharing. Moreover, ve...
Abusive supervision: exploring the relationship with narcissism, self-promotion and unpredictability
Abusive supervision: exploring the relationship with narcissism, self-promotion and unpredictability
PurposeThis study investigates whether subordinates who rate their managers higher on narcissism are also more likely to view their managers as abusive. In particular, the study ex...
From boredom to banditry: how abusive supervision amplifies the negative affect-time banditry relationship
From boredom to banditry: how abusive supervision amplifies the negative affect-time banditry relationship
Purpose This study examines the mediating role of negative affect in the relationship between workplace boredom and time banditry, and tests whether abusive sup...
Abusive Supervision and Its Impact on Knowledge Hiding Behavior Among Sales Force
Abusive Supervision and Its Impact on Knowledge Hiding Behavior Among Sales Force
The purpose of this study is to test the relationship between abusive supervision and employee’s knowledge hiding behavior (evasive hiding, playing dumb, rationalized hiding) among...
The Effect of Abusive Supervision on Organizational Identification: A Moderated Mediation Analysis
The Effect of Abusive Supervision on Organizational Identification: A Moderated Mediation Analysis
This study investigated the effect of abusive supervision on employee organizational identification by analyzing the mediating effect of psychological contract violation. In additi...

Back to Top