Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Global and tectonic-type physical reference models of the upper mantle

View through CrossRef
Physical 1D-average reference models of the Earth offer valuable summaries of the radial variations in rock properties and a reference for geophysical studies. PREM, in particular, has been used widely for >40 years and comprises Vp, Vs, density, radial anisotropy and attenuation profiles, while also fitting the Earth&#8217;s mass and moment of inertia. Many of PREM&#8217;s features have proven remarkably accurate, despite the limited amount of data used to construct it, but some features are inconsistent with now available data. Also, the upper mantle structure differs so much between Earth&#8217;s different tectonic environments that a global average is not quite representative of any of them.&#160; The recent growth in seismic station coverage yields very dense data sampling, globally and over different tectonic environments. Here, we use a large global dataset to construct ten 1D, multi-parameter, reference models of the upper mantle, for the globe and for 9 basic tectonic types: cratons; stable platforms; Phanerozoic continents with normal (<46.5 km) and thick (>46.5 km) crust; rifts and continental hotspots; old oceans; intermediate oceans; young oceans; backarcs.The dataset comprises Love and Rayleigh-wave phase velocities, measured using waveform inversion and all available data since 1990s; surface heat flow measurements; topography/bathymetry. With tomography-based tectonic regionalization, we identify areas within each tectonic environment and compute average dispersion curves in the 20-30 to 310 s period range, which constrain shear velocity and anisotropy in the entire upper mantle.We then use computational-petrology-based inversion to calculate 1D physical models for the globe and the 9 basic tectonic types. Our non-linear gradient search converges to true best-fitting models. The main unknowns in the inversion are the depth of the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB); the geotherm from the LAB down to 400 km depth; radial anisotropy (0-800 km). The steady-state geotherm in the lithosphere is computed from the LAB depth and the radiogenic heat production and thermal conductivity profiles by solving the conductive heat transfer equation. Rock composition and the geotherm determine the density, seismic velocities and attenuation down to 400 km. Seismic velocities in the crust, transition zone (410-660 km) and shallow lower mantle can vary to fit the data. Density below 410 km and all parameters in the core and most of the lower mantle are from PREM. Like PREM, our reference models honour the Earth's mass and moment of inertia.Small phase-velocity errors and relative data-synthetic misfits (<~0.1%) are necessary to resolve radial trade-offs in the upper-mantle structure. We achieved this by obtaining very accurate dispersion curves and by meticulously tuning the inversion, its parameterisation and regularisation.The best-fitting models have slightly depleted lithospheric mantle and fertile asthenosphere for most tectonic types. In Archean and Proterozoic continents, the mantle lithosphere is more depleted. No other compositional heterogeneities are required to fit the data. Isotropic-average seismic velocities decrease monotonically from the Moho to the LAB. The geotherms follow the mantle adiabatic temperature gradient in the asthenosphere. Our results provide useful, accurate new reference models for global and regional seismic imaging and other geophysical studies.&#160;
Title: Global and tectonic-type physical reference models of the upper mantle
Description:
Physical 1D-average reference models of the Earth offer valuable summaries of the radial variations in rock properties and a reference for geophysical studies.
PREM, in particular, has been used widely for >40 years and comprises Vp, Vs, density, radial anisotropy and attenuation profiles, while also fitting the Earth&#8217;s mass and moment of inertia.
Many of PREM&#8217;s features have proven remarkably accurate, despite the limited amount of data used to construct it, but some features are inconsistent with now available data.
Also, the upper mantle structure differs so much between Earth&#8217;s different tectonic environments that a global average is not quite representative of any of them.
&#160; The recent growth in seismic station coverage yields very dense data sampling, globally and over different tectonic environments.
Here, we use a large global dataset to construct ten 1D, multi-parameter, reference models of the upper mantle, for the globe and for 9 basic tectonic types: cratons; stable platforms; Phanerozoic continents with normal (<46.
5 km) and thick (>46.
5 km) crust; rifts and continental hotspots; old oceans; intermediate oceans; young oceans; backarcs.
The dataset comprises Love and Rayleigh-wave phase velocities, measured using waveform inversion and all available data since 1990s; surface heat flow measurements; topography/bathymetry.
With tomography-based tectonic regionalization, we identify areas within each tectonic environment and compute average dispersion curves in the 20-30 to 310 s period range, which constrain shear velocity and anisotropy in the entire upper mantle.
We then use computational-petrology-based inversion to calculate 1D physical models for the globe and the 9 basic tectonic types.
Our non-linear gradient search converges to true best-fitting models.
The main unknowns in the inversion are the depth of the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB); the geotherm from the LAB down to 400 km depth; radial anisotropy (0-800 km).
The steady-state geotherm in the lithosphere is computed from the LAB depth and the radiogenic heat production and thermal conductivity profiles by solving the conductive heat transfer equation.
Rock composition and the geotherm determine the density, seismic velocities and attenuation down to 400 km.
Seismic velocities in the crust, transition zone (410-660 km) and shallow lower mantle can vary to fit the data.
Density below 410 km and all parameters in the core and most of the lower mantle are from PREM.
Like PREM, our reference models honour the Earth's mass and moment of inertia.
Small phase-velocity errors and relative data-synthetic misfits (<~0.
1%) are necessary to resolve radial trade-offs in the upper-mantle structure.
We achieved this by obtaining very accurate dispersion curves and by meticulously tuning the inversion, its parameterisation and regularisation.
The best-fitting models have slightly depleted lithospheric mantle and fertile asthenosphere for most tectonic types.
In Archean and Proterozoic continents, the mantle lithosphere is more depleted.
No other compositional heterogeneities are required to fit the data.
Isotropic-average seismic velocities decrease monotonically from the Moho to the LAB.
The geotherms follow the mantle adiabatic temperature gradient in the asthenosphere.
Our results provide useful, accurate new reference models for global and regional seismic imaging and other geophysical studies.
&#160;.

Related Results

A study of the mantle flow field and lithospheric deformation beneath the Kuril-Kamchatka subduction zone using seismic anisotropy
A study of the mantle flow field and lithospheric deformation beneath the Kuril-Kamchatka subduction zone using seismic anisotropy
We investigate the flow field and deformation in the mantle wedge and subslab mantle beneath the Kuril-Kamchatka subduction zone using seismological data from a recently deployed s...
A systematic study of mantle drag effect on subduction dynamics and overriding plate deformation
A systematic study of mantle drag effect on subduction dynamics and overriding plate deformation
Plates and the convective mantle interact with each other over geological time scales, leading to mantle flow, plate motion, and deformation along plate boundaries. &#160;At co...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Connecting exoplanet mantle mineralogy to surface dynamic regime
Connecting exoplanet mantle mineralogy to surface dynamic regime
Based on stellar compositions, we know that rocky exoplanets show a diversity in interior compositions, and therefore mantle mineralogies. The mantle mineralogy controls physical p...
Heterogeneous lithospheric mantle
Heterogeneous lithospheric mantle
&lt;p&gt;The lithosphere is a thermal boundary layer atop mantle convection and a chemical boundary layer formed by mantle differentiation and melt extraction. The two boun...
Resolving the origin of lunar high-Ti basalts by petrologic experiments
Resolving the origin of lunar high-Ti basalts by petrologic experiments
The origin of the most primitive, picritic lunar basalts, sampled as pyroclastic glass beads in the lunar soils [1,2], remains poorly constrained. Especially the petrogenesis of hi...
Gold Content of Mantle‐Derived Rocks from Eastern China and Its Implications
Gold Content of Mantle‐Derived Rocks from Eastern China and Its Implications
Abstract We have analyzed the gold content of 65 samples of mantle‐derived xenoliths and their host rocks from eastern China, which is found to be inhomogeneous, falling in the ran...
Seismic and multi-parameter 1D reference models of the upper mantle
Seismic and multi-parameter 1D reference models of the upper mantle
&lt;p&gt;1D reference Earth models are widely used by the geoscience community and include global, regional and tectonic-type reference models. Seismic 1D profiles are used...

Back to Top