Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Health care workers' experience of personal protective equipment use and associated adverse effects during the COVID‐19 pandemic response in Singapore
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Aim
One of the greatest challenges in responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic is preventing staff exposure and infection by ensuring consistent and effective use of personal protective equipment (PPE). This study explored health care workers' experience of prolonged PPE use in clinical practice settings and their concerns regarding PPE supply, effectiveness and training needs.
Design
A descriptive cross‐sectional design was adopted in this study.
Methods
Health care workers (
N
= 592) from an acute care hospital completed an online survey from July to September 2020 assessing: (i) usage frequencies, side effects and interference with patient care; and (ii) perceptions of access to PPE, likelihood of exposure to infection and adequacy of PPE training.
Results
PPE‐related side effects were reported by 319 (53.8%) participants, the majority being nurses (88.4%) and those working in high‐risk areas such as the emergency department (39.5%), respiratory wards (acute 22.3% and non‐acute 23.8%) and COVID‐19 isolation ward (13.8%). The average time wearing PPE per shift was 6.8 h (
SD
0.39). The most commonly reported symptoms were from donning N95 masks and included: pressure injuries (45.5%), mask‐induced acne (40.4%) and burning/pain (24.5%). Some 31.3% expressed that PPE‐related side effects had negatively affected their work. The odds of having PPE‐associated side effects was higher in women (OR 2.10, 95% CI [1.29–03.42],
p
= .003) and those working in high‐risk wards (OR 3.12, 95% CI [2.17–4.60],
p
< .001]. Most (90.1%) agreed that PPE supplies were readily available, sufficient for all (86.1%) and there was sufficient training in correct PPE use (93.6%). Only 13.7% of participants reported being ‘highly confident’ of overall PPE protection.
Conclusions
Prevention and management of PPE‐related adverse effects is vital to: preserve the integrity of PPE, improve adherence and minimize viral transmission.
Impact
The high incidence of PPE‐associated pressure injuries and perception that PPE use can interfere with clinical care should inform future development of PPE products, and strategies to better equip health care workers to prevent and manage PPE‐related side effects.
Title: Health care workers' experience of personal protective equipment use and associated adverse effects during the COVID‐19 pandemic response in Singapore
Description:
Abstract
Aim
One of the greatest challenges in responding to the COVID‐19 pandemic is preventing staff exposure and infection by ensuring consistent and effective use of personal protective equipment (PPE).
This study explored health care workers' experience of prolonged PPE use in clinical practice settings and their concerns regarding PPE supply, effectiveness and training needs.
Design
A descriptive cross‐sectional design was adopted in this study.
Methods
Health care workers (
N
= 592) from an acute care hospital completed an online survey from July to September 2020 assessing: (i) usage frequencies, side effects and interference with patient care; and (ii) perceptions of access to PPE, likelihood of exposure to infection and adequacy of PPE training.
Results
PPE‐related side effects were reported by 319 (53.
8%) participants, the majority being nurses (88.
4%) and those working in high‐risk areas such as the emergency department (39.
5%), respiratory wards (acute 22.
3% and non‐acute 23.
8%) and COVID‐19 isolation ward (13.
8%).
The average time wearing PPE per shift was 6.
8 h (
SD
0.
39).
The most commonly reported symptoms were from donning N95 masks and included: pressure injuries (45.
5%), mask‐induced acne (40.
4%) and burning/pain (24.
5%).
Some 31.
3% expressed that PPE‐related side effects had negatively affected their work.
The odds of having PPE‐associated side effects was higher in women (OR 2.
10, 95% CI [1.
29–03.
42],
p
= .
003) and those working in high‐risk wards (OR 3.
12, 95% CI [2.
17–4.
60],
p
< .
001].
Most (90.
1%) agreed that PPE supplies were readily available, sufficient for all (86.
1%) and there was sufficient training in correct PPE use (93.
6%).
Only 13.
7% of participants reported being ‘highly confident’ of overall PPE protection.
Conclusions
Prevention and management of PPE‐related adverse effects is vital to: preserve the integrity of PPE, improve adherence and minimize viral transmission.
Impact
The high incidence of PPE‐associated pressure injuries and perception that PPE use can interfere with clinical care should inform future development of PPE products, and strategies to better equip health care workers to prevent and manage PPE‐related side effects.
Related Results
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
The pandemic Covid-19 currently demands teachers to be able to use technology in teaching and learning process. But in reality there are still many teachers who have not been able ...
[RETRACTED] Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED] Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies v1
[RETRACTED]Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies ==❱❱ Huge Discounts:[HURRY UP ] Absolute Keanu Reeves CBD Gummies (Available)Order Online Only!! ❰❰= https://www.facebook.com/Keanu-Reeves-CBD-G...
Use of Personal Protective Equipment in General Practice and Ambulance settings: a rapid review
Use of Personal Protective Equipment in General Practice and Ambulance settings: a rapid review
Abstract
The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is a cornerstone of infection prevention and control guidelines and was of increased importance during the C...
Utilization of personal protective equipment and its key factors among WA oil factory workers in Debre Markos town, Ethiopia
Utilization of personal protective equipment and its key factors among WA oil factory workers in Debre Markos town, Ethiopia
BackgroundEdible oil manufacturing is a labor-intensive sector with significant technological demands, where employees face various occupational hazards. The use of personal protec...
HUBUNGAN TINGKAT PENGETAHUAN DAN SIKAP DENGAN PEMAKAIAN ALAT PELINDUNG DIRI (APD) PEKERJA DI PABRIK PTPN7 KABUPATEN SELUMA
HUBUNGAN TINGKAT PENGETAHUAN DAN SIKAP DENGAN PEMAKAIAN ALAT PELINDUNG DIRI (APD) PEKERJA DI PABRIK PTPN7 KABUPATEN SELUMA
The problem that is found in the PTPN7 factory in Seluma district is that workers do not use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), PPE has been provided by the factory but not used ...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...

