Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Motor sequence learning elicits mu peak-specific corticospinal plasticity

View through CrossRef
Abstract Motor cortical (M1) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions increase corticospinal output and improve motor learning when delivered during sensorimotor mu rhythm trough but not peak phases, suggesting that the mechanisms supporting motor learning may be most active during mu trough phases. Based on these findings, we predicted that motor sequence learning-related corticospinal plasticity would be most evident when measured during mu trough phases. Healthy adults were assigned to either a sequence or no-sequence group. Participants in the sequence group practiced the implicit serial reaction time task (SRTT), which contained an embedded, repeating 12-item sequence. Participants in the no-sequence group practiced a version of the SRTT that contained no sequence. We measured mu phase-independent and mu phase-dependent MEP amplitudes using EEG-informed single-pulse TMS before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after the SRTT in both groups. All participants performed a retention test one hour after SRTT acquisition. In both groups, mu phase-independent MEP amplitudes increased following SRTT acquisition, but the pattern of mu phase-dependent MEP amplitude changes after SRTT acquisition differed between groups. Relative to the no-sequence group, the sequence group showed greater peak-specific MEP amplitude increases 30 minutes after SRTT acquisition. Further, the magnitude of these peak-specific MEP amplitude increases was negatively associated with the magnitude of sequence-specific learning. Contrary to our original hypothesis, results revealed that motor sequence-specific learning elicits peak-specific corticospinal plasticity. Findings provide first direct evidence for the presence of a mu phase-dependent motor learning mechanism in the human brain. New and Noteworthy Recent work suggests that motor learning’s neural mechanisms may be most active during specific sensorimotor mu rhythm phases. If so, motor sequence learning-induced corticospinal plasticity should be more evident during some mu phases than others. Our results show that motor sequence-specific learning elicits corticospinal plasticity that is most prominent during mu peak phases. Further, this peak-specific plasticity correlates with learning. Findings establish the presence of a mu phase-dependent motor learning mechanism in the human brain.
Title: Motor sequence learning elicits mu peak-specific corticospinal plasticity
Description:
Abstract Motor cortical (M1) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions increase corticospinal output and improve motor learning when delivered during sensorimotor mu rhythm trough but not peak phases, suggesting that the mechanisms supporting motor learning may be most active during mu trough phases.
Based on these findings, we predicted that motor sequence learning-related corticospinal plasticity would be most evident when measured during mu trough phases.
Healthy adults were assigned to either a sequence or no-sequence group.
Participants in the sequence group practiced the implicit serial reaction time task (SRTT), which contained an embedded, repeating 12-item sequence.
Participants in the no-sequence group practiced a version of the SRTT that contained no sequence.
We measured mu phase-independent and mu phase-dependent MEP amplitudes using EEG-informed single-pulse TMS before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after the SRTT in both groups.
All participants performed a retention test one hour after SRTT acquisition.
In both groups, mu phase-independent MEP amplitudes increased following SRTT acquisition, but the pattern of mu phase-dependent MEP amplitude changes after SRTT acquisition differed between groups.
Relative to the no-sequence group, the sequence group showed greater peak-specific MEP amplitude increases 30 minutes after SRTT acquisition.
Further, the magnitude of these peak-specific MEP amplitude increases was negatively associated with the magnitude of sequence-specific learning.
Contrary to our original hypothesis, results revealed that motor sequence-specific learning elicits peak-specific corticospinal plasticity.
Findings provide first direct evidence for the presence of a mu phase-dependent motor learning mechanism in the human brain.
New and Noteworthy Recent work suggests that motor learning’s neural mechanisms may be most active during specific sensorimotor mu rhythm phases.
If so, motor sequence learning-induced corticospinal plasticity should be more evident during some mu phases than others.
Our results show that motor sequence-specific learning elicits corticospinal plasticity that is most prominent during mu peak phases.
Further, this peak-specific plasticity correlates with learning.
Findings establish the presence of a mu phase-dependent motor learning mechanism in the human brain.

Related Results

miR-409-3p represses Cited2 at the evolutionary emergence of the callosal and corticospinal projections
miR-409-3p represses Cited2 at the evolutionary emergence of the callosal and corticospinal projections
Abstract Callosal projection neurons are a broad population of interhemispheric projection neurons that extend an axon across the corpus callosum...
Molecular specification of cortico-brainstem versus corticospinal projection neurons in development
Molecular specification of cortico-brainstem versus corticospinal projection neurons in development
Abstract Skilled motor control requires precise connections between subcerebral projection neurons (SCPN) in the cerebral cortex and their approp...
The Corticospinal Excitability Can Be Predicted by Spontaneous Electroencephalography Oscillations
The Corticospinal Excitability Can Be Predicted by Spontaneous Electroencephalography Oscillations
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has a wide range of clinical applications, and there is growing interest in neural oscillations and corticospinal excitability determined by...
Topographic specificity of corticospinal connections formed in explant coculture
Topographic specificity of corticospinal connections formed in explant coculture
ABSTRACT The corticospinal pathway connects layer V pyramidal neurons in discrete regions of the sensorimotor cortex to topographically matching targets in the spina...
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
CREATING LEARNING MEDIA IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 2 PAGELARAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021
The pandemic Covid-19 currently demands teachers to be able to use technology in teaching and learning process. But in reality there are still many teachers who have not been able ...
Reproductive plasticity in both sexes interacts to determine mating behaviour and fecundity
Reproductive plasticity in both sexes interacts to determine mating behaviour and fecundity
AbstractOrganisms alter their phenotype in response to variation in their environment by expressing phenotypic plasticity. Both sexes exhibit such plasticity in response to contras...
Short-term depression and long-term plasticity together tune sensitive range of synaptic plasticity
Short-term depression and long-term plasticity together tune sensitive range of synaptic plasticity
Abstract Synaptic efficacy is subjected to activity-dependent changes on short- and long time scales. While short-term changes decay over minutes, long-term modific...
Interactive effect of acute pain and motor learning acquisition on sensorimotor integration and motor learning outcomes
Interactive effect of acute pain and motor learning acquisition on sensorimotor integration and motor learning outcomes
Previous work has demonstrated differential changes in early somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) when motor learning acquisition occurred in the presence of acute pain; however,...

Back to Top