Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Elinzanetant: Efficacy and safety in the management of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women, a systematic review and meta‐analysis with grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation assessment

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Menopause is frequently associated with different symptoms and signs, such as vasomotor symptoms (VMSs), which can affect women's quality of life. While hormonal therapy is considered the traditional and most used medication for controlling these VMSs associated with menopause, neurokinin (NK) receptor antagonists resemble a novel, promising generation of medications that provide fewer adverse events compared to hormonal therapy. Elinzanetant is the first drug that can act on both NK‐1 and 3 receptors by selectively antagonizing them. It has also been developed for the management of moderate‐to‐severe VMSs. Objectives We aim to investigate the effectiveness and safety of elinzanetant compared to placebo in the management of moderate and severe VMSs that are associated with postmenopausal women. Method We conducted a search of four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus) using the following search strategy: ([Elinzanetant) OR [NT‐814] OR [BAY 3427080] OR (NK Receptor Antagonist]) AND ([Menopausal Symptoms] OR [Flashes Vasomotor Symptoms] OR (VMS)) with no search restrictions or filters applied. Selection Criteria We included randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing elinzanetant to placebo in post‐menopausal women suffering from frequent moderate‐to‐severe VMSs that reported both efficacy and safety outcomes. We used a uniform Google Sheet designed to collect data from our included RCTs. After data collection, we used Review Manager Software (RevMan) V.5.4.1. to perform all the analyses and plots using a risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) with a 95% CI for continuous outcomes. We conducted risk of bias assessment using Risk of Bias Assessment tool‐2 (ROB2). Results We included five RCTs in our review with 1699 participants. Our results reported that elinzanetant demonstrated a statistically significant difference in reducing both frequency and severity of VMSs at week 4 compared to placebo (MD = −2.75, 95% CI: [−3.83, −1.67], P  < 0.00001; MD = −0.29, 95% CI: [−0.35, −0.22], P  < 0.00001, respectively). These results were maintained at week 12 for both frequency (MD = −2.30, 95% CI: [−3.00, −1.59], P <  0.00001) and severity (MD = −0.35, 95% CI: [−0.43, −0.28], P <  0.00001). Compared to placebo, elinzanetant was associated with a higher incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: [1.03, 1.22], P  < 0.01), TEAEs causing permanent discontinuation of the study drug (RR = 2.18, 95% CI: [1.45, 3.28], P  = 0.0002), drug‐related TEAEs (RR = 1.92, 95% CI: [1.53, 2.41], P <  0.00001), headache (RR = 2.19, 95% CI: [1.38, 3.49], P  = 0.0009), somnolence (RR = 2.96, 95% CI: [1.42, 6.17], P  = 0.004), and fatigue (RR = 3.39, 95% CI: [1.77, 6.49], P  = 0.0002). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of serious TEAEs (RR = 1.70, 95% CI: [0.82, 3.54], P  = 0.15). Conclusion Elinzanetant showed significant efficacy in reducing both the frequency and severity of VMSs associated with post‐menopausal women at different time points, while concurrently improving outcomes associated with women's quality of life. While elinzanetant was associated with a higher incidence of non‐serious adverse events such as headache, somnolence, and fatigue, which led to more treatment discontinuations, it did not increase the risk of serious adverse events compared to placebo, indicating an acceptable safety profile. Conclusively, our results indicate that elinzanetant represents a promising alternative for VMS management; however, it should not replace the clinical assessment of eligibility for hormone therapy. Further studies are required to confirm its long‐term safety and sustained effectiveness. PROSPERO Registration Our study was registered on PROSPERO on September 20, 2024, with ID CRD42024593052.
Title: Elinzanetant: Efficacy and safety in the management of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women, a systematic review and meta‐analysis with grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation assessment
Description:
Abstract Background Menopause is frequently associated with different symptoms and signs, such as vasomotor symptoms (VMSs), which can affect women's quality of life.
While hormonal therapy is considered the traditional and most used medication for controlling these VMSs associated with menopause, neurokinin (NK) receptor antagonists resemble a novel, promising generation of medications that provide fewer adverse events compared to hormonal therapy.
Elinzanetant is the first drug that can act on both NK‐1 and 3 receptors by selectively antagonizing them.
It has also been developed for the management of moderate‐to‐severe VMSs.
Objectives We aim to investigate the effectiveness and safety of elinzanetant compared to placebo in the management of moderate and severe VMSs that are associated with postmenopausal women.
Method We conducted a search of four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus) using the following search strategy: ([Elinzanetant) OR [NT‐814] OR [BAY 3427080] OR (NK Receptor Antagonist]) AND ([Menopausal Symptoms] OR [Flashes Vasomotor Symptoms] OR (VMS)) with no search restrictions or filters applied.
Selection Criteria We included randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing elinzanetant to placebo in post‐menopausal women suffering from frequent moderate‐to‐severe VMSs that reported both efficacy and safety outcomes.
We used a uniform Google Sheet designed to collect data from our included RCTs.
After data collection, we used Review Manager Software (RevMan) V.
5.
4.
1.
to perform all the analyses and plots using a risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) with a 95% CI for continuous outcomes.
We conducted risk of bias assessment using Risk of Bias Assessment tool‐2 (ROB2).
Results We included five RCTs in our review with 1699 participants.
Our results reported that elinzanetant demonstrated a statistically significant difference in reducing both frequency and severity of VMSs at week 4 compared to placebo (MD = −2.
75, 95% CI: [−3.
83, −1.
67], P  < 0.
00001; MD = −0.
29, 95% CI: [−0.
35, −0.
22], P  < 0.
00001, respectively).
These results were maintained at week 12 for both frequency (MD = −2.
30, 95% CI: [−3.
00, −1.
59], P <  0.
00001) and severity (MD = −0.
35, 95% CI: [−0.
43, −0.
28], P <  0.
00001).
Compared to placebo, elinzanetant was associated with a higher incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (RR = 1.
12, 95% CI: [1.
03, 1.
22], P  < 0.
01), TEAEs causing permanent discontinuation of the study drug (RR = 2.
18, 95% CI: [1.
45, 3.
28], P  = 0.
0002), drug‐related TEAEs (RR = 1.
92, 95% CI: [1.
53, 2.
41], P <  0.
00001), headache (RR = 2.
19, 95% CI: [1.
38, 3.
49], P  = 0.
0009), somnolence (RR = 2.
96, 95% CI: [1.
42, 6.
17], P  = 0.
004), and fatigue (RR = 3.
39, 95% CI: [1.
77, 6.
49], P  = 0.
0002).
However, no statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of serious TEAEs (RR = 1.
70, 95% CI: [0.
82, 3.
54], P  = 0.
15).
Conclusion Elinzanetant showed significant efficacy in reducing both the frequency and severity of VMSs associated with post‐menopausal women at different time points, while concurrently improving outcomes associated with women's quality of life.
While elinzanetant was associated with a higher incidence of non‐serious adverse events such as headache, somnolence, and fatigue, which led to more treatment discontinuations, it did not increase the risk of serious adverse events compared to placebo, indicating an acceptable safety profile.
Conclusively, our results indicate that elinzanetant represents a promising alternative for VMS management; however, it should not replace the clinical assessment of eligibility for hormone therapy.
Further studies are required to confirm its long‐term safety and sustained effectiveness.
PROSPERO Registration Our study was registered on PROSPERO on September 20, 2024, with ID CRD42024593052.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Pregnant Prisoners in Shackles
Photo by niu niu on Unsplash ABSTRACT Shackling prisoners has been implemented as standard procedure when transporting prisoners in labor and during childbirth. This procedure ensu...
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in Australian Politics: Maintaining the Rage against the Political Machine
Women in federal politics are under-represented today and always have been. At no time in the history of the federal parliament have women achieved equal representation with men. T...
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
The Women Who Don’t Get Counted
Photo by Hédi Benyounes on Unsplash ABSTRACT The current incarceration facilities for the growing number of women are depriving expecting mothers of adequate care cruci...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...

Back to Top