Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Regulating Lobbying in International and Transnational Spheres
View through CrossRef
Lobbying is an integral part of contemporary international processes. Globalization, spread of market relations and transnational links, liberalization of national and supranational governance increased the role of interest groups in international relations. However, interest groups activities at the global level are still largely a terra incognita for international relations theory and international law which requires a more comprehensive analysis. The main goal of the article is to fill the gaps in modern IR theory as well as in theories of lobbying and interest groups by systematization of lobbying regulation experience in international and transnational spheres. Even though single approach towards formalization of international lobbying is hardly feasible, systematization of current global practices should facilitate better understanding of the nature of interest groups activity in international and transnational spheres, of potential and limits for its regulation both in sovereign states and international organizations. The article analyzes separate regulatory regimes aimed at formalizing lobbying in international and transnational spheres. There are two types of regimes: those existing on supranational level that set rules of interaction between interest groups and international organizations; those that regulate interactions of foreign interest groups and sovereign states. Analysis has demonstrated that supranational and national authorities have different approaches towards regulating their interactions with transnational interest groups. Moreover, difference exists not only between these two levels but within levels. I study supranational regulation with the cases of the European Union and the United Nations. The EU is an example of the most inclusive regulatory regime within the international organization. It technically covers all types of interest groups that wish to lobby EU officials. The UN takes a different approach – it officially regulates interactions only with international non-governmental organizations (INGOs). However, real interests behind INGOs include not only public interests but also business groups. There is an unfolding discussion within the UN over what should be the right approach towards regulating business interests. Various UN bodies have varying opinions on the issue that results in existence of various sub-regimes in the organization. The analysis of foreign lobbying regulation regimes in sovereign states has demonstrated that their development is connected mainly to political motivations of national authorities who wish to limit political and information influence by foreign interest groups while leaving economic ties and interaction with foreign business groups relatively immune to such regulation.
Academic and Educational Forum on International Relations
Title: Regulating Lobbying in International and Transnational Spheres
Description:
Lobbying is an integral part of contemporary international processes.
Globalization, spread of market relations and transnational links, liberalization of national and supranational governance increased the role of interest groups in international relations.
However, interest groups activities at the global level are still largely a terra incognita for international relations theory and international law which requires a more comprehensive analysis.
The main goal of the article is to fill the gaps in modern IR theory as well as in theories of lobbying and interest groups by systematization of lobbying regulation experience in international and transnational spheres.
Even though single approach towards formalization of international lobbying is hardly feasible, systematization of current global practices should facilitate better understanding of the nature of interest groups activity in international and transnational spheres, of potential and limits for its regulation both in sovereign states and international organizations.
The article analyzes separate regulatory regimes aimed at formalizing lobbying in international and transnational spheres.
There are two types of regimes: those existing on supranational level that set rules of interaction between interest groups and international organizations; those that regulate interactions of foreign interest groups and sovereign states.
Analysis has demonstrated that supranational and national authorities have different approaches towards regulating their interactions with transnational interest groups.
Moreover, difference exists not only between these two levels but within levels.
I study supranational regulation with the cases of the European Union and the United Nations.
The EU is an example of the most inclusive regulatory regime within the international organization.
It technically covers all types of interest groups that wish to lobby EU officials.
The UN takes a different approach – it officially regulates interactions only with international non-governmental organizations (INGOs).
However, real interests behind INGOs include not only public interests but also business groups.
There is an unfolding discussion within the UN over what should be the right approach towards regulating business interests.
Various UN bodies have varying opinions on the issue that results in existence of various sub-regimes in the organization.
The analysis of foreign lobbying regulation regimes in sovereign states has demonstrated that their development is connected mainly to political motivations of national authorities who wish to limit political and information influence by foreign interest groups while leaving economic ties and interaction with foreign business groups relatively immune to such regulation.
Related Results
Healthcare lobbying and oncology.
Healthcare lobbying and oncology.
5 Background: The healthcare industry spends more on lobbying than any other industry, with over $700 million spent in 2022. However, healthcare lobbying related specifically to c...
Essays on corruption and corporate finance
Essays on corruption and corporate finance
The essays in my dissertation investigate how political corruption affects business decisions made by firms. In the first essay (co-authored with Jacqueline Garner and Adam Yore), ...
Green Product Portfolio and Environmental Lobbying
Green Product Portfolio and Environmental Lobbying
AbstractNowadays, a growing number of firms utilize corporate lobbying to advocate for more environmentally friendly policies and regulations, deviating from the traditional lobbyi...
Collective irresponsibility: corporate reputations and the role of associations in lobbying
Collective irresponsibility: corporate reputations and the role of associations in lobbying
Abstract
Why do companies sometimes lobby legislators directly and sometimes act predominantly through business associations? Although economic factors, such as size and profita...
Transnational Perspectives in Social Work
Transnational Perspectives in Social Work
The transnational perspective contributes to the development of theoretical and practical knowledge of social work as this is conditioned and framed in contemporary dynamics of glo...
Teaching and Engaging International Students
Teaching and Engaging International Students
International student mobility has been increasingly subject to turbulences in politics, culture, economics, natural disasters, and public health. The new deca...
Innovation in corporate finance
Innovation in corporate finance
This dissertation focuses on corporate innovation. The three essays explore different aspects of how corporations manage, motivate, and use their innovation. The first essay explor...

