Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

GENDER DIFFERENCES REGARDING WORKAHOLISM AND WORK-RELATED VARIABLES

View through CrossRef
The term ‘workaholism’ was first coined by Wayne Oates (1971), and since then it has been conceptualized in a variety of ways. Most researchers agree, however, that a defining feature of workaholism is that it involves an inner compulsion to work, in which people constantly think about work (Beiler-May et al. 2017). Conclusions on workaholism are often contradictory, which may reflect a shortage of research results (Burke 1999). This also applies to research on gender differences regarding workaholism and work-related variables. The results of several studies (e.g. Burgess, Burke and Oberklaid 2006; Burke 1999; Doerfler and Kammer 1986; Spence and Robbins 1992) have been equivocal (some of them indicate that there is no relationship between gender and workaholism, while others suggest that workaholism is related to gender). The purpose of this paper is to examine gender differences in five workaholism factors and the work-related variables of perfectionism and self-handicapping. Three hundred and fourteen participants (Mean age = 29.29; SD = 12.02) took part in the study. Questionnaires were administered in a paper version. Workaholism was measured using the 25-item Work Addiction Risk Test (Robinson 1998) in Polish adaptation (Wojdyło 2005), which measures different facets of workaholism (Obsession/Compulsion, Emotional Arousal/Perfectionism; Overdoing, Outcome Orientation and Self-Worth). To test perfectionism The Polish Adaptive and Maladaptive Perfectionism Questionnaire (Szczucka 2010) was used. Self-handicapping strategies were measured using the Anticipative Strategy of Self-Esteem Protection Scale (Doliński and Szmajke 1994). Females and males were found to differ on workaholism. Women were significantly higher on average in workaholism than men (a significant difference appeared in two of the five components: Overdoing and Emotional Arousal/Perfectionism). Females also reported higher levels of maladaptive perfectionism, which is considered as a workaholic job behavior. Gender differences have also been observed in self-handicapping strategies. Women were characterized by a stronger tendency towards self-justification then men. Males, on the other hand, declared stronger emotional resilience than women. These patterns of results are consistent with the results obtained in a previous study regarding gender differences in using self-handicapping strategies (Doliński and Szmajke 1994). The obtained results can be interpreted through the prism of the roles and tasks currently given to women. On the one hand, in light of social norms, a woman should take care of the household and family, while a man is responsible for earning money to support the family (Blair-Loy 2003). On the other hand, participation of women in the workforce is increasing (Peeters, Montgomery, Bakker and Schaufeli 2005), so they may find it difficult to reconcile work and fulfilling the demands of the roles of spouses, mothers or caregivers. Our study show that women may feel more overloaded with work and they have a higher level of emotional factors than men regarding workaholism. However, one may wonder whether women’s workaholism is still underestimated.Women may find it more difficult to admit that they feel an inner compulsion to work due to gender-differentiated societal norms and expectations (Beiler-May et al. 2017: 109).
Title: GENDER DIFFERENCES REGARDING WORKAHOLISM AND WORK-RELATED VARIABLES
Description:
The term ‘workaholism’ was first coined by Wayne Oates (1971), and since then it has been conceptualized in a variety of ways.
Most researchers agree, however, that a defining feature of workaholism is that it involves an inner compulsion to work, in which people constantly think about work (Beiler-May et al.
2017).
Conclusions on workaholism are often contradictory, which may reflect a shortage of research results (Burke 1999).
This also applies to research on gender differences regarding workaholism and work-related variables.
The results of several studies (e.
g.
Burgess, Burke and Oberklaid 2006; Burke 1999; Doerfler and Kammer 1986; Spence and Robbins 1992) have been equivocal (some of them indicate that there is no relationship between gender and workaholism, while others suggest that workaholism is related to gender).
The purpose of this paper is to examine gender differences in five workaholism factors and the work-related variables of perfectionism and self-handicapping.
Three hundred and fourteen participants (Mean age = 29.
29; SD = 12.
02) took part in the study.
Questionnaires were administered in a paper version.
Workaholism was measured using the 25-item Work Addiction Risk Test (Robinson 1998) in Polish adaptation (Wojdyło 2005), which measures different facets of workaholism (Obsession/Compulsion, Emotional Arousal/Perfectionism; Overdoing, Outcome Orientation and Self-Worth).
To test perfectionism The Polish Adaptive and Maladaptive Perfectionism Questionnaire (Szczucka 2010) was used.
Self-handicapping strategies were measured using the Anticipative Strategy of Self-Esteem Protection Scale (Doliński and Szmajke 1994).
Females and males were found to differ on workaholism.
Women were significantly higher on average in workaholism than men (a significant difference appeared in two of the five components: Overdoing and Emotional Arousal/Perfectionism).
Females also reported higher levels of maladaptive perfectionism, which is considered as a workaholic job behavior.
Gender differences have also been observed in self-handicapping strategies.
Women were characterized by a stronger tendency towards self-justification then men.
Males, on the other hand, declared stronger emotional resilience than women.
These patterns of results are consistent with the results obtained in a previous study regarding gender differences in using self-handicapping strategies (Doliński and Szmajke 1994).
The obtained results can be interpreted through the prism of the roles and tasks currently given to women.
On the one hand, in light of social norms, a woman should take care of the household and family, while a man is responsible for earning money to support the family (Blair-Loy 2003).
On the other hand, participation of women in the workforce is increasing (Peeters, Montgomery, Bakker and Schaufeli 2005), so they may find it difficult to reconcile work and fulfilling the demands of the roles of spouses, mothers or caregivers.
Our study show that women may feel more overloaded with work and they have a higher level of emotional factors than men regarding workaholism.
However, one may wonder whether women’s workaholism is still underestimated.
Women may find it more difficult to admit that they feel an inner compulsion to work due to gender-differentiated societal norms and expectations (Beiler-May et al.
2017: 109).

Related Results

Workaholism and quality of work-life: a psychosocial pathway to brain-drain syndrome
Workaholism and quality of work-life: a psychosocial pathway to brain-drain syndrome
PurposeThe cultural norm of compelling employees to work beyond the standard measure as a result of internal pressure from organisations is gaining popularity in the business envir...
Workaholism Prevention in Occupational Medicine: A Systematic Review
Workaholism Prevention in Occupational Medicine: A Systematic Review
Introduction: Given the extent of workaholism identified in the literature, it seems essential to consider effective preventive measures. The purpose of this article is to summariz...
The workaholism phenomenon: a cross‐national perspective
The workaholism phenomenon: a cross‐national perspective
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the workaholism phenomenon.Design/methodology/approachWorkaholism was defined as the individual's steady and considerable allocation ...
Workaholism as a Trigger for Marital Conflict: Psychological and Legal Perspectives
Workaholism as a Trigger for Marital Conflict: Psychological and Legal Perspectives
Workaholism is a phenomenon that is increasingly prevalent in modern society. While working is a positive activity, excessive focus on work can trigger an imbalance between profess...
The socio-professional impact of workaholism on engineers
The socio-professional impact of workaholism on engineers
IntroductionWorkaholism is an “irrational commitment to excessive work” as described by Cherrington. It’s considered as an emerging phenomenon that has been the topic of much debat...
Work Values
Work Values
Research has identified TV series and, also more recently social media, as different actors in vocational socialization, providing individuals with career-related information (Levi...

Back to Top