Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Clinical Significance of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in T3-T4 Node-Negative Colorectal Cancer
View through CrossRef
This study was conducted to determine the clinical significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in cases of T3—T4 node-negative colorectal cancer. Eighty-nine patients diagnosed with T3—T4 node-negative colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection were enrolled. Tumors expressing neuroendocrine markers were classified as either low expression (≤2% cells staining positive for a neuroendocrine marker) or high expression (>" xbd="1775" xhg="1752" ybd="1323" yhg="1286"/>2% cells staining positive for a neuroendocrine marker). Immunohistochemical staining for chromogranin A and synaptophysin revealed high expression in 27 (30.3%) and 69 (77.5%) of the 89 patients, respectively. All tumors that showed high expression of chromogranin A also displayed high expression of synaptophysin. With the exception of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, no statistically significant correlation was found between neuroendocrine differentiation and all other clinicopathologic variables. Analysis using the Kaplan—Meier method and multivariate Cox regression model demonstrated that neuroendocrine differentiation for chromogranin A and synaptophysin was not associated with disease-free survival. Therefore, neuroendocrine differentiation markers would not be useful variables for prognostic assessment of patients with T3—T4 node-negative colorectal cancer.
Title: The Clinical Significance of Neuroendocrine Differentiation in T3-T4 Node-Negative Colorectal Cancer
Description:
This study was conducted to determine the clinical significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in cases of T3—T4 node-negative colorectal cancer.
Eighty-nine patients diagnosed with T3—T4 node-negative colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection were enrolled.
Tumors expressing neuroendocrine markers were classified as either low expression (≤2% cells staining positive for a neuroendocrine marker) or high expression (>" xbd="1775" xhg="1752" ybd="1323" yhg="1286"/>2% cells staining positive for a neuroendocrine marker).
Immunohistochemical staining for chromogranin A and synaptophysin revealed high expression in 27 (30.
3%) and 69 (77.
5%) of the 89 patients, respectively.
All tumors that showed high expression of chromogranin A also displayed high expression of synaptophysin.
With the exception of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, no statistically significant correlation was found between neuroendocrine differentiation and all other clinicopathologic variables.
Analysis using the Kaplan—Meier method and multivariate Cox regression model demonstrated that neuroendocrine differentiation for chromogranin A and synaptophysin was not associated with disease-free survival.
Therefore, neuroendocrine differentiation markers would not be useful variables for prognostic assessment of patients with T3—T4 node-negative colorectal cancer.
Related Results
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Predictors of False-Negative Axillary FNA Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Introduction
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is commonly used to investigate lymphadenopathy of suspected metastatic origin. The current study aims to find the association be...
Abstract A13: Applied the proteomics characteristics to detect the inherited colorectal adenomas
Abstract A13: Applied the proteomics characteristics to detect the inherited colorectal adenomas
Abstract
Introduction: Current study found that about one-third of the incidence of colorectal cancer have genetic related. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer...
Abstract 1801: FOXA1, a novel regulator of neuroendocrine differentiation
Abstract 1801: FOXA1, a novel regulator of neuroendocrine differentiation
Abstract
Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is a subtype of prostate cancer that is highly aggressive and exhibits a neuroendocrine phenotype, being distinct from...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Abstract 1690: LSD1 and CoREST2 demethylate STAT3 to promote enteroendocrine cell differentiation in mucinous colorectal cancer
Abstract 1690: LSD1 and CoREST2 demethylate STAT3 to promote enteroendocrine cell differentiation in mucinous colorectal cancer
Abstract
Across different cancer types, tumor heterogeneity has been shown to drive tumor progression, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Adenocarcinoma to neur...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
P152 CLINICAL PREDICTIVE MODEL OF LYMPH NODE METASTASIS AT RIGHT RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE ZONE IN ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
P152 CLINICAL PREDICTIVE MODEL OF LYMPH NODE METASTASIS AT RIGHT RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE ZONE IN ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
Abstract
Aim
The aim of this study is to establish a clinical predictive standard for lymph node metastasis at this location by ...
Diagnostic Rate of the Cancer by BDORT Utilizing the Cancer Slide
Diagnostic Rate of the Cancer by BDORT Utilizing the Cancer Slide
Purpose:
To make a diagnosis of cancer with BDORT (resonance test), we can choose two methods. One is to use a chemical agent like Integrin α5β1 or Oncogene C-f...

