Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Punitive Damages in Strasbourg
View through CrossRef
‘Punitive damages’ have long been controversially discussed in national as well as in international law. This is not different for the European Court of Human Rights. Until now the Court has considered it officially inappropriate. One would thus expect that punitive damages are not used by the Court. But is this really the case? This chapter finds that the Court has been at the forefront of an international trend, using just satisfaction to prevent further violations of human rights and punish wrongdoing governments in several instances. The purpose of this chapter is, first, to argue that the Court uses punitive damages implicitly and, second, that there are well-established social-science reasons why punitive damages should be used. The idea of ‘punitive damages’ is strongly connected to the effectuation of law. Wherever the enforcement might be weak, ‘punitive damages’ can set the correct incentives for following the law.
Title: Punitive Damages in Strasbourg
Description:
‘Punitive damages’ have long been controversially discussed in national as well as in international law.
This is not different for the European Court of Human Rights.
Until now the Court has considered it officially inappropriate.
One would thus expect that punitive damages are not used by the Court.
But is this really the case? This chapter finds that the Court has been at the forefront of an international trend, using just satisfaction to prevent further violations of human rights and punish wrongdoing governments in several instances.
The purpose of this chapter is, first, to argue that the Court uses punitive damages implicitly and, second, that there are well-established social-science reasons why punitive damages should be used.
The idea of ‘punitive damages’ is strongly connected to the effectuation of law.
Wherever the enforcement might be weak, ‘punitive damages’ can set the correct incentives for following the law.
Related Results
The Principle of Hadley v. Baxendale
The Principle of Hadley v. Baxendale
This chapter concerns the principle of Hadley v. Baxendale. Under this principle a promisee injured by a breach of contract can recover only those damages that either should “reaso...
Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation
Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation
Abstract
Braithwaite’s argument against punitive justice systems and for restorative justice systems establishes that there are good theoretical and empirical ground...
The EU Antitrust Damages Directive
The EU Antitrust Damages Directive
Abstract
This book provides a comprehensive review of the implementation of the Antitrust Damages Directive across a selected number of EU States. It looks at generi...
Dawn Raids Under Challenge
Dawn Raids Under Challenge
The 2nd edition of this book provides an updated comprehensive analysis of the European Commission’s dawn raid practices from a due process perspective.
Examining the obligati...
Say It with Flowers
Say It with Flowers
This chapter continues the investigation of remedies for wrongdoing. It focuses on the deficit (or ‘remainder’) that is inevitably left when a fallback duty is performed according ...

