Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Localization and characterization of N‐ethylmaleimide sensitive inhibitor(s) of thiol cathepsin activity from cultured nil and polyoma virus‐transformed Nil hamster cells

View through CrossRef
AbstractExposure of cultured Nil (a stable line of fibroblast cells from Syrian hamsters) or polyoma virus‐transformed (PyNil) hamster fibroblasts to 0.5 mM N‐ethylmaleimide for 5 minutes resulted in striking increases in thiol cathepsin activity in unfractionated cell‐free lysates. The paradoxical increase in activity of the normally N‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive cathepsins apparently occurred as the result of the protective compartmentalization of the cathepsins in the lysosomes (20,000 × g sedimented fraction) and the unprotected localization of an inhibitor(s) in the soluble cytoplasm (175,000 × g supernatant fraction). Under continuous exposure of the cells to N‐ethylmaleimide, a rapid increase in cathepsin activity (seen in the first 5 minutes) was followed by a steady decrease in activity (half inactivation time, 90 minutes). The relative difference in rates of N‐ethylmaleimide inactivation of thiol cathepsins and thiol cathepsin inhibitors provides a means for estimating lysosomal cathepsin activity in whole cell extracts without the need for more time‐consuming fractionation procedures. In reciprocal inhibition tests, it was found that, regardless of the source of cathepsins, the Nil and PyNil cathepsin inhibitor(s) inactivated the cathepsins to approximately the same extent. The inhibitors were heat stable (90–100°C for 15 minutes) at pH 4, but were totally inactivated when boiled at pH 8.5. On a calibrated Sephadex G‐100 column, the relative molecular weight (Mr) of the inhibitor(s) was 13,000 daltons. On the same column, the Mr of the cathepsins was 24,000 daltons. Compared with the cathepsin activity from Nil cells, there was about five times less cathepsin activity recoverable from the PyNil cells.
Title: Localization and characterization of N‐ethylmaleimide sensitive inhibitor(s) of thiol cathepsin activity from cultured nil and polyoma virus‐transformed Nil hamster cells
Description:
AbstractExposure of cultured Nil (a stable line of fibroblast cells from Syrian hamsters) or polyoma virus‐transformed (PyNil) hamster fibroblasts to 0.
5 mM N‐ethylmaleimide for 5 minutes resulted in striking increases in thiol cathepsin activity in unfractionated cell‐free lysates.
The paradoxical increase in activity of the normally N‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive cathepsins apparently occurred as the result of the protective compartmentalization of the cathepsins in the lysosomes (20,000 × g sedimented fraction) and the unprotected localization of an inhibitor(s) in the soluble cytoplasm (175,000 × g supernatant fraction).
Under continuous exposure of the cells to N‐ethylmaleimide, a rapid increase in cathepsin activity (seen in the first 5 minutes) was followed by a steady decrease in activity (half inactivation time, 90 minutes).
The relative difference in rates of N‐ethylmaleimide inactivation of thiol cathepsins and thiol cathepsin inhibitors provides a means for estimating lysosomal cathepsin activity in whole cell extracts without the need for more time‐consuming fractionation procedures.
In reciprocal inhibition tests, it was found that, regardless of the source of cathepsins, the Nil and PyNil cathepsin inhibitor(s) inactivated the cathepsins to approximately the same extent.
The inhibitors were heat stable (90–100°C for 15 minutes) at pH 4, but were totally inactivated when boiled at pH 8.
5.
On a calibrated Sephadex G‐100 column, the relative molecular weight (Mr) of the inhibitor(s) was 13,000 daltons.
On the same column, the Mr of the cathepsins was 24,000 daltons.
Compared with the cathepsin activity from Nil cells, there was about five times less cathepsin activity recoverable from the PyNil cells.

Related Results

Abstract 1505: The role of cathepsin B in colorectal tumorigenesis
Abstract 1505: The role of cathepsin B in colorectal tumorigenesis
Abstract Many cancers express elevated protease levels which contribute to certain aspects of tumor behavior such as growth and metastatic spread. Specifically, elev...
Cathepsin H (EC 3.4.22.16)
Cathepsin H (EC 3.4.22.16)
Abstract In 1976 Kirschke and co-workers [169] named a lysosomal peptidase cathepsin H. This enzyme was termed L20C21 in 1972 by the same authors [340] and later ...
Cathepsin B (EC 3.4.22.1)
Cathepsin B (EC 3.4.22.1)
Abstract In 1941 Fruton and co-workers [1377] proposed a classification of the proteolytic enzymes of animal tissues in which they included an enzyme that hydroly...
KECEMASAN SAAT PANDEMI COVID 19: LITERATUR REVIEW Hardiyati, Efri Widianti, Taty Hernawaty Departemen Keperawatan Jiwa Poltekkes Kemenkes Mamuju Sulbar, Universitas Pad...
Inhibition of Tumorigenicity and Metastasis of Human Melanoma Cells by Anti-Cathepsin L Single Chain Variable Fragment
Inhibition of Tumorigenicity and Metastasis of Human Melanoma Cells by Anti-Cathepsin L Single Chain Variable Fragment
Abstract We demonstrated previously that the switch from nonmetastatic to highly metastatic phenotype of human melanoma cells is directly related to secretion of pro...
Cathepsin K inhibitors promote osteoclast-osteoblast communication and engagement of osteogenesis
Cathepsin K inhibitors promote osteoclast-osteoblast communication and engagement of osteogenesis
ABSTRACT Cathepsin K inhibitors are well known for their inhibitory activity against bone resorption but, in contrast with other bone resorption antagonists, were a...
Extraction and Characterization of Cathepsin Inhibitor from Milkfish
Extraction and Characterization of Cathepsin Inhibitor from Milkfish
Proteolytic enzyme is distributed acros all organism including fish. Cysteine proteases are the largest group of proteolytic enzyme. Lysosomal cathepsin, one of cysteine protease e...

Back to Top