Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Impella RP for Patients with Acute Right Ventricular Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: A Subanalysis from the IMP-IT Registry
View through CrossRef
The use of percutaneous right ventricular assist devices (pRVADs) to support patients with right ventricular (RV)-predominant cardiogenic shock (CS) refractory to optimal medical therapy is increasing progressively, and the Impella RP is the first FDA-approved pRVAD in such a clinical scenario. The aim of the present study is to report the outcomes of patients treated with Impella RP in the IMP-IT (IMPella Mechanical Circulatory Support Device in Italy) registry, a multicenter registry that evaluated the trends in use and clinical outcomes of the Impella in the setting of CS and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in Italy. A total of 15 patients who received Impella RP were enrolled. In 40% of the patients, the main cause was ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A total of 40% of patients required biventricular support with a left Impella. Device-related complications were reported in 46.7% of patients. Overall, the in-hospital mortality was 46.7%, whereas the one-year mortality was 53.3%. The composite rate of all-cause death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and heart transplant at one year was 60%. The Impella RP has favorable survival outcomes in RV-predominant cardiogenic shock. However, the device-related complications are frequent and should be carefully weighed when considering escalation to Impella RP.
Title: Impella RP for Patients with Acute Right Ventricular Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: A Subanalysis from the IMP-IT Registry
Description:
The use of percutaneous right ventricular assist devices (pRVADs) to support patients with right ventricular (RV)-predominant cardiogenic shock (CS) refractory to optimal medical therapy is increasing progressively, and the Impella RP is the first FDA-approved pRVAD in such a clinical scenario.
The aim of the present study is to report the outcomes of patients treated with Impella RP in the IMP-IT (IMPella Mechanical Circulatory Support Device in Italy) registry, a multicenter registry that evaluated the trends in use and clinical outcomes of the Impella in the setting of CS and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention in Italy.
A total of 15 patients who received Impella RP were enrolled.
In 40% of the patients, the main cause was ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
A total of 40% of patients required biventricular support with a left Impella.
Device-related complications were reported in 46.
7% of patients.
Overall, the in-hospital mortality was 46.
7%, whereas the one-year mortality was 53.
3%.
The composite rate of all-cause death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and heart transplant at one year was 60%.
The Impella RP has favorable survival outcomes in RV-predominant cardiogenic shock.
However, the device-related complications are frequent and should be carefully weighed when considering escalation to Impella RP.
Related Results
Hemodynamic improvement with Impella RP in acute massive pulmonary embolism: a narrative review of cardiovascular outcomes and pulmonary catheter pressure assessment
Hemodynamic improvement with Impella RP in acute massive pulmonary embolism: a narrative review of cardiovascular outcomes and pulmonary catheter pressure assessment
Background:
Acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) can lead to right ventricular (RV) failure and cardiogenic shock, requiring urgent treatment. Thrombolytic therapy is ...
Abstract 4366123: Impella Use in AMI-Related Cardiogenic Shock is Associated with Increased Mortality and Complications Compared to Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump: A Propensity-Matched Real-World Analysis
Abstract 4366123: Impella Use in AMI-Related Cardiogenic Shock is Associated with Increased Mortality and Complications Compared to Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump: A Propensity-Matched Real-World Analysis
Background:
Mechanical circulatory support is often employed in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock. While Impella and IABP are w...
Pitfalls due to improper positioning of Impella®CP device for left ventricular support: a case series
Pitfalls due to improper positioning of Impella®CP device for left ventricular support: a case series
Background: The Impella® device is a type of antegrade left ventricular assist device that includes a pump catheter designed to reside in the mid-left ventricular cavity. It has re...
Renal Protection and Hemodynamic Improvement by Impella® Microaxial Pump in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
Renal Protection and Hemodynamic Improvement by Impella® Microaxial Pump in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
Acute kidney injury is one of the most frequent and prognostically relevant complications in cardiogenic shock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of th...
Single-centre experience with the Impella CP, in patients with cardiogenic shock
Single-centre experience with the Impella CP, in patients with cardiogenic shock
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
Background
...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Increasing use of the Impella®-pump in severe cardiogenic shock: a word of caution
Increasing use of the Impella®-pump in severe cardiogenic shock: a word of caution
Abstract
Impella® pumps are increasingly utilized in patients in cardiogenic shock. We report on a case series where Impella support was insufficient, and a switch t...
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute MI Does not Prevent In-Hospital Development of Cardiogenic Shock Compared to Fibrinolysis
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute MI Does not Prevent In-Hospital Development of Cardiogenic Shock Compared to Fibrinolysis
Abstract
Background
It has been speculated that invasive revascularization prevents development of cardiogenic shock. Dat...

