Javascript must be enabled to continue!
What's Happening with Child Pornography Sentencing?
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Guest editor Jelani Jefferson Exum introduces this issue of Federal Sentencing Reporter, which focuses on federal child pornography sentencing. Acknowledging the timeliness of discussing the current state of and future possibilities for child pornography sentencing, the editors of Federal Sentencing Reporter recruited submissions from those working on and thinking about this particular sentencing topic. This issue of FSR contains commentary that engages in many different angles of the child pornography sentencing debate—from the demographic of offenders, to the judicial approach to sentencing, to specifics about the Guidelines, and even to post-release issues—and covers the many problematic aspects of child pornography sentencing. Readers not only will be informed about the particularities of the sentencing process for these offenses but also will be invited to ponder (and perhaps question) the possible consequences and effects of the current posture of sentencing federal child pornography offenses.
Title: What's Happening with Child Pornography Sentencing?
Description:
Abstract
Guest editor Jelani Jefferson Exum introduces this issue of Federal Sentencing Reporter, which focuses on federal child pornography sentencing.
Acknowledging the timeliness of discussing the current state of and future possibilities for child pornography sentencing, the editors of Federal Sentencing Reporter recruited submissions from those working on and thinking about this particular sentencing topic.
This issue of FSR contains commentary that engages in many different angles of the child pornography sentencing debate—from the demographic of offenders, to the judicial approach to sentencing, to specifics about the Guidelines, and even to post-release issues—and covers the many problematic aspects of child pornography sentencing.
Readers not only will be informed about the particularities of the sentencing process for these offenses but also will be invited to ponder (and perhaps question) the possible consequences and effects of the current posture of sentencing federal child pornography offenses.
Related Results
Pornography addiction and the perimeters of acceptable pornography viewing
Pornography addiction and the perimeters of acceptable pornography viewing
In this study, we investigate how pornography addiction is constructed by members of the New Zealand public by analysing six 2016 newspaper articles focusing on pornography addicti...
A Suggestion for Making the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the U.S. Sentencing Commission Reflect the Realities of Post-Booker Sentencing
A Suggestion for Making the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the U.S. Sentencing Commission Reflect the Realities of Post-Booker Sentencing
Abstract
It has been approximately seventeen years since the Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in United States v. Booker. In Booker, the Court transformed ...
Sentencing Enhancements
Sentencing Enhancements
Sentencing enhancements are policies that mandate that people who are convicted of criminalized behaviors while engaging in generally non-criminalized behaviors—such as being in a ...
Evidence-Based Sentencing
Evidence-Based Sentencing
The evidence-based practice (EBP) movement can be traced to a 1992 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, although decision-making with empirical evidence (rat...
Pornography: The Representation of Power
Pornography: The Representation of Power
Abstract
Thedebate about pornography which feminists opened in the 1970s seems to have ended in stalemate as most advocates in the public domain begin and end with t...
Digital Child Pornography
Digital Child Pornography
Child pornography has become a major cyber crime in recent years. One of the challenging problems in child pornography cases is to distinguish if the subject files were downloaded ...
Sentencing in Chaos
Sentencing in Chaos
Abstract
Antonin Scalia famously observed in his dissent in United States v. Booker that an advisory sentencing guidelines regime would result in a “discordant symph...
Sentencing “Boat Defendants”: Breaking the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Monopoly on Gathering Data on Federal Sentencing Practices, and Why It Matters
Sentencing “Boat Defendants”: Breaking the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Monopoly on Gathering Data on Federal Sentencing Practices, and Why It Matters
Abstract
It is critically important for independent researchers, unaffiliated with sentencing commissions, to conduct vibrant sentencing data collection and rigorous...


