Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Weinstein on Sentencing

View through CrossRef
Abstract Over more than half a century of service on the federal bench Judge Weinstein has produced reams of articles, speeches, and opinions, attempting to convince higher courts and Congress to recast sentencing law on the basis of fairness. Like any great jurist, Judge Weinstein did not win every battle, but he pursued the ideal of individualized justice with unflagging dedication. In the process, he transformed sentencing law. He brought due process to sentencing by conceiving of and instituting Fatico hearings, and later became among the most powerful voices against mandatory sentencing regimes. Judge Weinstein’s ingenuity always withstood public controversy and criticism. He refused to mete out unduly harsh or unduly lenient sentences, relying instead on a commitment to reasonableness and simple fairness. While Judge Weinstein enjoyed a reputation for compassion and social consciousness, he applied the law faithfully, without disguising the difficulties inherent in the art of judging. He leaves a legacy of intellectual honesty, integrity, and faith in the promise of the law to do justice.
Title: Weinstein on Sentencing
Description:
Abstract Over more than half a century of service on the federal bench Judge Weinstein has produced reams of articles, speeches, and opinions, attempting to convince higher courts and Congress to recast sentencing law on the basis of fairness.
Like any great jurist, Judge Weinstein did not win every battle, but he pursued the ideal of individualized justice with unflagging dedication.
In the process, he transformed sentencing law.
He brought due process to sentencing by conceiving of and instituting Fatico hearings, and later became among the most powerful voices against mandatory sentencing regimes.
Judge Weinstein’s ingenuity always withstood public controversy and criticism.
He refused to mete out unduly harsh or unduly lenient sentences, relying instead on a commitment to reasonableness and simple fairness.
While Judge Weinstein enjoyed a reputation for compassion and social consciousness, he applied the law faithfully, without disguising the difficulties inherent in the art of judging.
He leaves a legacy of intellectual honesty, integrity, and faith in the promise of the law to do justice.

Related Results

Sentencing consistency in the New Zealand District Courts
Sentencing consistency in the New Zealand District Courts
<p>This thesis examines the consistency of sentencing between the circuits of the New Zealand District Courts. Four predictions based on a sequence or chain of theories incor...
Assessing Proposals for Mandatory Procedural Protections for Sentencings under the Guidelines
Assessing Proposals for Mandatory Procedural Protections for Sentencings under the Guidelines
12 Federal Sentencing Reporter 212 (2000)The federal sentencing guidelines have received sustained criticism from scholars, judges, and practitioners. Critics claim that the guidel...
What's Happening with Child Pornography Sentencing?
What's Happening with Child Pornography Sentencing?
Abstract Guest editor Jelani Jefferson Exum introduces this issue of Federal Sentencing Reporter, which focuses on federal child pornography sentencing. Acknowledgin...
Sentencing Enhancements
Sentencing Enhancements
Sentencing enhancements are policies that mandate that people who are convicted of criminalized behaviors while engaging in generally non-criminalized behaviors—such as being in a ...
Evidence-Based Sentencing
Evidence-Based Sentencing
The evidence-based practice (EBP) movement can be traced to a 1992 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, although decision-making with empirical evidence (rat...
Sentencing with Love, Not Hate
Sentencing with Love, Not Hate
Abstract Judge Jack B. Weinstein approached every sentencing with his trademark compassion and intellectual rigor. This was nowhere more evident than in two of the m...
Sentencing in Chaos
Sentencing in Chaos
Abstract Antonin Scalia famously observed in his dissent in United States v. Booker that an advisory sentencing guidelines regime would result in a “discordant symph...

Back to Top