Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Complexity of Mental Representation: A Cognitive Pragmatics Perspective
View through CrossRef
This article attempts to elucidate the meaning construction process, mental states and mental relations, communicative intentions, and action plans and thereby to explore the complexity of mental representations from a purely cognitive pragmatics perspective. It also attempts to reevaluate the violations of cooperative principle and maxims.
Cooperation, mental states and intentionality are the three basic tools for any communication process. Mental states are either conscious or unconscious. They are emotional and cognitive which include common attention, shared belief, and consciousness. Three different types of beliefs are differentiated: individual, common and shared. Intentionality is the relationship between mental acts and the external world. Every mental phenomenon has content and it is directed at an object. Two fundamental distinct meanings are attributed to the concept of intentionality: direction and deliberateness. Intentionality can be conceived of through communicative intentions and action plans.
The main concepts of communication, namely, cooperation, sharedness and intentionality are indispensable concepts to understand the process of comprehension and reconstruction of response in communication. Without rich shared knowledge, the inferential chain in non-standard communication becomes lengthy and laborious. Other possibilities arise due to the absence of the fundamental concepts, one of which is failure of communication. Any mental process can be envisaged in terms of steps starting with the expression of an act, moving through speaker meaning, to the communicative effect, then to the reaction it creates and finally the production of overt communicative response.
The paper examines the scale of complexity of mental representation and shows the underlying processes required in meaning construction. Additionally, the difference between standard and non-standard communication is presented in terms of complexity of inferential processes needed for each two different cases in communication.
University of Raparin
Title: Complexity of Mental Representation: A Cognitive Pragmatics Perspective
Description:
This article attempts to elucidate the meaning construction process, mental states and mental relations, communicative intentions, and action plans and thereby to explore the complexity of mental representations from a purely cognitive pragmatics perspective.
It also attempts to reevaluate the violations of cooperative principle and maxims.
Cooperation, mental states and intentionality are the three basic tools for any communication process.
Mental states are either conscious or unconscious.
They are emotional and cognitive which include common attention, shared belief, and consciousness.
Three different types of beliefs are differentiated: individual, common and shared.
Intentionality is the relationship between mental acts and the external world.
Every mental phenomenon has content and it is directed at an object.
Two fundamental distinct meanings are attributed to the concept of intentionality: direction and deliberateness.
Intentionality can be conceived of through communicative intentions and action plans.
The main concepts of communication, namely, cooperation, sharedness and intentionality are indispensable concepts to understand the process of comprehension and reconstruction of response in communication.
Without rich shared knowledge, the inferential chain in non-standard communication becomes lengthy and laborious.
Other possibilities arise due to the absence of the fundamental concepts, one of which is failure of communication.
Any mental process can be envisaged in terms of steps starting with the expression of an act, moving through speaker meaning, to the communicative effect, then to the reaction it creates and finally the production of overt communicative response.
The paper examines the scale of complexity of mental representation and shows the underlying processes required in meaning construction.
Additionally, the difference between standard and non-standard communication is presented in terms of complexity of inferential processes needed for each two different cases in communication.
.
Related Results
primary characteristics of English pragmatics in Applied Linguistics
primary characteristics of English pragmatics in Applied Linguistics
Pragmatics is a linguistic field that explores the complex relationship between language, context, and meaning. It involves analyzing how speakers and writers use language to conve...
Historical Pragmatics
Historical Pragmatics
Pragmatics is a branch of linguistics. In a narrow sense it studies the way in which the linguistic properties of an utterance interact with its context to provide situational inte...
Papers on pragmasemantics
Papers on pragmasemantics
Optimality theory as used in linguistics (Prince & Smolensky, 1993/2004; Smolensky & Legendre, 2006) and cognitive psychology (Gigerenzer & Selten, 2001) is a theoretic...
INTRODUCING PRAGMATICS IN USE (2ND EDITION)
INTRODUCING PRAGMATICS IN USE (2ND EDITION)
Among the array of textbooks on linguistics in general and of pragmatics in particular, Introducing Pragmatics in Use (2nd edition) has emerged as a user-friendly guide to the fiel...
Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Human Computer Interaction for AI-Driven Mental Health Support (Preprint)
Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Human Computer Interaction for AI-Driven Mental Health Support (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Mental health has become one of the most urgent global health issues of the twenty-first century. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports tha...
Interlanguage Pragmatics: An Introduction
Interlanguage Pragmatics: An Introduction
Abstract
Interlanguage pragmatics (!LP) is a second-generation hybrid. As its name betrays, ILP belongs to two different disciplines, both of which are interdiscipli...
Pragmatics and Language Evolution
Pragmatics and Language Evolution
Pragmatics is the branch of linguistics that deals with language use in context. It looks at the meaning linguistic utterances can have beyond their literal meaning (implicature), ...
ANALISIS KESEHATAN MENTAL MAHASISWA SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU KESEHATAN PANTI KOSALA
ANALISIS KESEHATAN MENTAL MAHASISWA SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU KESEHATAN PANTI KOSALA
Masalah kesehatan mental remaja mulai disadari sebagai sesuatu yang sangat penting. Survey I-NAMHS (Indonesia- National Adolescent Mental Health Survey) pada tahun 2021 di Indonesi...

