Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
View through CrossRef
Objective
To assess the effects of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions.
Methods
We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of different types of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions and were published as original papers in scientific journals. The literature search was performed in June 2021 in PubMed, Central Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Google Scholar; without restrictions in language or publication date. Two independent authors identified studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Whenever possible, meta-analyses were performed. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354).
Results
Eleven RCTs were eligible for inclusion (published from 2004 to 2017), from which nine compared enhanced versus standard counseling. Pooled estimates showed that, compared to standard counseling, enhanced counseling was associated with a higher incidence of effective contraceptive use (>3 months) (relative risk [RR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–1.16), although no significant difference was found in the incidence of long-acting reversible contraceptive use (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.68–2.29), contraceptive uptake (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98–1.15), and obstetric event occurrence (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.57–1.47). Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. In addition, two studies compared contraceptive counseling provided by physicians versus that provided by non-physicians, which did not show significant differences.
Conclusions
Enhanced contraceptive counseling may favor effective contraceptive use but may not affect the rate of obstetric event occurrence. Also, the studies did not find a difference in the effects of counseling interventions given by different providers. Since evidence certainty was very low, future well-designed RCTs are needed to make informed decisions.
Registration
The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354).
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Title: Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Description:
Objective
To assess the effects of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions.
Methods
We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of different types of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions and were published as original papers in scientific journals.
The literature search was performed in June 2021 in PubMed, Central Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Google Scholar; without restrictions in language or publication date.
Two independent authors identified studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data.
The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.
Whenever possible, meta-analyses were performed.
The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354).
Results
Eleven RCTs were eligible for inclusion (published from 2004 to 2017), from which nine compared enhanced versus standard counseling.
Pooled estimates showed that, compared to standard counseling, enhanced counseling was associated with a higher incidence of effective contraceptive use (>3 months) (relative risk [RR], 1.
12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.
09–1.
16), although no significant difference was found in the incidence of long-acting reversible contraceptive use (RR, 1.
25; 95% CI, 0.
68–2.
29), contraceptive uptake (RR, 1.
06; 95% CI, 0.
98–1.
15), and obstetric event occurrence (RR, 0.
91; 95% CI, 0.
57–1.
47).
Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes.
In addition, two studies compared contraceptive counseling provided by physicians versus that provided by non-physicians, which did not show significant differences.
Conclusions
Enhanced contraceptive counseling may favor effective contraceptive use but may not affect the rate of obstetric event occurrence.
Also, the studies did not find a difference in the effects of counseling interventions given by different providers.
Since evidence certainty was very low, future well-designed RCTs are needed to make informed decisions.
Registration
The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354).
Related Results
Intentions for post-abortion contraceptive use among women who received abortion services in health facilities of Harar city and Dire Dawa city
Intentions for post-abortion contraceptive use among women who received abortion services in health facilities of Harar city and Dire Dawa city
BackgroundA woman's specific beliefs about contraceptives influence her engagement and adherence to these methods. The intention to use post-abortion contraceptive methods is a cri...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Global Epidemiology of Induced Abortion
Global Epidemiology of Induced Abortion
Induced abortion is a common reproductive experience, with more than 73 million abortions occurring each year globally. Worldwide, the annual abortion incidence decreased in the 19...
Uptake of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Management of First Trimester Incomplete Abortion: A Cross-sectional study in central Uganda
Uptake of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Management of First Trimester Incomplete Abortion: A Cross-sectional study in central Uganda
AbstractBackgroundAlthough intrauterine devices (IUDs) are readily available in Uganda, their utilization remains low, including within post abortion care. The level and factors as...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Physicians' abortion attitudes and intentions regarding future practice
Physicians' abortion attitudes and intentions regarding future practice
Since abortion became legal in the U.S. in 1973, the number of abortions performed annually has been relatively stable, while the number of abortion providers has drastically decre...
Women Alone Modern Contraceptive use decision making and its correlates, evidence from PMA CS 2021 Survey
Women Alone Modern Contraceptive use decision making and its correlates, evidence from PMA CS 2021 Survey
AbstractBackground Women alone contraceptive decisions making has become one of the top burring public health agenda.. Despite Contraceptive method options are available and access...
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
531Human rights — Rights of women in Northern Ireland — Pregnant women and girls — Autonomy and bodily integrity — Right to respect for private and family life — Rights of persons ...

