Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Presumption of Pseudoscience. In Defense of Electrochemists Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, and Cold Fusion, of Course!
View through CrossRef
In defence of electrochemists Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, and cold fusion. With the help of science eliminated prejudices and errors, and achieved: protection produced truth, freedom for further development, the common good and internal well-being. On motives of the publications in Russian mass media. Even if cold fusion did not exist, it would still be worth inventing. The farther from the beginning of the cold nuclear fusion, the more imagination, transitions into the category of myth-making, violent perversion of facts, forgeries and unhealthy mockery of the authorities in the media and on the Internet. About the purely Russian invention in science - about the COMMISSION ON COMBATING PSEUDOSCIENCE AND FALSIFICATION OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. Evaluation of the advantages of nuclear fusion over other methods of energy production. One gram of deuterium can become a continuous heat source with a capacity of 3 kW for a whole year! There is a strong suspicion that, having mastered the method of obtaining energy from cold fusion, we will only have one step left to completely release the energy of matter according to the famous formula E = m×c2! Cold fusion or LENR? The content of the scientific paper by M. Fleischmann and S. Pons in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry with specific results. About scientific ethics, the violation of which is blamed on M. Fleischmann and S. Pons. Intense heat release, and therefore the effect itself begins only on the 66th day (~5.65×106 seconds) CONTINUOUS operation of the electrolytic cell and continues for 5 days. What kind of non-reproducibility can we talk about here? There is not a single scientific paper in peer-reviewed journals that scientifically justifies the impossibility of cold nuclear fusion. Verification of devices for measuring physical quantities must be carried out with a device that has an accuracy class higher than the device being verified. Therefore, the tests on heat in MIT and Caltech, which are often referred to on the issue of the failure of cold fusion, are not really any tests. The “experts” are lying about neutron irradiation. The Coulomb barrier, thermonuclear fusion, plasma, sounding from the lips of plasma physicists have nothing to do with cold nuclear fusion. We must understand that cold nuclear fusion is a natural process that created and synthesized the entire world around us, and this process takes place both in the bowels of the Sun and inside the Earth. It can’t be any other way. Cold nuclear fusion is not pseudoscience; it is only assumed to be pseudoscience. Long live cold fusion-the discovery of M. Fleischmann and S. Pons! And Stanley Pons should be awarded the Nobel Prize.
Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
Title: The Presumption of Pseudoscience. In Defense of Electrochemists Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, and Cold Fusion, of Course!
Description:
In defence of electrochemists Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, and cold fusion.
With the help of science eliminated prejudices and errors, and achieved: protection produced truth, freedom for further development, the common good and internal well-being.
On motives of the publications in Russian mass media.
Even if cold fusion did not exist, it would still be worth inventing.
The farther from the beginning of the cold nuclear fusion, the more imagination, transitions into the category of myth-making, violent perversion of facts, forgeries and unhealthy mockery of the authorities in the media and on the Internet.
About the purely Russian invention in science - about the COMMISSION ON COMBATING PSEUDOSCIENCE AND FALSIFICATION OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.
Evaluation of the advantages of nuclear fusion over other methods of energy production.
One gram of deuterium can become a continuous heat source with a capacity of 3 kW for a whole year! There is a strong suspicion that, having mastered the method of obtaining energy from cold fusion, we will only have one step left to completely release the energy of matter according to the famous formula E = m×c2! Cold fusion or LENR? The content of the scientific paper by M.
Fleischmann and S.
Pons in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry with specific results.
About scientific ethics, the violation of which is blamed on M.
Fleischmann and S.
Pons.
Intense heat release, and therefore the effect itself begins only on the 66th day (~5.
65×106 seconds) CONTINUOUS operation of the electrolytic cell and continues for 5 days.
What kind of non-reproducibility can we talk about here? There is not a single scientific paper in peer-reviewed journals that scientifically justifies the impossibility of cold nuclear fusion.
Verification of devices for measuring physical quantities must be carried out with a device that has an accuracy class higher than the device being verified.
Therefore, the tests on heat in MIT and Caltech, which are often referred to on the issue of the failure of cold fusion, are not really any tests.
The “experts” are lying about neutron irradiation.
The Coulomb barrier, thermonuclear fusion, plasma, sounding from the lips of plasma physicists have nothing to do with cold nuclear fusion.
We must understand that cold nuclear fusion is a natural process that created and synthesized the entire world around us, and this process takes place both in the bowels of the Sun and inside the Earth.
It can’t be any other way.
Cold nuclear fusion is not pseudoscience; it is only assumed to be pseudoscience.
Long live cold fusion-the discovery of M.
Fleischmann and S.
Pons! And Stanley Pons should be awarded the Nobel Prize.
Related Results
The Nuclear Fusion Award
The Nuclear Fusion Award
The Nuclear Fusion Award ceremony for 2009 and 2010 award winners was held during the 23rd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference in Daejeon. This time, both 2009 and 2010 award winners w...
The presumption of innocence as a constitutional phenomenon
The presumption of innocence as a constitutional phenomenon
Report. The presumption of innocence is a legal phenomenon that constantly attracts the attention of researchers. It is considered in legal science from the point of view of its or...
Pseudoscience
Pseudoscience
In a post-truth, fake news world, we are particularly susceptible to the claims of pseudoscience. When emotions and opinions are more widely disseminated than scientific findings, ...
Nonproliferation and fusion power plants
Nonproliferation and fusion power plants
Abstract
The world now appears to be on the brink of realizing commercial fusion. As fusion energy progresses towards near-term commercial deployment, the question arises a...
Effect of Ageing on Midbrain to Pons Area Ratio Using MRI: A Cross-sectional Study
Effect of Ageing on Midbrain to Pons Area Ratio Using MRI: A Cross-sectional Study
Introduction: There is brainstem atrophy with normal ageing. It is pertinent to determine, if this atrophy with ageing, is associated with significant alteration in the midbrain to...
Comparative Analysis Of A Multi-Layered Weapon System For City Air Defense In The Modern Warfare
Comparative Analysis Of A Multi-Layered Weapon System For City Air Defense In The Modern Warfare
In the era of modern warfare, urban defense is a very important aspect to maintain the security and stability of a country. Because modern war is a non-military war in which develo...
The Diverse Landscape of Fusion Transcripts in 25 Different Hematological Entities
The Diverse Landscape of Fusion Transcripts in 25 Different Hematological Entities
Background: Genomic alterations are a hallmark of hematological malignancies and comprise small nucleotide variants, copy number alterations and structural variants (SV). SV lead t...
Abstract 5171: Development of preclinical models of NTRK fusion-driven cancers
Abstract 5171: Development of preclinical models of NTRK fusion-driven cancers
Abstract
Introduction:
Oncogenic fusions involving the neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase genes, NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3 are d...

