Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Some issues of administrative offenses

View through CrossRef
The article examines the study of the content and structure of administrative offenses (torts) during martial law, specifies their theoretical and practical basis. A detailed analysis of the stages of administrative offenses during martial law is considered, the accumulated scientific information and empirical base are summarized and based on them scientific and practical proposals and recommendations for improving their legal regulation, eliminating existing gaps and conflicts, and identifies areas their further development. It is claimed that administrative offenses (torts) during martial law are an independent institution of administrative law. The types of administrative penalties applied for committing administrative military offenses are determined. It is determined that the special period is the period from the moment of announcing the decision on mobilization (except the target) or bringing it to the executors of covert mobilization or from the moment of martial law in Ukraine or in some localities and covers mobilization time, wartime and partially rebuilding period after the end of hostilities. Military administrative offenses (torts) include: refusal to comply with the lawful requirements of the commander (chief) of Art. 172-10 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; unauthorized leaving of a military unit or place of service of Art. 172-11 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; careless destruction or damage to military property Art. 172-12 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; abuse of power or official position by a military official of Art. 172-13 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; excess of power or official authority by a military official of Art. 172-14 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; careless attitude to military service Art. 172-15 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; inaction of the military authorities Art. 172-16 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; violation of the rules of combat duty of Art. 172-17 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; violation of the rules of border service of Art. 172-18 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; violation of the rules of handling weapons, as well as ammunition, explosives, other substances and objects that pose an increased danger to the environment of Art. 172-19 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; drinking alcoholic, low-alcohol beverages or using drugs, psychotropic substances or their analogues. 172-20 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses.
Title: Some issues of administrative offenses
Description:
The article examines the study of the content and structure of administrative offenses (torts) during martial law, specifies their theoretical and practical basis.
A detailed analysis of the stages of administrative offenses during martial law is considered, the accumulated scientific information and empirical base are summarized and based on them scientific and practical proposals and recommendations for improving their legal regulation, eliminating existing gaps and conflicts, and identifies areas their further development.
It is claimed that administrative offenses (torts) during martial law are an independent institution of administrative law.
The types of administrative penalties applied for committing administrative military offenses are determined.
It is determined that the special period is the period from the moment of announcing the decision on mobilization (except the target) or bringing it to the executors of covert mobilization or from the moment of martial law in Ukraine or in some localities and covers mobilization time, wartime and partially rebuilding period after the end of hostilities.
Military administrative offenses (torts) include: refusal to comply with the lawful requirements of the commander (chief) of Art.
172-10 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; unauthorized leaving of a military unit or place of service of Art.
172-11 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; careless destruction or damage to military property Art.
172-12 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; abuse of power or official position by a military official of Art.
172-13 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; excess of power or official authority by a military official of Art.
172-14 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; careless attitude to military service Art.
172-15 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; inaction of the military authorities Art.
172-16 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; violation of the rules of combat duty of Art.
172-17 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; violation of the rules of border service of Art.
172-18 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; violation of the rules of handling weapons, as well as ammunition, explosives, other substances and objects that pose an increased danger to the environment of Art.
172-19 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; drinking alcoholic, low-alcohol beverages or using drugs, psychotropic substances or their analogues.
172-20 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses.

Related Results

Disciplinary offenses of prisoners on legislation Spain
Disciplinary offenses of prisoners on legislation Spain
Subject of research: a disciplinary offense is a legal basis for bringing prisoners to justice. Purpose of the study: formulation of proposals about the possibility of using ...
Genesis of the development of administrative-tort relations
Genesis of the development of administrative-tort relations
The article examines the history of administrative tort law and administrative tort process as subsectors of administrative law and administrative process, their controversial and ...
ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE IN FOREIGN CRIMINAL LEGISLATION: HISTORY AND MODERNITY
ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE IN FOREIGN CRIMINAL LEGISLATION: HISTORY AND MODERNITY
The article investigates criminal law with administrative prejudice, as well as the history of the emergence and development of norms with administrative prejudice in the modern cr...
Once again about Administrative Responsibility
Once again about Administrative Responsibility
The institution of administrative responsibility is one of the key ones in administrative law. However, in order for it to become so, it took quite a long time, the legal support ...
SOME ISSUES OF THE DEFINITION OF MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE AND ITS TYPES
SOME ISSUES OF THE DEFINITION OF MISDEMEANOR OFFENSE AND ITS TYPES
On January 1, 2020, Law of Ukraine No. 2617-VIII «On Amendments to Some Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Simplification of Pre-Trial Investigation of Certain Criminal Offense Categor...
Women and White-Collar Crime
Women and White-Collar Crime
The inclusion of gender in the field of white-collar crime represents a relatively new and challenging area of study and research. The existing information on this topic is scarce,...
Digitalization of administrative services in Ukraine: problems and prospects of development
Digitalization of administrative services in Ukraine: problems and prospects of development
The article is devoted to clarifying and researching the current state and prospects of development of digitalization of administrative services in Ukraine as one of the main compo...

Back to Top