Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A conceptual framework for automation disengagements
View through CrossRef
AbstractA better understanding of automation disengagements can lead to improved safety and efficiency of automated systems. This study investigates the factors contributing to automation disengagements initiated by human operators and the automation itself by analyzing semi-structured interviews with 103 users of Tesla’s Autopilot and FSD Beta. The factors leading to automation disengagements are represented by categories. In total, we identified five main categories, and thirty-five subcategories. The main categories include human operator states (5), human operator’s perception of the automation (17), human operator’s perception of other humans (3), the automation’s perception of the human operator (3), and the automation incapability in the environment (7). Human operators disengaged the automation when they anticipated failure, observed unnatural or unwanted automation behavior (e.g., erratic steering, running red lights), or believed the automation is not capable to operate safely in certain environments (e.g., inclement weather, non-standard roads). Negative experiences of human operators, such as frustration, unsafe feelings, and distrust represent some of the adverse human operate states leading to automation disengagements initiated by human operators. The automation, in turn, monitored human operators and disengaged itself if it detected insufficient vigilance or speed rule violations by human operators. Moreover, human operators can be influenced by the reactions of passengers and other road users, leading them to disengage the automation if they sensed discomfort, anger, or embarrassment due to the automation’s actions. The results of the analysis are synthesized into a conceptual framework for automation disengagements, borrowing ideas from the human factor's literature and control theory. This research offers insights into the factors contributing to automation disengagements, and highlights not only the concerns of human operators but also the social aspects of this phenomenon. The findings provide information on potential edge cases of automated vehicle technology, which may help to enhance the safety and efficiency of such systems.
Title: A conceptual framework for automation disengagements
Description:
AbstractA better understanding of automation disengagements can lead to improved safety and efficiency of automated systems.
This study investigates the factors contributing to automation disengagements initiated by human operators and the automation itself by analyzing semi-structured interviews with 103 users of Tesla’s Autopilot and FSD Beta.
The factors leading to automation disengagements are represented by categories.
In total, we identified five main categories, and thirty-five subcategories.
The main categories include human operator states (5), human operator’s perception of the automation (17), human operator’s perception of other humans (3), the automation’s perception of the human operator (3), and the automation incapability in the environment (7).
Human operators disengaged the automation when they anticipated failure, observed unnatural or unwanted automation behavior (e.
g.
, erratic steering, running red lights), or believed the automation is not capable to operate safely in certain environments (e.
g.
, inclement weather, non-standard roads).
Negative experiences of human operators, such as frustration, unsafe feelings, and distrust represent some of the adverse human operate states leading to automation disengagements initiated by human operators.
The automation, in turn, monitored human operators and disengaged itself if it detected insufficient vigilance or speed rule violations by human operators.
Moreover, human operators can be influenced by the reactions of passengers and other road users, leading them to disengage the automation if they sensed discomfort, anger, or embarrassment due to the automation’s actions.
The results of the analysis are synthesized into a conceptual framework for automation disengagements, borrowing ideas from the human factor's literature and control theory.
This research offers insights into the factors contributing to automation disengagements, and highlights not only the concerns of human operators but also the social aspects of this phenomenon.
The findings provide information on potential edge cases of automated vehicle technology, which may help to enhance the safety and efficiency of such systems.
Related Results
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF MARKETING AUTOMATION ADOPTION
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF MARKETING AUTOMATION ADOPTION
Marketing automation adoption refers to the process of implementing and using marketing automation technology to streamline, automate, and measure marketing tasks and workflows. It...
Network Automation
Network Automation
Purpose: The article "Network Automation in the Contemporary Economy" explores the concepts and methods of effective network management. The application stack, Jinja template engin...
Doctrinal Engagements and Disengagements: Yongming Yanshou and His Legacies
Doctrinal Engagements and Disengagements: Yongming Yanshou and His Legacies
Abstract
This paper looks at the vexed relationship of doctrine, or teaching (C. jiao/K. kyo/J. kyō 教) in the three kindred traditions subsumed under the rubric of the Sino-East As...
Validation of UML conceptual schemas with OCL constraints and operations
Validation of UML conceptual schemas with OCL constraints and operations
Per tal de garantir la qualitat final d'un sistema d'informació, és imprescindible que l'esquema conceptual que representa el coneixement sobre el seu domini i les funcions que ha ...
In Celebration of the New “International Journal of Automation Technology”
In Celebration of the New “International Journal of Automation Technology”
I’m especially pleased to send you my congratulations on the publication of “International Journal of Automation Technology”.
The automation technology has the extremely clear p...
Initiators and Triggering Conditions for Adaptive Automation in Advanced Small Modular Reactors
Initiators and Triggering Conditions for Adaptive Automation in Advanced Small Modular Reactors
It is anticipated that Advanced Small Modular Reactors (AdvSMRs) will employ high degrees of automation. High levels of automation can enhance system performance, but often at the ...
Automation Bias and Complacency in Security Operation Centers
Automation Bias and Complacency in Security Operation Centers
The volume and complexity of alerts that security operation center (SOC) analysts must manage necessitate automation. Increased automation in SOCs amplifies the risk of automation ...
Integrating AI and RPA in Pega for Intelligent Process Automation: A Comparative Study
Integrating AI and RPA in Pega for Intelligent Process Automation: A Comparative Study
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Robotic Process Automation (RPA) within Pega’s Intelligent Process Automation (IPA) framework is fundamentally transforming ente...

