Javascript must be enabled to continue!
One stage reconstruction of mid‐face fistulous defects after maxillary sinus carcinoma resection with chimeric perforator free flaps
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundThe reconstruction of large fistulous defects following the radical ablation of maxillary sinus carcinoma remains challenging. The procedure requires not only the coverage of both intra‐nasal lining and cheek skin but also sufficient obliteration of dead space between the two surfaces. In this report, we present our experience on the reconstruction of through‐and‐through defects in the mid‐face with poly‐foliated chimeric perforator flaps.MethodsNine patients (five males and four females) who received a two‐skin paddled and one muscle segment chimeric perforator flap reconstruction after maxillary sinus carcinoma ablation between March 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed in authors' hospital. The mean age of the patients was 59.11. Six patients were diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma, two as adenoid cystic carcinoma, and one as adenocarcinoma. Brown class IIIa defects were found in eight patients, and one patient had a Brown class IVa defect. The mean size of intra‐nasal defect was 5.67 × 4.06 cm2, and the mean size of facial skin defect was 8.94 × 6.56 cm2. ALT flaps were used in five patients, LD flaps in four patients. The minor skin paddle was firstly inset to the mucosal defect site as the lining. Then, the muscle segment was inset to eliminate the dead cavity. Finally, the major skin paddle was inset to recover the cutaneous defect.ResultsIn ALT group, the mean size of the minor skin paddle was 5.7 × 4.7 cm2, and the mean size of the major skin paddle was 8.7 × 6.6 cm2. In LD group, the mean size of the minor skin paddle was 6.88 × 4.38 cm2, and the mean size of the major skin paddle was 11 × 7.75 cm2.All donor sites were closed primarily. All flaps survived and no partial flap loss was encountered. The mean follow‐up time was 14.67 months, and there were no major postoperative complications.ConclusionThe use of poly‐foliated chimeric perforator free flaps can provide functional and aesthetic coverage for extensive through‐and‐through mid‐face defects without significant donor‐site morbidities.
Title: One stage reconstruction of mid‐face fistulous defects after maxillary sinus carcinoma resection with chimeric perforator free flaps
Description:
AbstractBackgroundThe reconstruction of large fistulous defects following the radical ablation of maxillary sinus carcinoma remains challenging.
The procedure requires not only the coverage of both intra‐nasal lining and cheek skin but also sufficient obliteration of dead space between the two surfaces.
In this report, we present our experience on the reconstruction of through‐and‐through defects in the mid‐face with poly‐foliated chimeric perforator flaps.
MethodsNine patients (five males and four females) who received a two‐skin paddled and one muscle segment chimeric perforator flap reconstruction after maxillary sinus carcinoma ablation between March 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed in authors' hospital.
The mean age of the patients was 59.
11.
Six patients were diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma, two as adenoid cystic carcinoma, and one as adenocarcinoma.
Brown class IIIa defects were found in eight patients, and one patient had a Brown class IVa defect.
The mean size of intra‐nasal defect was 5.
67 × 4.
06 cm2, and the mean size of facial skin defect was 8.
94 × 6.
56 cm2.
ALT flaps were used in five patients, LD flaps in four patients.
The minor skin paddle was firstly inset to the mucosal defect site as the lining.
Then, the muscle segment was inset to eliminate the dead cavity.
Finally, the major skin paddle was inset to recover the cutaneous defect.
ResultsIn ALT group, the mean size of the minor skin paddle was 5.
7 × 4.
7 cm2, and the mean size of the major skin paddle was 8.
7 × 6.
6 cm2.
In LD group, the mean size of the minor skin paddle was 6.
88 × 4.
38 cm2, and the mean size of the major skin paddle was 11 × 7.
75 cm2.
All donor sites were closed primarily.
All flaps survived and no partial flap loss was encountered.
The mean follow‐up time was 14.
67 months, and there were no major postoperative complications.
ConclusionThe use of poly‐foliated chimeric perforator free flaps can provide functional and aesthetic coverage for extensive through‐and‐through mid‐face defects without significant donor‐site morbidities.
Related Results
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Comparative Study between Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps and Local Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Reconstruction of Gluteal Pressure Ulcers
Comparative Study between Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps and Local Fasciocutaneous Flaps in Reconstruction of Gluteal Pressure Ulcers
Background:
Gluteal pressure ulcers are a common problem, associated with great morbidity and cost, and their surgical treatment includes debridement with complete burs...
Map of perforators of the posterior tibial artery and peroneal artery using handheld doppler ultrasound evaluating clinical outcome of perforator flaps which cover soft tissue defects of the lower leg and foot
Map of perforators of the posterior tibial artery and peroneal artery using handheld doppler ultrasound evaluating clinical outcome of perforator flaps which cover soft tissue defects of the lower leg and foot
Background: Soft tissue defects of the lower leg and foot are complicated injuries with numerous causes including trauma, ulcers, and Gout. Widespread treatment of these defects ha...
Relationship of Maxillary Sinus and Maxillary First Molar Root Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Relationship of Maxillary Sinus and Maxillary First Molar Root Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Background: Cone beam CT (CBCT) is an advancement of conventional CT that uses a divergent pyramidal or conical X-ray beam for imaging the craniofacial complex. Studies on the maxi...
Correlation between the size of the maxillary sinus and vertical growth patterns: a 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic study
Correlation between the size of the maxillary sinus and vertical growth patterns: a 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic study
Abstract
Background The maxillary sinus has been considered as an important factor that affects the development of craniomaxillofacial bone. However, the correlation betwee...
Lifting of the Maxillary Sinus in Dental Implantation
Lifting of the Maxillary Sinus in Dental Implantation
Background: The posterior maxilla often presents challenges for dental implants due to reduced bone density and volume, exacerbated by alveolar resorption and sinus pneumatization....
Avaliação do Seio Maxilar: Radiografia Panorâmica Versus Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico
Avaliação do Seio Maxilar: Radiografia Panorâmica Versus Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico
O objetivo deste estudo retrospectivo implica em comparar a presença de velamento, o espessamento de mucosa e a presença de septo no seio maxilar em radiografias panorâmicas e tomo...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...


