Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution in a Rapidly Urbanizing River Basin Using a Modified DRASTIC Land Use–Lineament Density Method

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT Groundwater quality assessment is crucial for ensuring safe drinking water, protecting public health, and maintaining sustainable water resources for agricultural and industrial uses. The Awash River basin faces significant groundwater quality challenges due to rapid population growth, high urbanization, large‐scale irrigation, and industrial pollution. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the intrinsic vulnerability of aquifers to pollution in the Awash Basin and identify hotspots requiring urgent intervention using a modified DRASTIC overlay analysis method. In addition to the seven parameters considered in the generic DRASTIC overlay analysis (depth to the water table, recharge, aquifer media, slope, soil media, vadose zone, and hydraulic conductivity), we incorporated land use/land‐cover (LULC) and lineament density (LD) distributions (DRASTIC‐LU‐LD). This modification allowed us to produce more realistic groundwater vulnerability maps for the basin. To identify the most influential parameters in the overlay, sensitivity analysis was conducted using Map Removal Sensitivity Analysis (MRSA) and Single Parameter Sensitivity Analysis (SPSA). Initially, the generic DRASTIC index in the area ranges from 69 to 181, categorizing the area into four vulnerability zones: very low (21%), low (51%), medium (27%), and high (1%). After incorporating LU and LD, the index values ranged from 90 to 240. Based on the percentage of the total area studied, the inclusion of LU decreased the very low and low vulnerability zones from 72% to 44% and the inclusion of LD increased the high‐ and very‐high‐vulnerability zones from 14% to 27%. The areas most vulnerable to groundwater pollution are in the western (upper Awash), middle Awash, and northwestern regions, particularly in city centers where groundwater abstraction is significant. These high‐vulnerability zones coincide with municipal, industrial, and agricultural pollution sources. The vadose zone parameter has the highest impact in both MRSA and SPSA, with a variation index value of 3.08% and a mean effective weight of 27.93%, respectively. By identifying areas vulnerable to groundwater pollution, this study provides a valuable basis for informed decision‐making and the development of effective strategies for protecting groundwater from urban, industrial, and agricultural pollution sources.
Title: Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability to Pollution in a Rapidly Urbanizing River Basin Using a Modified DRASTIC Land Use–Lineament Density Method
Description:
ABSTRACT Groundwater quality assessment is crucial for ensuring safe drinking water, protecting public health, and maintaining sustainable water resources for agricultural and industrial uses.
The Awash River basin faces significant groundwater quality challenges due to rapid population growth, high urbanization, large‐scale irrigation, and industrial pollution.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the intrinsic vulnerability of aquifers to pollution in the Awash Basin and identify hotspots requiring urgent intervention using a modified DRASTIC overlay analysis method.
In addition to the seven parameters considered in the generic DRASTIC overlay analysis (depth to the water table, recharge, aquifer media, slope, soil media, vadose zone, and hydraulic conductivity), we incorporated land use/land‐cover (LULC) and lineament density (LD) distributions (DRASTIC‐LU‐LD).
This modification allowed us to produce more realistic groundwater vulnerability maps for the basin.
To identify the most influential parameters in the overlay, sensitivity analysis was conducted using Map Removal Sensitivity Analysis (MRSA) and Single Parameter Sensitivity Analysis (SPSA).
Initially, the generic DRASTIC index in the area ranges from 69 to 181, categorizing the area into four vulnerability zones: very low (21%), low (51%), medium (27%), and high (1%).
After incorporating LU and LD, the index values ranged from 90 to 240.
Based on the percentage of the total area studied, the inclusion of LU decreased the very low and low vulnerability zones from 72% to 44% and the inclusion of LD increased the high‐ and very‐high‐vulnerability zones from 14% to 27%.
The areas most vulnerable to groundwater pollution are in the western (upper Awash), middle Awash, and northwestern regions, particularly in city centers where groundwater abstraction is significant.
These high‐vulnerability zones coincide with municipal, industrial, and agricultural pollution sources.
The vadose zone parameter has the highest impact in both MRSA and SPSA, with a variation index value of 3.
08% and a mean effective weight of 27.
93%, respectively.
By identifying areas vulnerable to groundwater pollution, this study provides a valuable basis for informed decision‐making and the development of effective strategies for protecting groundwater from urban, industrial, and agricultural pollution sources.

Related Results

Groundwater vulnerability assessment in areas with diverse Quaternary deposits
Groundwater vulnerability assessment in areas with diverse Quaternary deposits
Groundwater is the most crucial drinking water resource in many areas of the world. In spite of its overall abundance, the resource remains vulnerable to pollution, as groundwater ...
Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment in the Huangshui River Basin Under Representative Environmental Change
Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment in the Huangshui River Basin Under Representative Environmental Change
The Huangshui River Basin is located in the transition zone between the Loess Plateau and the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, characterized by a fragile hydrological and ecological environm...
Characterizing Groundwater Quality, Recharge and Distribution under Anthropogenic conditions
Characterizing Groundwater Quality, Recharge and Distribution under Anthropogenic conditions
Awareness concerning sustainable groundwater management is gaining traction and calls for adequate understanding of the complexities of natural and anthropogenic processes and how ...
Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Using GIS and DRASTIC for Upper Palar River Basin, Tamil Nadu
Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Using GIS and DRASTIC for Upper Palar River Basin, Tamil Nadu
ABSTRACT Groundwater is one of the valuable resources and due to increase in the population, industrialization and agriculture practices, the groundwater stress has ...
Groundwater vulnerability of megacity under changing climate and land use scenarios
Groundwater vulnerability of megacity under changing climate and land use scenarios
<p>Rapid urbanization and climate change pose a serious threat to the groundwater resource of urban regions in terms of contamination and excessive groundwater abstra...
Indicator-based assessment of groundwater resources sustainability in South Korea
Indicator-based assessment of groundwater resources sustainability in South Korea
Groundwater level decline and quality deterioration is continuously observed nationwide in South Korea. Meanwhile, the demand for groundwater, which is relatively stable and clean ...
Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on the modified DRASTIC model: A case study in Baicheng City, China
Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on the modified DRASTIC model: A case study in Baicheng City, China
Abstract Accurate assessment of groundwater vulnerability objectively reflects an area’s potential for groundwater pollution and provides a reference basis for pollution co...

Back to Top