Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Schelling Now
View through CrossRef
For too long Schelling's philosophy has been seen as no more than a transition from the philosophies of Kant and Fichte to that of Hegel. In recent years, however, Schelling's philosophy has begun to be recognized as worthy of study in its own right. Complementing The New Schelling (2004), ed. by Judith Norman and Alistair Welchman, this volume of 14 essays, edited by Wirth (Oglethorpe Univ.), constitutes a crucial further step in establishing the importance and contemporary relevance of Schelling's philosophy. Schelling Now is divided into three sections: New Approaches, Rethinking Concepts, and Schelling and Contemporary Philosophy. Although this last section demonstrates the relevance of Schelling's philosophy to that of Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Levinas, Nancy, and Nishitani, none of the essays effectively argues that Schelling has insights not achieved by those other thinkers or that his philosophy can be seen as having advanced, avant la lettre, beyond theirs. Moreover, Schelling's philosophy has not yet been brought into the conversation of analytic philosophy. Not until these occur will it be fully rehabilitated. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-level undergraduates through faculty/researchers.
Title: Schelling Now
Description:
For too long Schelling's philosophy has been seen as no more than a transition from the philosophies of Kant and Fichte to that of Hegel.
In recent years, however, Schelling's philosophy has begun to be recognized as worthy of study in its own right.
Complementing The New Schelling (2004), ed.
by Judith Norman and Alistair Welchman, this volume of 14 essays, edited by Wirth (Oglethorpe Univ.
), constitutes a crucial further step in establishing the importance and contemporary relevance of Schelling's philosophy.
Schelling Now is divided into three sections: New Approaches, Rethinking Concepts, and Schelling and Contemporary Philosophy.
Although this last section demonstrates the relevance of Schelling's philosophy to that of Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Levinas, Nancy, and Nishitani, none of the essays effectively argues that Schelling has insights not achieved by those other thinkers or that his philosophy can be seen as having advanced, avant la lettre, beyond theirs.
Moreover, Schelling's philosophy has not yet been brought into the conversation of analytic philosophy.
Not until these occur will it be fully rehabilitated.
Summing Up: Recommended.
Upper-level undergraduates through faculty/researchers.
Related Results
Minded Nature: On naturalism and the bond between mind and nature in Schelling’s philosophy
Minded Nature: On naturalism and the bond between mind and nature in Schelling’s philosophy
This thesis develops a metaphysical framework for understanding the bond between “nature” and “mind”. The framework is modelled on F. W. J. Schelling’s philosophy as he presents it...
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von (1775–1854)
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von (1775–1854)
Like the other German Idealists, Schelling began his philosophical career by acknowledging the fundamental importance of Kant’s grounding of knowledge in the synthesizing activity ...
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von (1775–1854)
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von (1775–1854)
Like the other German Idealists, Schelling began his philosophical career by acknowledging the importance of Kant’s grounding of knowledge in the synthesising activity of the subje...
Priority Monism in Schelling’s 1801–1802 Writings
Priority Monism in Schelling’s 1801–1802 Writings
Abstract
This chapter articulates the features of Schelling’s monism as presented in 1801–1802, arguing that it is a priority monism inspired by a certain strand of ...
Schelling’s Innovations
Schelling’s Innovations
Abstract
This chapter presents two of Schelling’s works, his 1797 Ideas and his 1800 System, as consonant with the Neoplatonic elements of his early essays. This cha...
Mysticism in Schelling’s 1801–1802 Writings
Mysticism in Schelling’s 1801–1802 Writings
Abstract
This chapter argues that Schelling’s works of 1801–1802 successfully address two worries concerning his mysticism: first, that all talk of the absolute is m...
Mysticism in Schelling’s Plato-Notebooks of 1792–1794
Mysticism in Schelling’s Plato-Notebooks of 1792–1794
Abstract
This chapter advances an interpretation of Schelling’s Plato-notebooks of 1792–1794 as demonstrating his commitment to a kind of mysticism. Schelling endors...
Critique et science : étude sur la transformation du criticisme dans les premiers écrits de F. W. J. Schelling
Critique et science : étude sur la transformation du criticisme dans les premiers écrits de F. W. J. Schelling
La présente thèse s'interroge sur le statut de la pensée du jeune Schelling en tant que philosophie postkantienne : s’agit-il d’une philosophie qui revient en-deçà des acquis de la...

