Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Improving patient self-reporting of antihypertensive adverse drug events in primary care: a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background About 25% of patients experience adverse drug events (ADE) in primary care, but few events are reported by the patients themselves. One solution to improve the detection and management of ADEs in primary care is for patients to report them to their general practitioner. The study aimed to assess the effect of a booklet designed to improve communication and interaction between patients treated with anti-hypertensive drugs and general practitioners on the reporting of ADEs. Methods A cluster randomized controlled cross-sectional stepped wedge open trial (five periods of 3 months) was conducted. A cluster was a group of general practitioners working in ambulatory offices in France. Adults consulting their general practitioner to initiate, modify, or renew an antihypertensive prescription were included. A booklet including information on cardiovascular risks, antihypertensive treatments, and ADE report forms was delivered by the general practitioner to the patient in the intervention group. The primary outcome was the reporting of at least one ADE by the patient to his general practitioner during the three-month period after enrolment. Two clusters were randomised by sequence for a total of 8 to receive the intervention. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. A logistic mixed model with random intercept was used. Results Sixty general practitioners included 1095 patients (median: 14 per general practitioner; range: 1–103). More patients reported at least one ADE to their general practitioner in the intervention condition compared to the control condition (aOR = 3.5, IC95 [1.2–10.1], p = 0.02). The modification and initiation of an antihypertensive treatment were also significantly associated with the reporting of ADEs (aOR = 4.4, CI95 [1.9–10.0], p <  0.001 and aOR = 11.0, CI95 [4.6–26.4], p <  0.001, respectively). The booklet delivery also improved patient satisfaction on general practitioner communication and high blood pressure management. Conclusion A booklet can improve patient self-reporting of ADEs to their general practitioners. Future research should assess whether it can improve general practitioner management of ADEs and patient’s health status. Trial registration Trial registry identifier NCT01610817 (2012/05/30).
Title: Improving patient self-reporting of antihypertensive adverse drug events in primary care: a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial
Description:
Abstract Background About 25% of patients experience adverse drug events (ADE) in primary care, but few events are reported by the patients themselves.
One solution to improve the detection and management of ADEs in primary care is for patients to report them to their general practitioner.
The study aimed to assess the effect of a booklet designed to improve communication and interaction between patients treated with anti-hypertensive drugs and general practitioners on the reporting of ADEs.
Methods A cluster randomized controlled cross-sectional stepped wedge open trial (five periods of 3 months) was conducted.
A cluster was a group of general practitioners working in ambulatory offices in France.
Adults consulting their general practitioner to initiate, modify, or renew an antihypertensive prescription were included.
A booklet including information on cardiovascular risks, antihypertensive treatments, and ADE report forms was delivered by the general practitioner to the patient in the intervention group.
The primary outcome was the reporting of at least one ADE by the patient to his general practitioner during the three-month period after enrolment.
Two clusters were randomised by sequence for a total of 8 to receive the intervention.
An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted.
A logistic mixed model with random intercept was used.
Results Sixty general practitioners included 1095 patients (median: 14 per general practitioner; range: 1–103).
More patients reported at least one ADE to their general practitioner in the intervention condition compared to the control condition (aOR = 3.
5, IC95 [1.
2–10.
1], p = 0.
02).
The modification and initiation of an antihypertensive treatment were also significantly associated with the reporting of ADEs (aOR = 4.
4, CI95 [1.
9–10.
0], p <  0.
001 and aOR = 11.
0, CI95 [4.
6–26.
4], p <  0.
001, respectively).
The booklet delivery also improved patient satisfaction on general practitioner communication and high blood pressure management.
Conclusion A booklet can improve patient self-reporting of ADEs to their general practitioners.
Future research should assess whether it can improve general practitioner management of ADEs and patient’s health status.
Trial registration Trial registry identifier NCT01610817 (2012/05/30).

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Pharmacogenomics and the Concept of Personalized Medicine for the Management of Hypertension
Pharmacogenomics and the Concept of Personalized Medicine for the Management of Hypertension
Hypertension poses a significant global burden due to low adherence to antihypertensive medications. Hypertension treatment aims to bring blood pressure within physiological ranges...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
2 mils Au wire interchip wedge bond cratering study
2 mils Au wire interchip wedge bond cratering study
Au wire thermosonic wedge bonding is applied for die to die interconnect on accelerometer device. With the fragile bond pad structure of MEMS device, bond pad cratering or bond pad...
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
<p dir="ltr">Randomised trials are regarded as the gold standard in evaluating the effectiveness and safety of medical interventions, but they are not always feasible due to ...
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
<p dir="ltr">Randomised trials are regarded as the gold standard in evaluating the effectiveness and safety of medical interventions, but they are not always feasible due to ...

Back to Top