Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

L51492 Evaluation of the Kaiser Effect in Pipe Steels

View through CrossRef
Acoustic emission (AE) proof testing is a particularly attractive method of nondestructively examining large structures such as pressure vessels and pipelines because a total volumetric examination can be made with AE sensors mounted at relatively large intervals over the surface of-the structures. The proof test, to be effective, requires an increase in pressure that is significantly greater than previously applied pressure in order to elicit AE from existing defects. In the case of gas pipelines, however, overpressure of gas in the line represents a considerable risk. It is therefore desirable to develop a means of using AE to examine gas pipelines without excessive overpressure in the line. Even in a flawed structure, AE is significantly reduced or absent during reload to a previously attained stress. This is known as the Kaiser effect. The Kaiser effect is defined in ASTM E610 as \the absence of detectable acoustic emission until previously applied stress levels are exceeded.\" This quieting of AE during reload is believed to be connected with the reduction of compression yield which accompanies the increase in tensile yield as a result of the Bauschinger effect. This project was undertaken to evaluate the Kaiser effect recovery at several pressurization levels in pipeline steels to minimize over-pressurization during AE proof testing of pipelines. The experiment to measure the Kaiser recovery was designed so that it would include the major types of defect scenarios and would cover the range of stress levels which a pipeline can experience. The defects, which were included in the tests, included the commonly occurring defects such as fatigue cracks, stress corrosion cracks, and corrosion pits. A specimen without flaws was also included. The effect of stress on the Kaiser recovery was studied by loading the specimens to four levels of stress: 25, 50, 75, and 90 percent of the yield strength of the material. The recovery of the Kaiser effect was measured by loading the sample to the same stress levels at certain intervals of time ranging from 10 minutes to 30 days. These tests were done to measure the acoustic emissions due to loading with an increase in the time during which the Kaiser effect could possibly recover.
Pipeline Research Council International, Inc. (PRCI)
Title: L51492 Evaluation of the Kaiser Effect in Pipe Steels
Description:
Acoustic emission (AE) proof testing is a particularly attractive method of nondestructively examining large structures such as pressure vessels and pipelines because a total volumetric examination can be made with AE sensors mounted at relatively large intervals over the surface of-the structures.
The proof test, to be effective, requires an increase in pressure that is significantly greater than previously applied pressure in order to elicit AE from existing defects.
In the case of gas pipelines, however, overpressure of gas in the line represents a considerable risk.
It is therefore desirable to develop a means of using AE to examine gas pipelines without excessive overpressure in the line.
Even in a flawed structure, AE is significantly reduced or absent during reload to a previously attained stress.
This is known as the Kaiser effect.
The Kaiser effect is defined in ASTM E610 as \the absence of detectable acoustic emission until previously applied stress levels are exceeded.
\" This quieting of AE during reload is believed to be connected with the reduction of compression yield which accompanies the increase in tensile yield as a result of the Bauschinger effect.
This project was undertaken to evaluate the Kaiser effect recovery at several pressurization levels in pipeline steels to minimize over-pressurization during AE proof testing of pipelines.
The experiment to measure the Kaiser recovery was designed so that it would include the major types of defect scenarios and would cover the range of stress levels which a pipeline can experience.
The defects, which were included in the tests, included the commonly occurring defects such as fatigue cracks, stress corrosion cracks, and corrosion pits.
A specimen without flaws was also included.
The effect of stress on the Kaiser recovery was studied by loading the specimens to four levels of stress: 25, 50, 75, and 90 percent of the yield strength of the material.
The recovery of the Kaiser effect was measured by loading the sample to the same stress levels at certain intervals of time ranging from 10 minutes to 30 days.
These tests were done to measure the acoustic emissions due to loading with an increase in the time during which the Kaiser effect could possibly recover.

Related Results

Optimized Design of Pipe-in-Pipe Systems
Optimized Design of Pipe-in-Pipe Systems
Abstract Deepwater subsea developments must address the flow assurance issues and increasingly these are forming a more critical part of the design. Pipe-in-pipe ...
Een passie voor precisie: Frederik Kaiser en het instrumentarium van de Leidse Sterrewacht
Een passie voor precisie: Frederik Kaiser en het instrumentarium van de Leidse Sterrewacht
Passion for precision. Frederik Kaiser and the instrumentation of Leiden ObservatoryFrederik Kaiser (1808-1872) was one of the most inspiring directors of the Leiden astronomical o...
Clad Steel Pipe for Corrosive Gas Transportation
Clad Steel Pipe for Corrosive Gas Transportation
ABSTRACT This paper describes the applicability and reliability Of clad steel pipe and its welds in sour gas environments in comparison with those of 22%Cr-5.5%Ni...
The Development of Large-Diameter HighStrength Line Pipe for Low-Temperature Service
The Development of Large-Diameter HighStrength Line Pipe for Low-Temperature Service
ABSTRACT The evolution of large-diameter U-O-E submerged-are-welded line pipe is discussed in relation to the changes in both steel composition and processing tha...
Preparation and Performance Evaluation of Erosion Resistant Lining of Bimetallic Composite Pipe
Preparation and Performance Evaluation of Erosion Resistant Lining of Bimetallic Composite Pipe
Abstract Erosion widely exists in oil and gas production and transmission pipelines, which seriously affects the service life of pipelines. Ordinary carbon steel pip...
Pipe-in-Pipe Swaged Field Joint for Reel Lay
Pipe-in-Pipe Swaged Field Joint for Reel Lay
Abstract Subsea 7 and ITP InTerPipe (ITP) have developed a highly efficient Pipe in Pipe technology to be installed by the Reel-Lay method. This solution is based...
HDPE Cooling Water Pipe for Power Generation
HDPE Cooling Water Pipe for Power Generation
Cooling water pipe systems are a critical part of a power generation plant. If the cooling water pipe fails, the whole plant may shut down. Due to its high tensile strength steel p...
Overtrawlability and Mechanical Damage of Pipe-in-Pipe
Overtrawlability and Mechanical Damage of Pipe-in-Pipe
A pipeline on the seabed may be struck by moving trawl gear, and that may damage the pipeline. Trenching can be a useful but expensive way to protect the pipeline. Pipe-in-pipe and...

Back to Top