Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Heading Control of a Turret-Moored FPSO with and Without Forward Thrusters
View through CrossRef
Abstract
A valuable property of a turret moored FPSO is its ability to weathervane or self adjust its heading to the varying metocean environment. Still, heading control with thrusters is necessary when a different heading than the natural weathervaning heading is wanted for operational reasons. In particular, in non-colinear metocean conditions it may be desirable to keep the bow of the FPSO against the waves to reduce rolling. It may happen that the weathervaning becomes unstable. In this case, the vessel will go into fishtailing motion, which is a phenomenon that is governed mainly by interaction between sway and yaw. Fishtailing is weather-dependent. When it happens, heading control is needed to stabilize it.
One important objective of the study has been to investigate if satisfactory heading control can be obtained using thrusters aft only, or if thrusters forward are necessary.
For a given FPSO design, we study weathervaning stability by formulating a linear model in sway and yaw. Based on this model with damping neglected, we develop three simplified criteria for stability. Using heuristic argumentation, we accept the criteria as conditions for sufficiency. The system's eigenvalues give sufficient and necessary conditions for stability. Using metocean hindcast data covering a time span of 56 years, the simple criteria are tested against the eigenvalues of the sway-yaw model. We found good agreement.
The heading controller used is essentially a PID controller. It is found that with aft thrusters only, good heading control can be achieved for all the metocean states in the 56 years span, provided the controller gain is moderate. With high controller gain, the thrusters may excite resonance in the turret mooring. Using additional thrusters forward gives the freedom to reduce turret resonance. Time domain simulation with an accurate 6-degree-of-freedom model shows that thrusters aft and forward gives slightly better control than control using aft thrusters only. Still, using only aft thrusters appears to give satisfactory heading control.
Title: Heading Control of a Turret-Moored FPSO with and Without Forward Thrusters
Description:
Abstract
A valuable property of a turret moored FPSO is its ability to weathervane or self adjust its heading to the varying metocean environment.
Still, heading control with thrusters is necessary when a different heading than the natural weathervaning heading is wanted for operational reasons.
In particular, in non-colinear metocean conditions it may be desirable to keep the bow of the FPSO against the waves to reduce rolling.
It may happen that the weathervaning becomes unstable.
In this case, the vessel will go into fishtailing motion, which is a phenomenon that is governed mainly by interaction between sway and yaw.
Fishtailing is weather-dependent.
When it happens, heading control is needed to stabilize it.
One important objective of the study has been to investigate if satisfactory heading control can be obtained using thrusters aft only, or if thrusters forward are necessary.
For a given FPSO design, we study weathervaning stability by formulating a linear model in sway and yaw.
Based on this model with damping neglected, we develop three simplified criteria for stability.
Using heuristic argumentation, we accept the criteria as conditions for sufficiency.
The system's eigenvalues give sufficient and necessary conditions for stability.
Using metocean hindcast data covering a time span of 56 years, the simple criteria are tested against the eigenvalues of the sway-yaw model.
We found good agreement.
The heading controller used is essentially a PID controller.
It is found that with aft thrusters only, good heading control can be achieved for all the metocean states in the 56 years span, provided the controller gain is moderate.
With high controller gain, the thrusters may excite resonance in the turret mooring.
Using additional thrusters forward gives the freedom to reduce turret resonance.
Time domain simulation with an accurate 6-degree-of-freedom model shows that thrusters aft and forward gives slightly better control than control using aft thrusters only.
Still, using only aft thrusters appears to give satisfactory heading control.
Related Results
Competitive CVAR-FPSO concepts with Dry trees in ultra-deepwater; Weathervaning CVAR-FPSO for Brazil and Indonesia vs. Non-weathervaning for West Africa
Competitive CVAR-FPSO concepts with Dry trees in ultra-deepwater; Weathervaning CVAR-FPSO for Brazil and Indonesia vs. Non-weathervaning for West Africa
Abstract
A new FPSO concept termed CVAR-FPSO is under development by a JNOC headed Joint Industry Project (JIP). The concept, using Compliant Vertical Access Rise...
FPSO EIS Results and Record of Decision
FPSO EIS Results and Record of Decision
Abstract
The United States Department of the Interior (DOI), Minerals Management Service (MMS) prepared an environmental impact statement (EIS)1 to evaluate poten...
New Insights in Turret Mooring Systems Yaw Dynamics
New Insights in Turret Mooring Systems Yaw Dynamics
Owing to friction in the weathervaning system and in the swivel stack of a turret-moored FPSO, the turret can be locked to the FPSO in day-to-day environments meaning that no relat...
Gryphon Alpha FPSO - Experience Gained During Moorings Replacement and Hook-Up
Gryphon Alpha FPSO - Experience Gained During Moorings Replacement and Hook-Up
Abstract
In a North Sea storm during February 2011 the Gryphon Alpha FPSO broke four of her 10 mooring lines and moved partially off station, causing damage to su...
The Sanha LPG FPSO
The Sanha LPG FPSO
Abstract
The FPSO industry will soon have the first LPG FPSO in operation. The SANHA LPG FPSO is the first gas related FPSO. With the installation of the LPG FPSO...
FPSO's Today: What is the Optimum Concept?
FPSO's Today: What is the Optimum Concept?
ABSTRACT
FPSO technology over the past years has rapidly evolved from tanker based units with classical mooring systems to purpose-shaped new built vessels equipp...
The Challenges and Opportunities of FPSO Relocations
The Challenges and Opportunities of FPSO Relocations
Abstract
The first FPSO relocation project was completed 18 years ago (SBM's FPSO II), and since that time there has been a steady rise in the number and complexi...
Conceptual Design of a Turret-Moored Production System (TUMOPS)
Conceptual Design of a Turret-Moored Production System (TUMOPS)
ABSTRACT
A project was initiated in 1987 to develop the Turret Moored Production System (TUMOPS) concept for:developing offshore fields in remote locations where ...

