Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Limitation of EOR Applications in Tight Oil Formation

View through CrossRef
Abstract Tight oil reservoirs have become one of the main forces of oil production growth in the USA. Only 3% to 7% of the oil can be recovered under primary depletion. Further improvement in oil recovery in tight oil reservoirs can be achieved by applying gas flooding or huff ‘n’ puff. However, these methods have limitations, especially when dealing with ultra-low permeable formations. Hence, the objective of this study was to discover the limitations of EOR methods in tight formation. A 2D compositional simulation model was used to investigate the limitations of applying gas flooding and huff ‘n’ puff in a tight formation. The results were compared under distinct scenarios and conditions. Distinct values of well spacing were used to identify the optimal well spacing. Different average permeability values were used to study the effect of permeability value on the EOR performance in tight formation. The Simulation Model results showed a potential of applying EOR in tight formation under specific conditions. Well spacing optimization has a significant effect on the gas flooding performance in tight formations. Hence, it is recommended to identify the well spacing before commencing gas flooding or huff ‘n’ puff. This simulation study showed any formation with a permeability less than 0.01 md should not be considered for gas flooding due to gas injectivity issues, long injection time, and long depletion time. Huff ‘n’ puff showed better results and more oil recovery at a permeability less than 0.01 md. Simulation results showed that any formation with a permeability greater than 0.1 md may be considered for gas flooding because of the following reasons: gas flooding showed a better recovery factor compared to the huff ‘n’ puff method; short depletion time was needed to start gas injection; and gas flooding required less injection time and provided long well spacing. This study increases understanding of the EOR factor in a tight formation. The results of the study showed the limitations of the EOR using simulation approaches. Knowing the disadvantages and limitations of EOR in tight formations will lead to improving the efficiency of EOR in tight formations.
Title: Limitation of EOR Applications in Tight Oil Formation
Description:
Abstract Tight oil reservoirs have become one of the main forces of oil production growth in the USA.
Only 3% to 7% of the oil can be recovered under primary depletion.
Further improvement in oil recovery in tight oil reservoirs can be achieved by applying gas flooding or huff ‘n’ puff.
However, these methods have limitations, especially when dealing with ultra-low permeable formations.
Hence, the objective of this study was to discover the limitations of EOR methods in tight formation.
A 2D compositional simulation model was used to investigate the limitations of applying gas flooding and huff ‘n’ puff in a tight formation.
The results were compared under distinct scenarios and conditions.
Distinct values of well spacing were used to identify the optimal well spacing.
Different average permeability values were used to study the effect of permeability value on the EOR performance in tight formation.
The Simulation Model results showed a potential of applying EOR in tight formation under specific conditions.
Well spacing optimization has a significant effect on the gas flooding performance in tight formations.
Hence, it is recommended to identify the well spacing before commencing gas flooding or huff ‘n’ puff.
This simulation study showed any formation with a permeability less than 0.
01 md should not be considered for gas flooding due to gas injectivity issues, long injection time, and long depletion time.
Huff ‘n’ puff showed better results and more oil recovery at a permeability less than 0.
01 md.
Simulation results showed that any formation with a permeability greater than 0.
1 md may be considered for gas flooding because of the following reasons: gas flooding showed a better recovery factor compared to the huff ‘n’ puff method; short depletion time was needed to start gas injection; and gas flooding required less injection time and provided long well spacing.
This study increases understanding of the EOR factor in a tight formation.
The results of the study showed the limitations of the EOR using simulation approaches.
Knowing the disadvantages and limitations of EOR in tight formations will lead to improving the efficiency of EOR in tight formations.

Related Results

Building an Enhanced Oil Recovery Culture to Maximise Asset Values
Building an Enhanced Oil Recovery Culture to Maximise Asset Values
Abstract Global energy demand is forecasted to rise by over one-third from now until 2035. As the relatively easy oil reserves deplete, focus will shift to developme...
Outlook and Technologies for Offshore CO2 EOR/CCS Projects
Outlook and Technologies for Offshore CO2 EOR/CCS Projects
Abstract The challenges facing offshore CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects are presented in this paper along with poten...
Philosophy of EOR
Philosophy of EOR
Abstract This paper seeks answers, through a ‘philosophical’ approach, to the questions of whether enhanced oil recovery projects are purely driven by economic restr...
Chemical EOR Evaluation for GNPOC and PDOC Fields in Sudan
Chemical EOR Evaluation for GNPOC and PDOC Fields in Sudan
Abstract The objective of this paper is to scope the Chemical EOR potential in both GNPOC and PDOC fields in Sudan. From the initial EOR screening, the most amenable...
Integrated EOR Screening in a Marginal Oil Field Environment
Integrated EOR Screening in a Marginal Oil Field Environment
Abstract An evaluation of potential EOR processes applicable in the marginal oil field operation of the Niger Delta region is presented. Technical feasibility, proce...
Evaluation of Enhanced Oil Recovery Potential of the Montney Shale Via the SuperEOR and UltraEOR Processes
Evaluation of Enhanced Oil Recovery Potential of the Montney Shale Via the SuperEOR and UltraEOR Processes
Abstract The Montney shale is the largest shale oil and gas producing formation in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and has the largest resource estimated at 1...
Best Practices for Assessing Chemical EOR Project Risks for a Major Malaysian Offshore Oilfield
Best Practices for Assessing Chemical EOR Project Risks for a Major Malaysian Offshore Oilfield
Abstract A major Malaysian matured offshore oilfield which is currently under waterflooding has been seen declining in production in recent years. Among various enha...
Advanced Characterization and Gas Enhanced Oil Recovery in Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
Advanced Characterization and Gas Enhanced Oil Recovery in Tuscaloosa Marine Shale
Abstract This work experimentally determines the viability of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by gas injection in core samples from Tuscaloosa Marine Shale (TMS) while i...

Back to Top