Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Kyiv School of University-Level Teaching of the History of Architecture and Art: Periodization, Centers, and Line of Personalities from the 19th to the 21st Century
View through CrossRef
The article examines the school of teaching the history of architecture in Kyiv academic universities from their emergence to the present day, taking into account the global and domestic context. The stages of the formation teaching the history of architecture in Kyiv universities are structured. The peculiarities of the methodology, conceptuality and leading personalities. The study has established that for almost 200 years (1934-2025) in Kyiv there has been a continuous tradition of teaching the history of architecture in higher education institutions. Despite the educational reforms that took place with regularity every few decades, changes in statehood, world and civil wars, the study proves the continuity and consistency of the line of personalities of teachers of the history of architecture and art in Kyiv universities. The study confirmed the contextuality and synchronicity of the formation of teaching and scientific research of the history of architecture in Kyiv universities to the formation of European scientific architectural studies and methods of teaching the history of architecture. Four consecutive periods (1834-1924, 1924-1941, 1945-1991, 1991-2025) and three main centers of the formation and development of the academic tradition of teaching the history of architecture in Kyiv have been identified: Kyiv University of St. Volodymyr in the first period, Kyiv Institute of Arts (NAOMA) and Kyiv Institute of Civil Engineering (KNUCA) in the second-fourth periods. The most prominent personalities who formed a stable and enduring tradition of teaching the history of architecture in Kyiv higher education are O. Beretti, P. Pavlov, G. Pavlutsky, S. Gilyarov (in the first period), S. Gilyarov, V. Morgilevsky, (in the second period), S. Aseev, V. Chepelyk (in the third period), V. Chepelyk, O. Gorbyk, Yu. Ivashko, G. Shevtsova (in the fourth period).
Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture
Title: The Kyiv School of University-Level Teaching of the History of Architecture and Art: Periodization, Centers, and Line of Personalities from the 19th to the 21st Century
Description:
The article examines the school of teaching the history of architecture in Kyiv academic universities from their emergence to the present day, taking into account the global and domestic context.
The stages of the formation teaching the history of architecture in Kyiv universities are structured.
The peculiarities of the methodology, conceptuality and leading personalities.
The study has established that for almost 200 years (1934-2025) in Kyiv there has been a continuous tradition of teaching the history of architecture in higher education institutions.
Despite the educational reforms that took place with regularity every few decades, changes in statehood, world and civil wars, the study proves the continuity and consistency of the line of personalities of teachers of the history of architecture and art in Kyiv universities.
The study confirmed the contextuality and synchronicity of the formation of teaching and scientific research of the history of architecture in Kyiv universities to the formation of European scientific architectural studies and methods of teaching the history of architecture.
Four consecutive periods (1834-1924, 1924-1941, 1945-1991, 1991-2025) and three main centers of the formation and development of the academic tradition of teaching the history of architecture in Kyiv have been identified: Kyiv University of St.
Volodymyr in the first period, Kyiv Institute of Arts (NAOMA) and Kyiv Institute of Civil Engineering (KNUCA) in the second-fourth periods.
The most prominent personalities who formed a stable and enduring tradition of teaching the history of architecture in Kyiv higher education are O.
Beretti, P.
Pavlov, G.
Pavlutsky, S.
Gilyarov (in the first period), S.
Gilyarov, V.
Morgilevsky, (in the second period), S.
Aseev, V.
Chepelyk (in the third period), V.
Chepelyk, O.
Gorbyk, Yu.
Ivashko, G.
Shevtsova (in the fourth period).
Related Results
The periodisation of Lithuanian history in the context of social history
The periodisation of Lithuanian history in the context of social history
The article reviews periodization models of Lithuanian history that are based on the history of politics and culture. A discussion about the periodization of the history of Lithuan...
The architecture of differences
The architecture of differences
Following in the footsteps of the protagonists of the Italian architectural debate is a mark of culture and proactivity. The synthesis deriving from the artistic-humanistic factors...
Wyniki badań 110 dziewcząt “nie uczących się i nie pracujących”
Wyniki badań 110 dziewcząt “nie uczących się i nie pracujących”
The publication presents the findings of an inquiry conducted among 110 girls aged 15 - 17 who had been directed, on the grounds of being “out of school and out of work”, to two on...
Developing Residents as Teachers: Process and Content
Developing Residents as Teachers: Process and Content
These data characterize and illuminate an analysis of experiences about teaching during each year of a pediatric residency training program in a tertiary care center. The curriculu...
Nikolai Leskov’s Kyiv Text
Nikolai Leskov’s Kyiv Text
In 1849, eighteen-year-old Nikolai Leskov moved to Kyiv, where he would spend the next ten years of his life. Some thirtyfour years later, he wrote a vivid memoir titled Pecherskie...
Trooping the (School) Colour
Trooping the (School) Colour
Introduction
Throughout the early and mid-twentieth century, cadet training was a feature of many secondary schools and educational establishments across Australia, with countless ...
Historia de la elaboración de la periodización específica para el voleibol: una revisión
Historia de la elaboración de la periodización específica para el voleibol: una revisión
Objective:It was necessary to explain the history of the elaboration of the theoretical content of the specific periodization for the volleyball.Method:The review stu...
KYIV ARCHITECTURE OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY: BIOGRAPHY OF THE ARCHITECT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ERA (CREATIVE PATH OF ARCHITECT OLEKSANDR HORBYK)
KYIV ARCHITECTURE OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY: BIOGRAPHY OF THE ARCHITECT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ERA (CREATIVE PATH OF ARCHITECT OLEKSANDR HORBYK)
The contextuality of the life and creative path of the architect's personality is emphasized in relation to the social-cultural and political-ideological conditions of the era, whi...