Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Influence of the Smile Line on Smile Attractiveness in Short and Long Face Individuals
View through CrossRef
Objectives. The study assessed the impact of facial height on attractiveness of smile, in association with the maxillary gingival display. This research was performed by dental professionals and laypersons.Materials and Methods. Frontal extraoral photographs were captured for both short and long faces. The photographs were modified using software for image-processing and three rater groups (orthodontists, dentists, and laypersons) evaluated the smile attractiveness, with 30 subjects in each group. Differences in ratings of the different smiles among the different experimental groups were examined using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The Mann–WhitneyUtest was performed for pairwise comparisons between the experimental groups.Results. Dentists and laypeople were most likely to agree. For the short face, laypeople and dentists both rated the +2 mm gingival display smile as the most attractive smile whilst orthodontists ranked the 0 mm gingival display smile as the most attractive smile. For the long face, laypeople and dentists ranked the 0 mm gingival display smile as the most attractive smile, whilst orthodontists ranked the +2 mm gingival display as the most attractive.Conclusion. Smile line of both short and long face subjects was found to influence the smile attractiveness rating by the three rater groups.
Title: Influence of the Smile Line on Smile Attractiveness in Short and Long Face Individuals
Description:
Objectives.
The study assessed the impact of facial height on attractiveness of smile, in association with the maxillary gingival display.
This research was performed by dental professionals and laypersons.
Materials and Methods.
Frontal extraoral photographs were captured for both short and long faces.
The photographs were modified using software for image-processing and three rater groups (orthodontists, dentists, and laypersons) evaluated the smile attractiveness, with 30 subjects in each group.
Differences in ratings of the different smiles among the different experimental groups were examined using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
The Mann–WhitneyUtest was performed for pairwise comparisons between the experimental groups.
Results.
Dentists and laypeople were most likely to agree.
For the short face, laypeople and dentists both rated the +2 mm gingival display smile as the most attractive smile whilst orthodontists ranked the 0 mm gingival display smile as the most attractive smile.
For the long face, laypeople and dentists ranked the 0 mm gingival display smile as the most attractive smile, whilst orthodontists ranked the +2 mm gingival display as the most attractive.
Conclusion.
Smile line of both short and long face subjects was found to influence the smile attractiveness rating by the three rater groups.
Related Results
PERBEDAAN JENIS SENYUM ANTARA LAKI-LAKI DAN PEREMPUAN BERDASARKAN BENTUK LENGKUNG SENYUM PADA SISWA SMK NEGERI 6 PADANG
PERBEDAAN JENIS SENYUM ANTARA LAKI-LAKI DAN PEREMPUAN BERDASARKAN BENTUK LENGKUNG SENYUM PADA SISWA SMK NEGERI 6 PADANG
Smile is one of the facial expression that are essential in expressing friendliness, agreement, and appreciation. Most patients that come to dentist to have treatment for an attrac...
ARE THE GINGIVAL DISPLAY AND THE SMILE ARC IN MALES AND FEMALES DIFFERENT?
ARE THE GINGIVAL DISPLAY AND THE SMILE ARC IN MALES AND FEMALES DIFFERENT?
Highlights
Gingival display and smile arc enhance the aesthetic value of a person's smile and may be influenced through dental treatment.
The individual profile photographs taken ...
Assessment of smile architecture and pink aesthetics: A successful methodology in cosmetic dentistry
Assessment of smile architecture and pink aesthetics: A successful methodology in cosmetic dentistry
Abstract
Objective: Aesthetic restorative treatment plays a very essential role in smile appearance. The aim of this study is to assess smile architecture and periodontiu...
Lip position in the smile aesthetic: Literature review
Lip position in the smile aesthetic: Literature review
Objective: Determine the lip position influence on dental aesthetics in adults older than 19 years according to academic publications in the last 5 years. Material and methods: A s...
Orthodontists’ and laypeople’s perception of smile height aesthetics in relation to varying degrees of transverse cant of anterior teeth
Orthodontists’ and laypeople’s perception of smile height aesthetics in relation to varying degrees of transverse cant of anterior teeth
Abstract
Aims
To determine the effect of varying the transverse cant of the anterior teeth on orthodontists’ and laypeopl...
Static and Dynamic Cues to Male Attractiveness
Static and Dynamic Cues to Male Attractiveness
Abstract Most studies on facial attractiveness have relied on attractiveness judged from photographs rather than video clips. Only a few studies combined images and video sequences...
Relationship between Smile Type and Periodontal Phenotype: A Clinical Cross-sectional Study
Relationship between Smile Type and Periodontal Phenotype: A Clinical Cross-sectional Study
Abstract
Objectives:
To assess the relationship between smile category and periodontal makeup.
Materials and Me...
Laypersons’ Perception Towards Gummy Smile and Facial Types: Acceptability and Treatment Benefit
Laypersons’ Perception Towards Gummy Smile and Facial Types: Acceptability and Treatment Benefit
Smile aesthetic perceptions could have different impact on orthodontic and prosthodontic treatment management and options to the patient. Objectives: To determine the laypersons’ s...

