Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Dialectology
View through CrossRef
Dialectology is not a coherent field with a single set of methodologies. Instead, it has developed since the 1960s to become an interest of many different interconnected fields, from typology to geographic information systems (GIS), from historical linguistics to phonetics. Within all of these subareas, dialectology has become increasingly more computational. The study of dialects is one of the oldest fields of language study, and the modern examination of dialects involves both linguistic and social analysis. As an example of its lineage, the American Dialect Society was founded in 1889; the scholarship those members produced between then and the 1960s could be described as a closely related set of methodologies designed to document words and pronunciations in order to delineate primarily geographical dialect boundaries and, secondarily, language change. From the 1960s forward, the study of dialects developed through the emerging fields of language variation and change, sociolinguistics, and computational linguistics. Modern scholars of dialects, be they starting off or established, should be aware of the wealth of information produced from the significant effort of the earlier decades of dialectology, and some gateways to that scholarship are cited herein. For example, the journal American Speech was established in 1925, and its early volumes are worth investigating for modern scholars to understand the changes in methodologies and research questions that have occurred. For this bibliography, however, most of the citations point to the diversified period from the 1960s forward. During that time, dialectology ceased to be a single entity, but instead became a subcomponent of many different fields. The plethora of language-related handbooks that publishers now regularly produce often contain a chapter related to dialect variation. With the diversity of dialect methods came an explosion in the number of publications on dialects. Additionally, for the over 6,900 languages on earth, scholars have come to realize that the many thousands of dialects offer opportunities to study how language and society work. Most of the scholarship involving dialects is focused on linguistic research questions, but dialect variation has proved a useful area of focus for scholars of social analysis. With the thousands of publications on dialect variation produced over the last fifty years, the citations provided here should be seen as worthwhile examples and gateways to other quality scholarship. From the works cited here, various paths of modern dialect research unfold.
Title: Dialectology
Description:
Dialectology is not a coherent field with a single set of methodologies.
Instead, it has developed since the 1960s to become an interest of many different interconnected fields, from typology to geographic information systems (GIS), from historical linguistics to phonetics.
Within all of these subareas, dialectology has become increasingly more computational.
The study of dialects is one of the oldest fields of language study, and the modern examination of dialects involves both linguistic and social analysis.
As an example of its lineage, the American Dialect Society was founded in 1889; the scholarship those members produced between then and the 1960s could be described as a closely related set of methodologies designed to document words and pronunciations in order to delineate primarily geographical dialect boundaries and, secondarily, language change.
From the 1960s forward, the study of dialects developed through the emerging fields of language variation and change, sociolinguistics, and computational linguistics.
Modern scholars of dialects, be they starting off or established, should be aware of the wealth of information produced from the significant effort of the earlier decades of dialectology, and some gateways to that scholarship are cited herein.
For example, the journal American Speech was established in 1925, and its early volumes are worth investigating for modern scholars to understand the changes in methodologies and research questions that have occurred.
For this bibliography, however, most of the citations point to the diversified period from the 1960s forward.
During that time, dialectology ceased to be a single entity, but instead became a subcomponent of many different fields.
The plethora of language-related handbooks that publishers now regularly produce often contain a chapter related to dialect variation.
With the diversity of dialect methods came an explosion in the number of publications on dialects.
Additionally, for the over 6,900 languages on earth, scholars have come to realize that the many thousands of dialects offer opportunities to study how language and society work.
Most of the scholarship involving dialects is focused on linguistic research questions, but dialect variation has proved a useful area of focus for scholars of social analysis.
With the thousands of publications on dialect variation produced over the last fifty years, the citations provided here should be seen as worthwhile examples and gateways to other quality scholarship.
From the works cited here, various paths of modern dialect research unfold.
Related Results
Բառբառային նիւթերը «Արարատ» հանդէսի էջերում
Բառբառային նիւթերը «Արարատ» հանդէսի էջերում
РЕЗЮМЕ
В статье представлены диалектные тексты и публикации, связанные с теорией диалектологии, нашедшие место на страницах «Арарат». Вышедшие в
свет в научно-духовном журнале мате...
How Albanians feel about each other’s speech: a perceptual dialectology study
How Albanians feel about each other’s speech: a perceptual dialectology study
Abstract
This contribution presents a perceptual dialectology study conducted with 123 Albanian-speaking participants, who rated the correctness and pleasantness ...
SEMANTIC FEATURES OF SOME TURKIC WORDS IN THE FOLKLORE LANGUAGE OF KHOREZM REGION
SEMANTIC FEATURES OF SOME TURKIC WORDS IN THE FOLKLORE LANGUAGE OF KHOREZM REGION
This article investigates the semantic features of certain Turkic words found in the folklore language of the Khorezm. The oral literary heritage of the Khorezm people, rich with d...
Coromines, colós de l'etimologia
Coromines, colós de l'etimologia
This article emphasizes the contribution of Joan Coromines to the Catalan and Romance dialectology. The foundations of his etymology are documentation, dialectal information and da...
Dialectal word status
Dialectal word status
This article focuses on the status of dialectal words, which is one of the most controversial issues in dialectology, in particular in “Uzbek dialectology”. This issue proves that ...
DIALECTOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF THE KAZAKH LANGUAGE OF KUNGRAD REGION IN KARAKALPAKSTAN
DIALECTOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF THE KAZAKH LANGUAGE OF KUNGRAD REGION IN KARAKALPAKSTAN
The given paper devoted to the study of the Kazakh dialectology, phonetic, lexical and grammatical peculiarities of the Kazakh language spoken in Karakalpakstan, The main aim of ou...
Data‐Driven Dialectology
Data‐Driven Dialectology
Abstract
Most studies of language variation proceed from the geographic or social distribution of single elements (features), and find it difficult to proceed fur...
Advances in Dialectometry
Advances in Dialectometry
Dialectometry applies computational and statistical analyses within dialectology, making work more easily replicable and understandable. This survey article first reviews the field...

