Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

“From My Perspective…The Anatomy of a Recall: A Retrospective Review of the Sulzer Recall 25 Years Later”

View through CrossRef
The 2000 Sulzer Orthopedics recall represents one of the most significant crises in orthopedic history, disrupting the established paradigm of successful total hip arthroplasty outcomes. Surgeons across the United States observed an alarming rise in early post-operative complications, particularly unexplained acetabular component loosening. This irregularity prompted investigations which ultimately identified a manufacturing defect responsible for early failure in thousands of patients. With assistance from personal accounts provided by Mr. David Floyd, the former president of Sulzer Orthopedics, and Dr. Jan Albert Koenig, an orthopedic surgeon directly involved in managing affected patients, this paper aims to re-examine the 2000 Sulzer recall on its 25th anniversary. The crisis created a lasting impact which extended beyond patient morbidity and triggered extensive legal, financial, and regulatory repercussions. The Sulzer recall affected nearly 20,000 patients and their orthopedic surgeons and their respective practices and underscored the criticality of stringent quality control and post-market surveillance in orthopedic device manufacturing. The Sulzer recall set a precedent for future orthopedic implant recalls highlighting the need for industry-wide improvements in regulatory oversight and technological advancements, including electronic medical records and modern monitoring modalities such as artificial intelligence-assisted systems. By analyzing the recall’s causes, response strategies, and long-term implications, this paper highlights crucial lessons for quality assurance, crisis management, and patient safety in the evolving landscapes of orthopedic surgery and medical device manufacturing.
Title: “From My Perspective…The Anatomy of a Recall: A Retrospective Review of the Sulzer Recall 25 Years Later”
Description:
The 2000 Sulzer Orthopedics recall represents one of the most significant crises in orthopedic history, disrupting the established paradigm of successful total hip arthroplasty outcomes.
Surgeons across the United States observed an alarming rise in early post-operative complications, particularly unexplained acetabular component loosening.
This irregularity prompted investigations which ultimately identified a manufacturing defect responsible for early failure in thousands of patients.
With assistance from personal accounts provided by Mr.
 David Floyd, the former president of Sulzer Orthopedics, and Dr.
 Jan Albert Koenig, an orthopedic surgeon directly involved in managing affected patients, this paper aims to re-examine the 2000 Sulzer recall on its 25th anniversary.
The crisis created a lasting impact which extended beyond patient morbidity and triggered extensive legal, financial, and regulatory repercussions.
The Sulzer recall affected nearly 20,000 patients and their orthopedic surgeons and their respective practices and underscored the criticality of stringent quality control and post-market surveillance in orthopedic device manufacturing.
The Sulzer recall set a precedent for future orthopedic implant recalls highlighting the need for industry-wide improvements in regulatory oversight and technological advancements, including electronic medical records and modern monitoring modalities such as artificial intelligence-assisted systems.
By analyzing the recall’s causes, response strategies, and long-term implications, this paper highlights crucial lessons for quality assurance, crisis management, and patient safety in the evolving landscapes of orthopedic surgery and medical device manufacturing.

Related Results

ChatGPT's Capabilities for Use in Anatomy Education and Anatomy Research
ChatGPT's Capabilities for Use in Anatomy Education and Anatomy Research
Dear Editors, Recently, the discussion of an artificial intelligence (AI) - fueled platform in several articles in your journal has attracted the attention of many researchers [1, ...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
History of anatomy and its involvement with medical science and practice: Historical review
History of anatomy and its involvement with medical science and practice: Historical review
The medical practice starts from Patient’s discomfort in his body structures due to distortion in morphology. This is located and examined by clinician so, medical practice and Ana...
Trainee’s Perception Of Applied Anatomy Knowledge in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: A prospective cross-sectional study
Trainee’s Perception Of Applied Anatomy Knowledge in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: A prospective cross-sectional study
Abstract Objective Evaluate Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G) trainees’ knowledge in surgical anatomy Designs Prospective cross-sectional study. Setting Departments of O&G i...
Applied anatomy knowledge in gynaecology and obstetrics: the trainees’ perception
Applied anatomy knowledge in gynaecology and obstetrics: the trainees’ perception
Abstract Background Medical education has recognised the importance of anatomy teaching. Limitations in applied anatomy knowledge exist among obstet...
The study of anatomy
The study of anatomy
Human anatomy concerns the structure of the human body. Anatomy is often interpreted as the study of only those structures that can be seen with the naked eye (gross anatomy). Anat...
Arthur Fula
Arthur Fula
This is a translation of a chapter entitled "Arthur Fula" from Peter Sulzer's unpublished manuscript Südafrik im Spiegel der Afrikaans Literatur (1965), pages 381-91. This Swiss li...
Métaphysique ou physiologie du beau ? La théorie des plaisirs de Johann Georg Sulzer (1751-1752)
Métaphysique ou physiologie du beau ? La théorie des plaisirs de Johann Georg Sulzer (1751-1752)
Les Recherches sur l’origine des sentiments agréables et désagréables que Sulzer présente en 1751-1752 à l’Académie de Berlin – et qu’il réédite en 1767 sous le titre de Nouvelle t...

Back to Top