Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Preliminary Study on Machinability of Super Austenitic Stainless Steel
View through CrossRef
Stainless steel is the most widely used alloys of steel. The reputed variety of stainless steel having customised material properties as per the design requirements is Duplex Stainless Steel and Austenitic Stainless Steel. The Austenite Stainless Steel alloy has been developed further to be Super Austenitic Stainless Steel (SASS) by increasing the percentage of the alloying elements to form the half or more than the half of the material composition. SASS (Grade-AL-6XN) is an alloy steel containing high percentages of nickel (24%), molybdenum (6%) and chromium (21%). The chemical elements offer high degrees of corrosion resistance, toughness and stability in a large range of hostile environments like petroleum, marine and food processing industries. SASS is often used as a commercially viable substitute to high cost non-ferrous or non-metallic metals. The ability to machine steel effectively and efficiently is of utmost importance in the current competitive market. This paper is an attempt to evaluate the machinability of SASS which has been a classified material so far with very limited research conducted on it. Understanding the machinability of this alloy would assist in the effective forming of this material by metal cutting. The novelty of research associated with this is paper is reasonable taking into consideration the unknowns involved in machining SASS. The experimental design consists of conducting eight milling trials at combination of two different feed rates, 0.1 and 0.15 mm/tooth; cutting speeds, 100 and 150 m/min; Depth of Cut (DoC), 2 and 3 mm and coolant on for all the trials. The cutting tool has two inserts and therefore has two cutting edges. The trial sample is mounted on a dynamometer (type 9257B) to measure the cutting forces during the trials. The cutting force data obtained is later analyzed using DynaWare supplied by Kistler. The machined sample is subjected to surface roughness (Ra) measurement using a 3D optical surface profilometer (Alicona Infinite Focus). A comprehensive metallography process consisting of mounting, polishing and etching was conducted on a before and after machined sample in order to make a comparative analysis of the microstructural changes due to machining. The microstructural images were capture using a digital microscope. The microhardness test were conducted on a Vickers scale (Hv) using a Vickers microhardness tester. Initial bulk hardness testing conducted on the material show that the alloy is having a hardness of 83.4 HRb. This study expects an increase in hardness mostly due to work hardening may be due to phase transformation. The results obtained from the cutting trials are analyzed in order to judge the machinability of the material. Some of the criteria used for machinability evaluation are cutting force analysis, surface texture analysis, metallographic analysis and microhardness analysis. The methodology followed in each aspect of the investigation is similar to and inspired by similar research conducted on other materials. However, the novelty of this research is the investigation of various aspects of machinability and drawing comparisons between each other while attempting to justify each result obtained to the microstructural changes observed which influence the behaviour of the alloy. Due to the limited scope of the paper, machinability criteria such as chip morphology, Metal Removal Rate (MRR) and tool wear are not included in this paper. All aspects are then compared and the optimum machining parameters are justified with a scope for future investigations.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Title: A Preliminary Study on Machinability of Super Austenitic Stainless Steel
Description:
Stainless steel is the most widely used alloys of steel.
The reputed variety of stainless steel having customised material properties as per the design requirements is Duplex Stainless Steel and Austenitic Stainless Steel.
The Austenite Stainless Steel alloy has been developed further to be Super Austenitic Stainless Steel (SASS) by increasing the percentage of the alloying elements to form the half or more than the half of the material composition.
SASS (Grade-AL-6XN) is an alloy steel containing high percentages of nickel (24%), molybdenum (6%) and chromium (21%).
The chemical elements offer high degrees of corrosion resistance, toughness and stability in a large range of hostile environments like petroleum, marine and food processing industries.
SASS is often used as a commercially viable substitute to high cost non-ferrous or non-metallic metals.
The ability to machine steel effectively and efficiently is of utmost importance in the current competitive market.
This paper is an attempt to evaluate the machinability of SASS which has been a classified material so far with very limited research conducted on it.
Understanding the machinability of this alloy would assist in the effective forming of this material by metal cutting.
The novelty of research associated with this is paper is reasonable taking into consideration the unknowns involved in machining SASS.
The experimental design consists of conducting eight milling trials at combination of two different feed rates, 0.
1 and 0.
15 mm/tooth; cutting speeds, 100 and 150 m/min; Depth of Cut (DoC), 2 and 3 mm and coolant on for all the trials.
The cutting tool has two inserts and therefore has two cutting edges.
The trial sample is mounted on a dynamometer (type 9257B) to measure the cutting forces during the trials.
The cutting force data obtained is later analyzed using DynaWare supplied by Kistler.
The machined sample is subjected to surface roughness (Ra) measurement using a 3D optical surface profilometer (Alicona Infinite Focus).
A comprehensive metallography process consisting of mounting, polishing and etching was conducted on a before and after machined sample in order to make a comparative analysis of the microstructural changes due to machining.
The microstructural images were capture using a digital microscope.
The microhardness test were conducted on a Vickers scale (Hv) using a Vickers microhardness tester.
Initial bulk hardness testing conducted on the material show that the alloy is having a hardness of 83.
4 HRb.
This study expects an increase in hardness mostly due to work hardening may be due to phase transformation.
The results obtained from the cutting trials are analyzed in order to judge the machinability of the material.
Some of the criteria used for machinability evaluation are cutting force analysis, surface texture analysis, metallographic analysis and microhardness analysis.
The methodology followed in each aspect of the investigation is similar to and inspired by similar research conducted on other materials.
However, the novelty of this research is the investigation of various aspects of machinability and drawing comparisons between each other while attempting to justify each result obtained to the microstructural changes observed which influence the behaviour of the alloy.
Due to the limited scope of the paper, machinability criteria such as chip morphology, Metal Removal Rate (MRR) and tool wear are not included in this paper.
All aspects are then compared and the optimum machining parameters are justified with a scope for future investigations.
Related Results
Magic graphs
Magic graphs
DE LA TESIS<br/>Si un graf G admet un etiquetament super edge magic, aleshores G es diu que és un graf super edge màgic. La tesis està principalment enfocada a l'estudi del c...
Product of digraphs, (super) edge-magic valences and related problems
Product of digraphs, (super) edge-magic valences and related problems
Discrete Mathematics, and in particular Graph Theory, has gained a lot of popularity during the last 7 decades. Among the many branches in Graph Theory, graph labelings has experim...
Possibility of Zinc Embrittlement in Fire
Possibility of Zinc Embrittlement in Fire
ABSTRACT
Zinc embrittlement is known as a kind of liquid metal embrittlement, a phenomenon where austenitic stainless steel and nickel alloy becomes brittle and/or c...
Clad Steel Pipe for Corrosive Gas Transportation
Clad Steel Pipe for Corrosive Gas Transportation
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the applicability and reliability Of clad steel pipe and its welds in sour gas environments in comparison with those of 22%Cr-5.5%Ni...
A Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance of Conventional, Teflon and Epoxy Coated Stainless Steel Archwires in Metal, Ceramic Brackets – An In vitro Study
A Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance of Conventional, Teflon and Epoxy Coated Stainless Steel Archwires in Metal, Ceramic Brackets – An In vitro Study
Aim and Objectives: To evaluate the frictional resistance of Conventional, Teflon, and Epoxy coated stainless steel archwires in Metal, Ceramic brackets.
Materials and Method...
Evaluating the Flaw Tolerance and Ductile Tearing Resistance of Austenitic Stainless Steel Welds
Evaluating the Flaw Tolerance and Ductile Tearing Resistance of Austenitic Stainless Steel Welds
Abstract
In general, austenitic stainless steels behave in a more ductile than brittle manner and do not typically experience a ductile-to-brittle transition like ty...
[RETRACTED] ACV Super Slim Gummies Reviews Scam Or Legit Updated 2022 – Must-See Worth Buying? v1
[RETRACTED] ACV Super Slim Gummies Reviews Scam Or Legit Updated 2022 – Must-See Worth Buying? v1
[RETRACTED]➪ACV Super Slim Gummies - Official Website Link - Click Here To Buy❤️ ✪Product Name ➯ ACV Super Slim Gummies UK✪Main Benefits ➯ Can help you with all your overweight i...
[RETRACTED] ACV Super Slim Gummies Reviews Scam Or Legit Updated 2022 – Must-See Worth Buying? v1
[RETRACTED] ACV Super Slim Gummies Reviews Scam Or Legit Updated 2022 – Must-See Worth Buying? v1
[RETRACTED]➪ACV Super Slim Gummies - Official Website Link - Click Here To Buy❤️ ✪Product Name ➯ ACV Super Slim Gummies UK✪Main Benefits ➯ Can help you with all your overweight i...

