Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Letter from the Editors

View through CrossRef
Blackness as a non-monolithic lived experience surrounds us at all times, permeating across institutions and platforms. Within this antiblack singularity where Black is rendered visible through violence and cruelty, Look @ Me Now: Black (In)Visibility across Institutions and Platforms seeks submissions highlighting Black joy, activism, exploration, and liberation as an unapologetic reclamation. Blackness does not and must not fit into Western technocultural modes of being and living. In lieu of challenges, across various spaces, platforms, and institutions perseverance and ingenuity have long served Black people as catalysts for agency and visibility. Shifting perspectives and bending realities, Blackness continues to leave its imprint within cultures, technologies, institutions, and platforms. Black (In)Visibility speaks to Black narratives and traditions as both demanding visibility and foretelling the benefits of an insular and protective interpretation of obscurity. Particularly, the invisibility of Blackness can be combated through non-oppressive systems and frameworks of knowing, doing, and being. What non-traditional frameworks and technologies do we use to make Blackness visible? How do choices of consumption and engagement confront and produce assumptions and frameworks for Blackness and establish alternative frameworks of vitality and joy? And finally, in what ways does visibility, invisibility, or hypervisibility affect the constitution and perception of Black personhood and everyday life? Our interpretation of (in)visibility encompasses the diversity of Black imaging and imagining and redaction and annotation. Moreover, our hope in this collection is to assemble a robust corpus that engages with Black (In)Visibility across various non-academic spaces and academic disciplines and perspectives.
Title: Letter from the Editors
Description:
Blackness as a non-monolithic lived experience surrounds us at all times, permeating across institutions and platforms.
Within this antiblack singularity where Black is rendered visible through violence and cruelty, Look @ Me Now: Black (In)Visibility across Institutions and Platforms seeks submissions highlighting Black joy, activism, exploration, and liberation as an unapologetic reclamation.
Blackness does not and must not fit into Western technocultural modes of being and living.
In lieu of challenges, across various spaces, platforms, and institutions perseverance and ingenuity have long served Black people as catalysts for agency and visibility.
Shifting perspectives and bending realities, Blackness continues to leave its imprint within cultures, technologies, institutions, and platforms.
Black (In)Visibility speaks to Black narratives and traditions as both demanding visibility and foretelling the benefits of an insular and protective interpretation of obscurity.
Particularly, the invisibility of Blackness can be combated through non-oppressive systems and frameworks of knowing, doing, and being.
What non-traditional frameworks and technologies do we use to make Blackness visible? How do choices of consumption and engagement confront and produce assumptions and frameworks for Blackness and establish alternative frameworks of vitality and joy? And finally, in what ways does visibility, invisibility, or hypervisibility affect the constitution and perception of Black personhood and everyday life? Our interpretation of (in)visibility encompasses the diversity of Black imaging and imagining and redaction and annotation.
Moreover, our hope in this collection is to assemble a robust corpus that engages with Black (In)Visibility across various non-academic spaces and academic disciplines and perspectives.

Related Results

Humanities
Humanities
James E. Côté and Anton L. Allahar, Lowering Higher Education: The Rise of Corporate Universities and the Fall of Liberal Education, reviewed by glen a. jones Daniel Coleman and S...
Academia 1.0: Slow Food in a Fast Food Culture? (A Reply to John Hartley)
Academia 1.0: Slow Food in a Fast Food Culture? (A Reply to John Hartley)
"You could think of our kind of scholarship," he said, "as something like 'slow food' in a fast-food culture."— Ivan Kreilkamp, co-editor of Victorian Studies(Chronicle of Higher E...
What is Analytic Philosophy
What is Analytic Philosophy
Special Issue: What is Analytic PhilosophyReferencesHaaparantaG. P. Baker and P. M. S. Hacker. Frege: Logical Excavations. Oxford, Blackwell, 1984.M. Dummett. The Interpretation of...
General object-based features account for letter perception
General object-based features account for letter perception
ABSTRACT After years of experience, humans become experts at perceiving letters. Is this visual capacity attained by learning specialized letter features, or by reu...
Challenges faced in the peer review system in open access journals
Challenges faced in the peer review system in open access journals
The whole mechanism of academic journal’s peer review system process effectively depends on how editors manage the journal work. The handling of the peer review system will determi...
Sleep Habits and Occurrence of Lowback Pain among Craftsmen
Sleep Habits and Occurrence of Lowback Pain among Craftsmen
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; ...
Sleep Habits and Occurrence of Lowback Pain among Craftsmen
Sleep Habits and Occurrence of Lowback Pain among Craftsmen
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; ...

Back to Top