Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Effects of pore-throat structure on reservoir blockage and wettability alteration during CO2 injection

View through CrossRef
<p>Injection of CO<sub>2</sub> into subsurface reservoirs occurs during Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) and also during Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) operations. During CO<sub>2</sub> injection, the efficacy and distribution of fluid flow in sandstone reservoirs is controlled by the pore-throat microstructure of the rock. Furthermore, CO<sub>2</sub> injection promotes asphaltene precipitation on the pore surface and can also affect fluid flow in the pore throats, decreasing the permeability and altering reservoir wettability. In this work, miscible and immiscible CO<sub>2</sub> flooding experiments under reservoir conditions (up to 70℃, 18 MPa) have been carried out on four samples with very similar permeabilities but different pore-throat structures in order to study the effects of pore-throat microstructure on formation damage. The features of pore-throat structure were evaluated by fractal theory, based on pore size distributions and rate-controlled porosimetry (RCP) mercury intrusion curves. Reservoir rocks with smaller pore throat sizes and more heterogeneous and poorer pore-throat microstructures were found to be more sensitive to asphaltene precipitation, with corresponding 15-20% lower oil recovery and 4-7% greater decreases in permeability than that of rocks with homogeneous and better pore-throat microstructure. However, the water-wettability index of cores with larger and more connected pore-throat microstructures was found to drop by an extra 15-25% than heterogeneous core due to more asphaltene precipitation caused by the larger sweep volume of injected CO<sub>2</sub> they consequently experienced, which is a disadvantage for EOR. In addition, immiscible flooding exacerbates the differences from 4-7% to 8-15% in permeability decline of the rocks with different pore-throat structures. Miscible flooding leads to more asphaltenes being precipitated from the crude oil, triggering in average an extra 11% change in wettability in comparison to immiscible flooding.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> CO<sub>2</sub> flooding, asphaltene precipitation, pore size distribution, pore-throat microstructure, reservoir blockage, wettability alteration</p>
Title: Effects of pore-throat structure on reservoir blockage and wettability alteration during CO2 injection
Description:
<p>Injection of CO<sub>2</sub> into subsurface reservoirs occurs during Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) and also during Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) operations.
During CO<sub>2</sub> injection, the efficacy and distribution of fluid flow in sandstone reservoirs is controlled by the pore-throat microstructure of the rock.
Furthermore, CO<sub>2</sub> injection promotes asphaltene precipitation on the pore surface and can also affect fluid flow in the pore throats, decreasing the permeability and altering reservoir wettability.
In this work, miscible and immiscible CO<sub>2</sub> flooding experiments under reservoir conditions (up to 70℃, 18 MPa) have been carried out on four samples with very similar permeabilities but different pore-throat structures in order to study the effects of pore-throat microstructure on formation damage.
The features of pore-throat structure were evaluated by fractal theory, based on pore size distributions and rate-controlled porosimetry (RCP) mercury intrusion curves.
Reservoir rocks with smaller pore throat sizes and more heterogeneous and poorer pore-throat microstructures were found to be more sensitive to asphaltene precipitation, with corresponding 15-20% lower oil recovery and 4-7% greater decreases in permeability than that of rocks with homogeneous and better pore-throat microstructure.
However, the water-wettability index of cores with larger and more connected pore-throat microstructures was found to drop by an extra 15-25% than heterogeneous core due to more asphaltene precipitation caused by the larger sweep volume of injected CO<sub>2</sub> they consequently experienced, which is a disadvantage for EOR.
In addition, immiscible flooding exacerbates the differences from 4-7% to 8-15% in permeability decline of the rocks with different pore-throat structures.
Miscible flooding leads to more asphaltenes being precipitated from the crude oil, triggering in average an extra 11% change in wettability in comparison to immiscible flooding.
</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> CO<sub>2</sub> flooding, asphaltene precipitation, pore size distribution, pore-throat microstructure, reservoir blockage, wettability alteration</p>.

Related Results

Quantifying flow reduction during injection of CO2 into legacy hydrocarbon reservoirs for CCUS
Quantifying flow reduction during injection of CO2 into legacy hydrocarbon reservoirs for CCUS
In the development of hydrocarbon fields, it is becoming known that CO2 injection (which is sometimes done to improve hydrocarbon production) can cause pore blockage and wettabilit...
Experimental Workflow for Quantifying the Performance of Geophysics-Based and Conventional Core-Based Wettability Assessment Methods
Experimental Workflow for Quantifying the Performance of Geophysics-Based and Conventional Core-Based Wettability Assessment Methods
Conventional wettability assessment methods (e.g., Amott-Harvey and USBM) are often time consuming and require core-scale measurements. We recently developed wettability models bas...
Scale-dependency Wettability of Tight Sandstone: Insights from an Eocene fluvial sandstone reservoir in the Bohai Bay Basin
Scale-dependency Wettability of Tight Sandstone: Insights from an Eocene fluvial sandstone reservoir in the Bohai Bay Basin
In the development of tight oil reservoirs, wettability determines the distribution and flow behavior of oil and water during reservoir development and enhanced oil recovery. Howev...
Design And Operation Of The Levelland Unit CO2 Injection Facility
Design And Operation Of The Levelland Unit CO2 Injection Facility
Abstract The Levelland CO2 Facility provides CO2 storageand handling capacity for the five CO2 injection pilots located in the Levelland Unit. Facilities pilots l...
Micro mechanism of reservoirs damage caused by CO2 displacement in tight reservoir
Micro mechanism of reservoirs damage caused by CO2 displacement in tight reservoir
CO2-fluid-rock interactions during CO2 injection in tight oil reservoirs, i.e. asphaltene precipitation and geochemical reactions, alter the pore-throat structure and wett...
Mechanism and Potential of CO2 Injection to Enhance Recovery Rate of Gas Reservoir
Mechanism and Potential of CO2 Injection to Enhance Recovery Rate of Gas Reservoir
Abstract This paper aims to clarify the mechanism and feasibility of carbon dioxide (CO2) injection into carbonate gas reservoirs to enhance recovery and evaluate it...
Rapid Large-scale Trapping of CO2 via Dissolution in US Natural CO2 Reservoirs
Rapid Large-scale Trapping of CO2 via Dissolution in US Natural CO2 Reservoirs
Naturally occurring CO2 reservoirs across the USA are critical natural analogues of long-term CO2 storage in the subsurface over geological timescales and provide valuable insights...

Back to Top