Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Successful Criteria for Indirect Decompression With Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
View through CrossRef
Objective: No consensus criteria have been established regarding ideal candidates for indirect decompression with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and contributing factors of indirect decompression failure were rarely reported. We aim to investigate the success rate of indirect decompression by LLIF with proposed selection criteria and identify risk factors associated with indirect decompression failure, defined as persistent pain requiring revision with direct decompression.Methods: Data from 191 patients undergoing LLIF were retrospectively reviewed. All the following criteria must be fulfilled: (1) dynamic clinical symptoms (pain relief in supine position), (2) presence of reducible disc height (recovered disc height in supine position), (3) no profound weakness, and (4) no static stenosis. The success rate of indirect decompression with LLIF and results after at least 1 year of follow-up were collected. Preoperative, procedure-related, and postoperative factors were assessed for their relationship with failure.Results: Of 191 patients,13 patients (6.8%) required additional direct decompression due to persistent pain, giving a criteria success rate of 93.2%. Factors associated with indirect decompression failure included low bone mineral density (T-score < 2.1), low reducible disc height (<13%), low postoperative disc height (< 10 mm), high-grade cage subsidence, and use of plate fixation.Conclusion: We proposed patient selection criteria for indirect decompression with LLIF which had a satisfactory success rate and identified factors associated with the need for additional direct decompression. Our proposed criteria may assist selection of patients likely to achieve good results following indirect decompression with LLIF, and optimize selection based on risk factors of failure.
The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
Title: Successful Criteria for Indirect Decompression With Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Description:
Objective: No consensus criteria have been established regarding ideal candidates for indirect decompression with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and contributing factors of indirect decompression failure were rarely reported.
We aim to investigate the success rate of indirect decompression by LLIF with proposed selection criteria and identify risk factors associated with indirect decompression failure, defined as persistent pain requiring revision with direct decompression.
Methods: Data from 191 patients undergoing LLIF were retrospectively reviewed.
All the following criteria must be fulfilled: (1) dynamic clinical symptoms (pain relief in supine position), (2) presence of reducible disc height (recovered disc height in supine position), (3) no profound weakness, and (4) no static stenosis.
The success rate of indirect decompression with LLIF and results after at least 1 year of follow-up were collected.
Preoperative, procedure-related, and postoperative factors were assessed for their relationship with failure.
Results: Of 191 patients,13 patients (6.
8%) required additional direct decompression due to persistent pain, giving a criteria success rate of 93.
2%.
Factors associated with indirect decompression failure included low bone mineral density (T-score < 2.
1), low reducible disc height (<13%), low postoperative disc height (< 10 mm), high-grade cage subsidence, and use of plate fixation.
Conclusion: We proposed patient selection criteria for indirect decompression with LLIF which had a satisfactory success rate and identified factors associated with the need for additional direct decompression.
Our proposed criteria may assist selection of patients likely to achieve good results following indirect decompression with LLIF, and optimize selection based on risk factors of failure.
Related Results
Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
One of the most common surgical cures for lumbar degenerative illnesses is lumbar fusion. Traditional open lumbar fusion is often used in clinical settings and has positive clinica...
Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for L4-5: Surgical Outcomes and Perioperative Complications
Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for L4-5: Surgical Outcomes and Perioperative Complications
Abstract
Purpose:Oblique lateral interbody fusion is increasingly being used by spine surgeons due to its many advantages. Although clinical analysis of oblique lateral int...
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in iatrogenic lumbar instability
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in iatrogenic lumbar instability
Background
Lumbosacral instability is one of the causes of failed back surgery syndrome, and it is characterized by loss of disc height with translational and in many c...
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Background Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common causes of low back and leg pain. Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration leads to the decrease of intervertebral height, the ...
Surgical Outcomes of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Treated with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Surgical Outcomes of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Treated with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Background: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) involves fusing vertebrae in the lower spine with bone grafts or cages to stabilize it. This surgical solution effectively addr...
The Nuclear Fusion Award
The Nuclear Fusion Award
The Nuclear Fusion Award ceremony for 2009 and 2010 award winners was held during the 23rd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference in Daejeon. This time, both 2009 and 2010 award winners w...
CHANGES IN RADIOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
CHANGES IN RADIOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
Objective : This study aims to evaluate changes in lumbosacral parameters after minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether interbody cage...
Posterior Insertion of a Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture with Kyphotic Deformity: A Case Sereis Series
Posterior Insertion of a Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture with Kyphotic Deformity: A Case Sereis Series
Introduction: Stable fixation with a wide-foot-plate expandable cage and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) cage has been reported as the ideal treatment for vertebral pseudart...

