Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Challenges to the Royal Military Kangmu Hunt

View through CrossRef
This chapter examines the rising challenges and obstacles to the royal military Kangmu hunts in the fifteenth century. Some of these obstacles were climate related, but others were a backlash to the successes of the Kangmu hunts. As demonstrated in the previous chapter, these royal military Kangmu hunts fostered the power of masculinity where hunting acumen and physical strength dominated the enemy and animals. Here too were moments when the royal family tapped into a Chinggisid legacy (connected to the family of Chinggis Khan, the founder of the Mongol Empire), and legitimised their rulership in the present over domestic control and foreign relations. However, such ideals clashed with the ideological rhetoric of officials around the king who began negotiating the boundaries of royal authority. A rising number of voices inside the government believed that the proximity to animals, domestic and wild, was incompatible with rulership. Neo-Confucian officials did not understand animals, nor were they privy to the training necessary to kill them. This lack of authority over the hunt and wildlife bothered them and, as this chapter argue, they wished to limit royal access to wildlife.
Title: Challenges to the Royal Military Kangmu Hunt
Description:
This chapter examines the rising challenges and obstacles to the royal military Kangmu hunts in the fifteenth century.
Some of these obstacles were climate related, but others were a backlash to the successes of the Kangmu hunts.
As demonstrated in the previous chapter, these royal military Kangmu hunts fostered the power of masculinity where hunting acumen and physical strength dominated the enemy and animals.
Here too were moments when the royal family tapped into a Chinggisid legacy (connected to the family of Chinggis Khan, the founder of the Mongol Empire), and legitimised their rulership in the present over domestic control and foreign relations.
However, such ideals clashed with the ideological rhetoric of officials around the king who began negotiating the boundaries of royal authority.
A rising number of voices inside the government believed that the proximity to animals, domestic and wild, was incompatible with rulership.
Neo-Confucian officials did not understand animals, nor were they privy to the training necessary to kill them.
This lack of authority over the hunt and wildlife bothered them and, as this chapter argue, they wished to limit royal access to wildlife.

Related Results

THE MILITARY FAMILY: DYNAMICS, STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES
THE MILITARY FAMILY: DYNAMICS, STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES
Family relationships remain one of the most valuable and meaningful human experiences, within and outside of the military, and when loss or conflict occurs, this has profound effec...
CONTEMPORARY MILITARY CHALLENGES IN ENGLISH – A PROBLEM OR AN OPPORTUNITY
CONTEMPORARY MILITARY CHALLENGES IN ENGLISH – A PROBLEM OR AN OPPORTUNITY
Dear readers,You are looking at a new edition of the Contemporary Military Challenges, which includes contributions by the authors employed in Slovenian defence system; all except ...
Transforming armed forces through military transparency
Transforming armed forces through military transparency
PurposeAfter discussing recent academic attempts to assess the status of worldwide military transparency and accountability in nations which adopted open governance paradigms, this...
The legal status of military command in Ukraine
The legal status of military command in Ukraine
The article is devoted to the study of the legal status of military command in Ukraine. The legal status of military command reflects its place in the system of public authorities ...
Integrated defence workforces: Challenges and enablers of military–civilian personnel collaboration
Integrated defence workforces: Challenges and enablers of military–civilian personnel collaboration
Abstract Defence organisations are unique in that they comprise integrated military and civilian personnel working in partnership with each o...
20 YEARS OF CONTEMPORARY MILITARY CHALLENGES
20 YEARS OF CONTEMPORARY MILITARY CHALLENGES
Reading the title of this editorial, many might think that Contemporary Military Challenges have not been published for so many years, and that before there was another publication...
Military Service and Political Participation in the Ancient World
Military Service and Political Participation in the Ancient World
“..[T]he question,” Fergus Millar writes, “of the relation between citizenship and active military service is fundamental” (CR 43 [1993]: 123). Yet relations between military servi...

Back to Top