Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Paper 56: Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes After Gluteus Medius Repair at 5-Years
View through CrossRef
Objectives: To define minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at a minimum of 5-years for patients undergoing endoscopic and open gluteus medius repair. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing primary open or endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tears between January 2012 and December 2015 with a minimum 5-years follow-up. Patient data collected included patient demographics, preoperative clinical function scores, and pre and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patient reported outcome measures included the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Internation Hip Outcome Tool 12 questions (iHOT-12). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values were calculated for each PRO using the distribution method while PASS was determined via the anchor-based method utilizing ROC curves and Youden’s index using SPSS Statistics (Version 27, IBM, Armonk, NY). Results: A total of 46 patients were included in the study. A majority of patients were female (91.3%), with an average age and BMI of 61.26 ± 9.74 and 27.42 ± 6.02, respectively. Differences in preoperative and 5-year postoperative PROs were statistically significant for each of the four measures (p<0.001). The MCID threshold values for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Sport-Specific (HOS-SS) subscale, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and the international Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT) were calculated to be 13.1, 14.5, 12.6 and 11.2 respectively. The PASS scores of HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, mHHS and iHOT were calculated to be 85.6, 79.7, 68.2 and 60.5 respectively. In addition, 86.1% of patients achieved either MCID or PASS postoperatively, with 90.9% and 69.8% reaching at least 1 threshold score for achieving MCID and PASS respectively, and 69.7% achieving both any MCID and any PASS. Conclusions: In patients undergoing open or endoscopic gluteus medius repair, our study defines MCID and PASS at mid-term follow-up. A majority of patients achieved any MCID (90.9%) and any PASS (69.7%) at 5-years postoperatively.
Title: Paper 56: Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes After Gluteus Medius Repair at 5-Years
Description:
Objectives: To define minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) at a minimum of 5-years for patients undergoing endoscopic and open gluteus medius repair.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data from all patients undergoing primary open or endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tears between January 2012 and December 2015 with a minimum 5-years follow-up.
Patient data collected included patient demographics, preoperative clinical function scores, and pre and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Patient reported outcome measures included the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Internation Hip Outcome Tool 12 questions (iHOT-12).
The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values were calculated for each PRO using the distribution method while PASS was determined via the anchor-based method utilizing ROC curves and Youden’s index using SPSS Statistics (Version 27, IBM, Armonk, NY).
Results: A total of 46 patients were included in the study.
A majority of patients were female (91.
3%), with an average age and BMI of 61.
26 ± 9.
74 and 27.
42 ± 6.
02, respectively.
Differences in preoperative and 5-year postoperative PROs were statistically significant for each of the four measures (p<0.
001).
The MCID threshold values for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Sport-Specific (HOS-SS) subscale, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and the international Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT) were calculated to be 13.
1, 14.
5, 12.
6 and 11.
2 respectively.
The PASS scores of HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, mHHS and iHOT were calculated to be 85.
6, 79.
7, 68.
2 and 60.
5 respectively.
In addition, 86.
1% of patients achieved either MCID or PASS postoperatively, with 90.
9% and 69.
8% reaching at least 1 threshold score for achieving MCID and PASS respectively, and 69.
7% achieving both any MCID and any PASS.
Conclusions: In patients undergoing open or endoscopic gluteus medius repair, our study defines MCID and PASS at mid-term follow-up.
A majority of patients achieved any MCID (90.
9%) and any PASS (69.
7%) at 5-years postoperatively.
Related Results
Association of Piriformis Thickness, Hip Muscle Strength, and Low Back Pain Patients with and without Piriformis Syndrome in Malaysia
Association of Piriformis Thickness, Hip Muscle Strength, and Low Back Pain Patients with and without Piriformis Syndrome in Malaysia
Low back pain is a serious threat to human health and the illness jeopardizes the human workforce and pressurizes the health system in the community. Low back pain might be related...
Contemporary Surgical Approaches for Refractory Gluteus Medius Pathology
Contemporary Surgical Approaches for Refractory Gluteus Medius Pathology
Trochanteric pain is a highly prevalent clinical entity of lateral hip pain, encompassing bursitis, tendinopathy, and/or rupture of the hip abductor apparatus. It is predominantly ...
EFFECTIVENESS OF DRY NEEDLING ACTIVATION OF GLUTEUS MAXIMUS ON LOW BACK PAIN DUE TO GLUTEAL AMNESIA: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
EFFECTIVENESS OF DRY NEEDLING ACTIVATION OF GLUTEUS MAXIMUS ON LOW BACK PAIN DUE TO GLUTEAL AMNESIA: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
BackgroundLow back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition that can limit daily activity, work participationand quality of life. In many patients, persistent low back pain is in...
COMPARATIVE EFFECT OF DRY NEEDLING ASSISTED GLUTEUS MAXIMUS ACTIVATION ON PAIN, DISABILITY AND MUSCLE STRENGTH IN LOW BACK PAIN DUE TO GLUTEAL AMNESIA: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
COMPARATIVE EFFECT OF DRY NEEDLING ASSISTED GLUTEUS MAXIMUS ACTIVATION ON PAIN, DISABILITY AND MUSCLE STRENGTH IN LOW BACK PAIN DUE TO GLUTEAL AMNESIA: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
BackgroundLow back pain is commonly associated with altered lumbopelvic mechanics, poor hip control andcompensatory overactivity of lumbar extensor muscles. Gluteal amnesia, charac...
Gluteus Medius ve Minimus Kas Kalınlığının Üç Aya Kadar Gelişimsel Kalça Displazisi Üzerine Etkisi
Gluteus Medius ve Minimus Kas Kalınlığının Üç Aya Kadar Gelişimsel Kalça Displazisi Üzerine Etkisi
-Purpose: To investigate whether there is a difference in the gluteus medius and minimus muscle thicknesses between the cases with Graf method type IIa and normal subjects.
&...
Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique)
Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique)
Background:
Meniscal extrusion is a phenomenon in which a degenerative posterior horn tear, radial tear, or root tear results in displacement of the body of the meniscu...
Comparison of muscle activation of 3 different hip belt squat techniques
Comparison of muscle activation of 3 different hip belt squat techniques
The purpose of this study was to differentiate between muscular activity of three different types of belt squats (SquatMax-MD, Pit Shark and Monster Rhino) and the muscle activatio...
All‐Endoscopic Single‐Row Repair of Full‐Thickness Gluteus Medius Tears
All‐Endoscopic Single‐Row Repair of Full‐Thickness Gluteus Medius Tears
Abstract
Abductor tendon tears typically develop insidiously in middle‐aged women and can lead to debilitating lateral h...

